Diplomacy - AUT Report

Main Metrics

Relationships (Self-Perceived)

Relationships (Others → AUT)

Orders: Issued vs Valid vs Rejected

Negotiations / Dialogues

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Greetings from Vienna! I propose we establish a strong Austria-Italy alliance from the start. I'm willing to support you into Greece while I take Serbia, and we can coordinate against Turkey afterward. I have no designs on Venice and would prefer we focus eastward together. What are your thoughts on Russia and Turkey?
To [RUS]: Hello from Austria-Hungary! I'd like to propose a non-aggression pact between us, at minimum regarding Galicia. I'm planning to move south into the Balkans and would appreciate your assurance that my northern border will remain secure. Perhaps we could even coordinate against Turkey if that interests you?
To [TUR]: Greetings from Vienna! I believe Austria and Turkey can coexist peacefully in the Balkans if we coordinate properly. I'm considering moving into Serbia while leaving Bulgaria for you. Would you be amenable to such an arrangement? I'd also be interested in your thoughts on Russia and Italy's intentions in our region.

Received by AUT:

From [ENG]: To all powers, England declares its intention to maintain the balance of power in Europe. We seek no territorial gains at this time, but will defend our interests and those of our allies. Let us strive for a peaceful and prosperous future.
From [RUS]: To AUT, we propose a temporary understanding regarding Galicia. Russia will not move into Galicia this turn if Austria refrains from supporting any moves against Warsaw. This will allow both of us to focus on other fronts. Is this acceptable?
From [TUR]: To Austria, I suggest we avoid conflict in the Balkans. I am interested in Bulgaria, and you are likely interested in Serbia. Perhaps we can come to an understanding regarding our spheres of influence in the region. What are your intentions?
From [GER]: Austria, I extend a hand in friendship. Given our geographical proximity, cooperation is essential. I am interested in understanding your ambitions in Bohemia and Tyrol. Perhaps we can find common ground in maintaining stability in Central Europe. What are your thoughts?
From [ITA]: Greetings Austria, I propose a non-aggression pact for the immediate future. I am focused on expansion elsewhere and wish to avoid conflict with you. Perhaps we can even coordinate against a common foe later. What are your thoughts?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I accept your proposal regarding Galicia. I will not support any moves against Warsaw, and I trust you will keep Galicia clear. I'm focusing on securing Serbia this turn while maintaining my position against potential Italian aggression. Would you be open to discussing a longer-term arrangement against Turkey once we've both secured our immediate objectives?
To [TUR]: I'm glad we're on the same page regarding the Balkans. I intend to move into Serbia this turn while leaving Bulgaria open for you. I suggest we formalize a non-aggression pact where you respect my claim to Serbia and Greece (eventually), and I'll respect your claim to Bulgaria and beyond. This arrangement would allow us both to focus on other fronts - you against Russia perhaps, while I deal with Italy.
To [ITA]: I appreciate your non-aggression proposal and accept it. To be specific, I commit to not attacking Venice this year if you agree not to move against Trieste. I'm focusing eastward into Serbia and eventually Greece. Perhaps we could coordinate against Turkey later? Their expansion in the Mediterranean would threaten both our interests. What are your plans for expansion, and how might we support each other?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your proposal for an alliance is intriguing. I agree that focusing eastward is wise. I am willing to support your move into Serbia, and I would like your support in taking Trieste. Let's coordinate our moves precisely. I am wary of Russia's expansionist tendencies and see Turkey as a potential long-term threat, but for now, let's focus on securing our immediate borders.
From [TUR]: To Austria, I am amenable to your suggestion of you moving into Serbia and me into Bulgaria. This seems like a mutually beneficial arrangement. Let's coordinate our moves to ensure success. What are your specific plans for Serbia?
From [RUS]: To AUT, we acknowledge your proposal for a non-aggression pact regarding Galicia. We are willing to refrain from moving into Galicia this turn if you guarantee that you will not support any moves against Warsaw. However, we are not interested in coordinating against Turkey at this time. Is our understanding acceptable?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I notice some confusion in our communications. To clarify: I have no intention of giving up Trieste - it's one of my home supply centers. I propose instead that I move to Serbia while you focus on Tunis, and we maintain a non-aggression pact regarding our borders. I'm willing to support you into Greece next year once I've secured Serbia. Does this arrangement work for you?
To [RUS]: Excellent, we have an agreement regarding Galicia and Warsaw. I'll be moving into Serbia this turn while maintaining my defensive posture. I understand your reluctance to coordinate against Turkey immediately, but I hope we can revisit this discussion in the future as the board develops. For now, our non-aggression pact serves both our interests well.
To [TUR]: I'm pleased we've reached an understanding about the Balkans. My specific plan is to move A BUD-SER this turn, while positioning my other units defensively. I suggest you take Bulgaria as discussed. This arrangement gives us both room to expand without conflict. After securing Serbia, I'll be looking toward Greece - would you be amenable to supporting each other's moves in the future against potential Russian expansion?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: To Austria, I agree to the arrangement regarding Serbia and Bulgaria. However, I am not willing to concede Greece to you at this time. I suggest we focus on Serbia and Bulgaria for now and revisit Greece later. I am also not interested in a non-aggression pact that includes Greece. Let's coordinate our moves this turn.
From [ITA]: Austria, I agree to your terms: I will not move against Trieste this year if you do not attack Venice. I am planning to move into Greece. Can you support A VEN to TRI? This will help secure our eastern flank and put pressure on Turkey. What are your thoughts on coordinating our moves in the Balkans?
From [RUS]: To AUT, we acknowledge your acceptance regarding Galicia. We will keep Galicia clear, and we expect you to refrain from supporting any moves against Warsaw. However, we must clarify our position: Russia intends to expand into Rumania. We advise you to focus your efforts on Serbia and Italy, as any interference in Rumania will be considered a hostile act. Do you understand?

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I must firmly decline your request to support you into Trieste - it's my home supply center. I'll be moving A BUD-SER as planned and maintaining my defensive posture elsewhere. I suggest you focus on Tunis for guaranteed growth. I remain committed to our non-aggression pact and am open to coordinating against Turkey in future turns, but I cannot support moves against my own territories.
To [RUS]: I understand your position on Rumania and will focus my attention on Serbia this turn. Our agreement regarding Galicia and Warsaw stands firm. I appreciate your clarity and look forward to maintaining peaceful relations on our shared border while we each pursue our immediate objectives elsewhere.
To [TUR]: I accept your position on Greece for now - let's focus on our immediate moves into Serbia and Bulgaria respectively. I'll be moving A BUD-SER this turn while maintaining defensive positions elsewhere. Once we've secured these initial gains, we can reassess the situation regarding Greece and potential coordination against common threats.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: To AUT, we acknowledge your acceptance regarding Galicia and Warsaw. We will keep Galicia clear, and we expect you to refrain from supporting any moves against Warsaw. Russia intends to expand into Rumania. Any interference in Rumania will be considered a hostile act. Focus on Serbia and Italy.
From [ITA]: Austria, there is no confusion. I understand you will not give up Trieste. I propose we focus on our respective expansions: you into Serbia, me into Greece and Tunis. I will support your move to Serbia. Do you support A VEN to TRI?
From [TUR]: To Austria, I will move into Bulgaria as discussed. I am not willing to commit to supporting your moves in Greece at this time. Let's focus on Serbia and Bulgaria for now. I will be watching your moves closely.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: This is the first turn of the game (Spring 1901). No moves have been made yet. I've established initial contact with my neighbors. Russia agreed to a non-aggression pact regarding Galicia, but firmly stated their intention to take Rumania. Italy initially seemed friendly but then bizarrely asked me to support them into my own home center of Trieste, which I firmly declined. Turkey and I reached an understanding about Serbia (for me) and Bulgaria (for them), though they were unwilling to discuss Greece's future. Germany reached out but our conversation didn't progress beyond initial pleasantries.
Intent: I plan to move A BUD-SER to secure my first expansion while maintaining defensive positions with my other units (A VIE holding or moving to TRI, F TRI holding). I'm wary of Italy's intentions after their strange request to support them into Trieste. My strategy is to secure Serbia first, then look toward Greece while maintaining vigilance against potential Italian aggression. I'll continue to honor my non-aggression pact with Russia regarding Galicia.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA-', 'AUT-TUR+', 'AUT-RUS+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Greetings Russia! I see you've secured Rumania as planned. I'm looking to move into Greece this turn with my fleet in Albania. Would you be willing to continue our non-aggression pact? I have no designs on Rumania and am happy to see you prosper there. Let me know if there's any way we can coordinate our efforts against Turkey in the future.
To [TUR]: Hello Turkey! I notice you've secured Bulgaria as we discussed. I'm planning to move my fleet from Albania into Greece this turn. I hope this aligns with your plans, as we previously didn't discuss Greece specifically. I value our understanding and would like to maintain good relations. Perhaps we can discuss longer-term arrangements for the Balkans?
To [ITA]: Greetings Italy. I notice your fleet in the Ionian and army in Apulia. I want to be transparent that I'm planning to move my fleet from Albania to Greece this turn. I hope we can establish a clear understanding about our respective spheres of influence. I have no designs on your home centers and would prefer we focus on other opportunities rather than conflict with each other.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I note your moves in the Balkans. I am focused on securing my borders and have no immediate designs on GAL. I hope we can maintain a neutral stance. What are your intentions regarding SER?
From [ITA]: Greetings, Austria. I propose we solidify our non-aggression pact. I intend to move A APU to VEN and F ION to TUN. Do you have any concerns with these moves? I am open to coordinating further actions in the Adriatic.
From [TUR]: Austria, I am willing to maintain the current status quo in the Balkans for the time being. I will not move against Serbia or Greece this turn. However, I expect reciprocal restraint from your side. Let's focus on consolidating our positions and avoiding unnecessary conflict. Do you agree?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I'm glad we're on the same page regarding Galicia. My intention for Serbia is to secure it as a supply center for Austria, which I've now done. I'm planning to move my fleet from Albania to Greece this turn while supporting that move with my army in Serbia. I have no designs on Rumania and am happy to continue our non-aggression understanding. Would you be open to discussing potential coordination against Turkey in the future once we've both consolidated our positions?
To [ITA]: I appreciate your transparency about your intended moves. I have no objection to your A APU-VEN and F ION-TUN plans. For my part, I intend to move F ALB-GRE with support from A SER, while moving A VIE-TRI to strengthen my position. I'm pleased we can establish this non-aggression understanding and would be open to discussing further coordination in the future. Let's maintain open communication about our intentions in the Adriatic region.
To [TUR]: I agree with maintaining stability in our region for now. However, I must inform you that I do intend to move my fleet from Albania to Greece this turn with support from my army in Serbia. I consider this consistent with our previous understanding where we agreed you would take Bulgaria and I would take Serbia, while Greece remained undiscussed. I have no immediate plans against your current positions and hope we can continue to coordinate our actions to avoid unnecessary conflict.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I appreciate your transparency. I have no intention of interfering with your move to Greece. I am moving A APU to VEN and F ION to TUN. I propose we coordinate our efforts to secure our respective spheres of influence. Perhaps we can discuss a joint strategy for the Balkans?
From [TUR]: Austria, I am pleased that we are in agreement regarding Bulgaria. However, your move into Greece was not part of our discussion. I am concerned about your intentions in the Aegean. I need assurances that your presence in Greece will not threaten my interests in the region. What are your long-term plans for the Balkans, and how do they align with my own?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I appreciate our understanding regarding Galicia and Rumania. Yes, I'd be open to discussing potential coordination against Turkey in the future once we've both secured our positions. For now, I'll be moving F ALB-GRE with support from A SER, while A VIE will move to TRI. I have no designs on Rumania and am happy to see you prosper there. Let me know your thoughts on potential future cooperation in the Balkans.
To [ITA]: I'm glad we're aligned on our respective moves. Your plans for A APU-VEN and F ION-TUN work well with my intentions for F ALB-GRE (supported by A SER) and A VIE-TRI. I'm interested in discussing a joint Balkan strategy - perhaps we could coordinate our efforts against Turkey once we've secured our immediate objectives? I value our non-aggression understanding and look forward to potential cooperation that benefits us both.
To [TUR]: I understand your concerns about Greece. My move there is primarily to secure a neutral supply center, not to threaten your position. My long-term vision for the Balkans involves Austria securing Serbia and Greece while respecting your control of Bulgaria and Constantinople. I have no immediate designs on your territory and would prefer we focus on other threats. Perhaps we could discuss a more formal arrangement regarding our spheres of influence in the region to avoid future misunderstandings?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: Austria, your move into Greece is unacceptable. It directly threatens my interests in the Aegean. I demand that you withdraw your fleet from Greece immediately. If you refuse, I will be forced to take action to protect my interests. I am moving A BUL to GRE. Consider this a warning.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am glad we have reached an understanding. I will proceed with A APU to VEN and F ION to TUN. I support your move of F ALB to GRE with support from A SER. Let's continue to monitor the situation in the Balkans and Adriatic.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I'm proceeding with F ALB-GRE (supported by A SER) and A VIE-TRI as discussed. I value our non-aggression understanding and look forward to potential future cooperation against Turkey once we've both consolidated our positions. I have no designs on Rumania and wish you continued success there. Let's maintain our open communication as the game progresses.
To [ITA]: Italy, I'm moving forward with F ALB-GRE (supported by A SER) and A VIE-TRI as we discussed. I appreciate your support for my move into Greece and your transparency about your own plans. I look forward to our continued non-aggression and potential future coordination against Turkey. Let's keep our communication open about developments in the Adriatic and Balkans.
To [TUR]: Turkey, I understand your concerns but must proceed with my move into Greece as it's essential for my strategic position. I assure you this isn't meant as aggression against you but simply to secure a neutral supply center. I still respect your position in Bulgaria and have no immediate designs on your territory. I hope we can avoid unnecessary conflict and perhaps discuss a more formal arrangement about our respective spheres of influence in the future.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving A APU to VEN and F ION to TUN. I support your move of F ALB to GRE with support from A SER and A VIE to TRI. Let's discuss coordinating against Turkey in the future. I value our non-aggression pact.
From [TUR]: Austria, your move into Greece is a hostile act. I will not tolerate your presence in the Aegean. I am moving A BUL to GRE. I suggest you reconsider your position and withdraw your fleet. I will not accept any long-term arrangements that threaten my interests in the Balkans.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: In Spring 1901, I successfully moved into Serbia with A BUD-SER and secured Albania with F TRI-ALB. My attempt to move into Galicia was blocked by Russia's A WAR-GAL. Russia secured Rumania, Turkey moved into Bulgaria and Armenia, while Italy positioned units in the Ionian Sea and Apulia. I informed all Balkan powers of my intention to move into Greece. Italy was supportive and confirmed non-aggression, planning A APU-VEN and F ION-TUN. Russia maintained our non-aggression understanding regarding Galicia and Rumania. Turkey initially seemed accepting of the status quo but became hostile when I clarified my Greece plans, threatening to move A BUL-GRE and demanding I withdraw.
Intent: I will proceed with F ALB-GRE supported by A SER to secure Greece as a supply center. I'll also move A VIE-TRI to strengthen my home position. I'm maintaining non-aggression with Russia and Italy while preparing for potential conflict with Turkey. Long-term, I aim to coordinate with Italy and possibly Russia against Turkey once our positions are secured.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA+', 'AUT-TUR--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Italy, I see we both have interests in the Balkans. I propose we coordinate our efforts - I'll focus on securing my position in Greece while you focus on your expansion in the Mediterranean. I'm concerned about Turkish aggression and would appreciate your support against them. What are your plans this turn? I'm considering moving against Bulgaria with support from Greece.
To [RUS]: Russia, our non-aggression pact has served us well. I'm planning to move against Turkey in Bulgaria this turn and would appreciate your support or at least non-interference. In return, I'll continue to respect your position in Rumania and can offer support against Turkey in the Black Sea region in the future. What are your plans for this turn?
To [GER]: Germany, I see you're making good progress in the north. I'm currently engaged with Turkey in the Balkans and would appreciate knowing your intentions toward Russia. If you're planning any moves against them, I could coordinate with you to apply pressure from multiple fronts. Alternatively, if you're looking east, we could discuss a potential alliance against Russia in the future.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: To AUT, your move into Greece is concerning. I need assurances that you will not expand further into the Balkans. I propose a temporary agreement: I will not move against Serbia if you withdraw from Greece. What are your thoughts?
From [ITA]: Greetings, Austria. I appreciate your support in Greece. I propose a coordinated effort to contain Turkish expansion. I am willing to support your moves in the Balkans if you continue to support my moves in the Mediterranean. What are your intentions regarding Serbia and Rumania?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I hope our non-aggression pact continues to hold. I am focused on the north and have no intentions of moving against you. I am open to discussing future cooperation against TUR, should the opportunity arise. What are your current strategic goals?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [TUR]: Turkey, I understand your concerns, but I cannot withdraw from Greece as it's vital to my strategic position. Instead, I propose a different arrangement: I will not move against Constantinople if you focus your expansion eastward toward Russia. I'm planning to move against Bulgaria this turn with support from Greece - this is non-negotiable given your hostility. I suggest you reposition to avoid conflict with me and focus on more promising fronts.
To [ITA]: Italy, I'm glad we're aligned on containing Turkey. This turn I'm planning to attack Bulgaria with A SER-BUL supported by F GRE. I'd appreciate if you could maintain pressure on Turkey from the Mediterranean to prevent them from reinforcing Bulgaria. Regarding Serbia, it's firmly in my sphere of influence, while Rumania is currently Russian-controlled. I'm open to coordinating with you against Turkey in the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean in future turns.
To [RUS]: Russia, I'm pleased our non-aggression continues. My current goal is containing Turkish expansion in the Balkans - I'm planning to move A SER-BUL with support from F GRE this turn. Your fleet in Rumania could be instrumental in pressuring Turkey from multiple fronts. Would you consider supporting my move into Bulgaria or at least ensuring Turkey can't support their defense? In return, I'll continue respecting your position in Rumania and can offer support against Turkey in the Black Sea.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: To AUT, your move into Greece is still a major concern. I cannot accept your continued presence there. I propose a more concrete agreement: you withdraw from GRE, and I guarantee not to move against SER or BUD. This is a temporary measure to de-escalate tensions in the Balkans.
From [ITA]: Austria, I agree that containing Turkey is a priority. I will support your move against Bulgaria. In return, I need your continued support in Tunis. I am considering moving A APU to Ionian Sea to support F TUN. What are your specific orders for Greece and Bulgaria?
From [GER]: Greetings, RUS and AUT. RUS, I confirm that A PRU is moving to WAR. I appreciate your support. AUT, I am currently focused on securing my borders and expanding my influence in Scandinavia and the Baltic. I am not planning any immediate moves against Russia, but I am open to discussing future cooperation against them if the opportunity arises. Let's maintain communication and coordinate our efforts to achieve our mutual goals.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Excellent, I'm moving A SER-BUL with F GRE supporting. Your Mediterranean pressure on Turkey is exactly what we need. I'll be moving A VIE-TYR and A TRI supporting that move to strengthen our shared border while maintaining our alliance. I have no designs on your territory - our cooperation against Turkey is far more valuable. Let me know if you need any specific support in future turns.
To [RUS]: I'm proceeding with A SER-BUL supported by F GRE this turn. Your non-interference would be greatly appreciated. I notice Germany mentioned moving to Warsaw - are you concerned about this? If you need to focus on defending against Germany, I can offer to maintain our non-aggression pact and potentially support you against German aggression in the future. Our mutual interest in containing Turkey remains strong.
To [TUR]: I cannot withdraw from Greece as you request - it's a critical position for me. My forces will be moving against Bulgaria this turn with full support. However, I'm willing to discuss a future arrangement where we both cease hostilities after this move and establish a stable border. If you redirect your focus toward Russia or the Mediterranean, I could agree not to press further into your territory after securing Bulgaria.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: To AUT, your move against BUL is unacceptable. I will not reposition to avoid conflict. I will move A BUL to GRE to contest your control. I suggest you reconsider your aggressive stance. I am open to a negotiated settlement, but only if it respects my interests in the Balkans. Withdraw from GRE, and we can talk.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I will not support your move into BUL. My focus is on securing RUM and coordinating with TUR. I suggest you reconsider your strategy and focus on containing TUR in other areas. I am open to discussing future cooperation against TUR, but only if it aligns with my strategic goals. I am not willing to compromise my position in RUM.
From [ITA]: Austria, excellent. I will support your move against Bulgaria by positioning my fleet in the Ionian Sea. This will deter Turkish reinforcements. I propose we coordinate further attacks on Turkish supply centers in the future, specifically Smyrna and Ankara. What are your thoughts on a joint naval assault on Smyrna next turn?

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I'm proceeding with A SER-BUL supported by F GRE as planned. A VIE-TYR and A TRI supporting that move will strengthen our shared border while maintaining our alliance. I'm excited about our future coordination against Turkey - your idea for a joint naval assault on Smyrna is excellent. Let's discuss specific plans for that next turn after we secure Bulgaria.
To [RUS]: I understand your position on Bulgaria and Rumania. I'll be proceeding with my planned move against Bulgaria this turn, but I remain committed to our non-aggression pact regarding your territories. I hope we can find common ground in the future against Turkey, as they remain a threat to both our interests in the region. Let me know if Germany's movements concern you - I could be a valuable ally against them.
To [TUR]: I see we've reached an impasse. I will proceed with my planned moves this turn. However, I remain open to discussing a stable border arrangement in the future once the current situation resolves. We both stand to lose from prolonged conflict, and I believe we could eventually find a mutually acceptable arrangement that respects both our spheres of influence.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: To AUT, your aggression is noted. I will contest your move into BUL with A BUL to GRE. Consider this your final warning. I will not negotiate while you threaten my territories. Prepare for war.
From [ITA]: Austria, our alliance against Turkey is proving fruitful. I will continue to pressure them in the Mediterranean. I am moving A APU to VEN, A VEN to TYR, F TUN to ION, and holding A NAP. Let's discuss specific targets for next turn. I suggest Smyrna and Ankara.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I will not support your move into BUL. My focus is on securing RUM and coordinating with TUR. I suggest you reconsider your strategy and focus on containing TUR in other areas. I am open to discussing future cooperation against TUR, but only if it aligns with my strategic goals. I am not willing to compromise my position in RUM. I am concerned about GER moving to WAR.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: In F1901M, I successfully took Greece with support from Serbia while moving to Trieste. Italy attempted to move into Trieste but failed. Turkey tried to take Greece but was blocked. Russia attempted to move to Prussia but was unsuccessful. I built two new armies in Budapest and Trieste, strengthening my position in the Balkans. Italy and I agreed to coordinate against Turkey, with Italy supporting my moves in the Balkans while I support their Mediterranean expansion. Turkey demanded I withdraw from Greece, which I refused. Russia was unwilling to support my move into Bulgaria, preferring to secure Rumania and coordinate with Turkey. Italy proposed a joint naval assault on Smyrna for the future. Turkey threatened war if I proceed with my attack on Bulgaria.
Intent: I will proceed with A SER-BUL supported by F GRE to take Bulgaria from Turkey. I'll move A VIE-TYR and have A TRI support that move to strengthen my border with Italy while maintaining our alliance. A BUD will hold. My strategy is to contain Turkey in the Balkans while maintaining my non-aggression pact with Russia and strengthening my alliance with Italy for future operations against Turkish centers.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA++', 'AUT-RUS~']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Our alliance has been fruitful so far. I'm planning to attack Venice with A TRI supported by A TYR this turn to secure our position in the region. This will help us both against Turkey - I'll continue holding Bulgaria with support from Greece to maintain pressure on the Turks. Would you consider moving your fleet in ION to support my position in Greece or to pressure Turkey's AEG fleet?
To [RUS]: I notice Turkey is becoming increasingly aggressive in the Balkans. I propose we coordinate to contain their expansion - I'll hold Bulgaria with support while you secure Rumania. This arrangement gives us both security while preventing Turkish dominance. I have no designs on your territory and would prefer we maintain our non-aggression understanding. What are your thoughts on the Turkish threat?
To [GER]: I see you've made significant gains in the north. I'd like to propose a non-aggression pact between us, as we have no immediate territorial conflicts. My focus remains in the Balkans against Turkey, while you seem to be expanding successfully northward. Perhaps we could discuss potential coordination against mutual threats in the future?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, our moves bounced last turn. I propose A VEN supports A TRI to TYR, A APU supports A ROM to VEN, A ROM moves to VEN, and F ION moves to TUN. This secures Tunis and puts pressure on Tyrol. Do you agree?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am concerned about your presence in BUL. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you withdraw from BUL. What are your intentions in the Balkans?
From [TUR]: AUT, your aggression in the Balkans is unacceptable. Your occupation of BUL is a direct threat to my interests. I demand that you withdraw your forces from BUL immediately. If you refuse, I will be forced to take action to protect my territories.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I see we had a misunderstanding last turn. Let me be clear: I'm planning to attack Venice with A TRI supported by A TYR this turn. This is strategically vital for containing Turkey, who is becoming increasingly hostile. Your proposed moves would leave me vulnerable. Instead, I suggest you move A VEN to PIE or hold, while using F ION to pressure Turkey in AEG. Our alliance against Turkey should be our priority - they're already threatening both of us.
To [RUS]: I understand your concerns about Bulgaria, but my presence there is defensive against Turkish aggression. Turkey has been hostile and threatening, making them a mutual threat to both of us. I propose we maintain our non-aggression in GAL and RUM while I continue to contain Turkey in the Balkans. This arrangement benefits us both - you secure your southern flank while I prevent Turkish expansion. What specific concerns do you have about my position in Bulgaria?
To [TUR]: Your demand for withdrawal from Bulgaria is rejected. You've been consistently hostile toward me while I've attempted reasonable diplomacy. My forces in Bulgaria are there to secure my position against your aggression, as evidenced by your threats. I'm prepared to discuss a more balanced arrangement in the Balkans, but not under threats. If you want peace, propose a specific arrangement that respects both our interests rather than making demands.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I cannot allow you to attack Venice. That is unacceptable. I propose instead we focus on Turkey. I will move F ION to AEG to pressure Turkey's fleet. Can you support me in Greece and Bulgaria to further weaken them?
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of BUL is unacceptable. I am willing to negotiate a peaceful resolution, but only if you withdraw your forces immediately. If you refuse, I will be forced to take action to protect my territories. What are your terms for withdrawal?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I appreciate your concern about TUR. However, I have an understanding with TUR regarding the Balkans. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you withdraw from BUL. I am willing to consider future cooperation against TUR if they become too aggressive, but for now, I must honor my agreement. What are your intentions for TYR?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I understand your concerns about Venice, but Turkey is our mutual threat. I'm modifying my plans - I'll support-hold in Bulgaria with Greece's support while moving A TYR to support A TRI. If you move F ION to AEG as proposed, we can coordinate a strong anti-Turkish position. I won't attack Venice if you commit to pressuring Turkey's fleet. This arrangement protects both our interests while focusing our efforts against the real threat in the east.
To [RUS]: I appreciate your candor regarding your Turkish arrangement. My presence in Bulgaria is purely defensive against Turkish aggression - they've been consistently hostile. I have no designs on Rumania and will maintain our non-aggression in Galicia. Regarding Tyrol, I'm positioning there to secure my western border with Italy, not for any offensive purpose. I suggest we continue our non-interference policy while monitoring Turkish expansion, which threatens us both long-term.
To [TUR]: Your demand for immediate withdrawal from Bulgaria without offering anything in return is unreasonable diplomacy. I'm willing to discuss a more balanced arrangement in the Balkans that respects both our interests, but not under one-sided ultimatums. If you want peace, propose specific terms that acknowledge my legitimate security concerns in the region. Until then, I will maintain my defensive posture against your continued threats.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your refusal to withdraw from BUL is noted. However, I am willing to offer a compromise. I will not attack BUL this turn if you agree to withdraw your forces from GRE. This will create a more balanced situation in the Balkans and allow us to focus on other threats. What do you say?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I must honor my agreement with TUR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you withdraw from BUL. I am willing to consider future cooperation against TUR if they become too aggressive. What are your intentions for TYR? I need to know if you are planning to move into VEN.
From [ITA]: Austria, your attack on Venice is unacceptable. It would be a betrayal of our alliance. I propose we focus on Turkey. I will move F ION to AEG to pressure Turkey's fleet. Support me in Greece and Bulgaria to further weaken them. If you attack Venice, I will be forced to defend it.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I understand your concerns about Venice. I'll modify my plans and will NOT attack Venice this turn. Instead, I'll focus on defending against Turkey by holding Bulgaria with support from Greece. Let's coordinate against Turkey - your F ION to AEG would be extremely valuable. I remain committed to our alliance and believe our mutual interest lies in containing Turkish expansion rather than fighting each other.
To [RUS]: I respect your position regarding Turkey. To clarify, I have no plans to move into Rumania and will maintain our non-aggression in Galicia. My A TYR will support A TRI, not attack Venice, as I'm focusing on securing my position against Turkey. I hope we can continue our policy of non-interference while remaining vigilant about Turkish expansion in the Balkans, which could eventually threaten both our positions.
To [TUR]: Your compromise is noted but rejected. I will not withdraw from Greece while you maintain threatening forces on all sides of my position. I'm maintaining my defensive posture in Bulgaria with support from Greece this turn. If you truly want peace, I suggest a demilitarized zone in the Balkans where neither of us attacks the other's current positions. This would allow both of us security while we focus elsewhere.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I will move F ION to AEG. I expect you to support me in Greece and Bulgaria. Do not attack Venice. This is my final offer.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I must honor my agreement with TUR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you withdraw from BUL. I am willing to consider future cooperation against TUR if they become too aggressive. I am moving A UKR to WAR.
From [TUR]: AUT, I see no room for compromise. Your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is a direct threat to my interests. I will take action to protect my territories. Consider this my final warning.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully took Bulgaria from Turkey with support from Greece, while also moving A Vienna to Tyrolia. Turkey was forced to retreat to Constantinople. Italy attempted to move into Tyrolia but was bounced. Russia is consolidating in Ukraine and Sevastopol, while Germany took Warsaw and made gains in the north. Italy demanded I not attack Venice and offered to move F ION to AEG to pressure Turkey if I support them. Russia has an arrangement with Turkey and wants me to withdraw from Bulgaria while maintaining non-aggression in Galicia. Turkey was hostile throughout, demanding withdrawal from Bulgaria and later proposing I leave Greece in exchange for temporary peace in Bulgaria. All powers rejected compromise.
Intent: I'll maintain my defensive position in Bulgaria with support from Greece to prevent Turkish recapture. I won't attack Venice as promised to Italy, hoping they follow through on moving F ION to AEG. I'll use A TYR to support A TRI, securing my western border. My moves: A BUL H, F GRE S A BUL, A TYR S A TRI, A TRI H, A BUD H. This balances defense against Turkey while honoring my commitment to Italy.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA+', 'AUT-RUS-']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I've kept my promise not to attack Venice and hope you'll move your fleet to the Aegean as discussed. I'm maintaining my position in Bulgaria with Greek support to prevent Turkish recapture. Would you consider supporting my F GRE-AEG this turn? This would put significant pressure on Turkey and potentially open a path to Constantinople.
To [RUS]: I propose a mutual non-aggression pact. I'll keep my forces out of Galicia and won't threaten Rumania if you agree not to support Turkish moves against my positions in Bulgaria and Greece. We both benefit from stability on our shared border while we pursue opportunities elsewhere. What do you say?
To [GER]: I notice you've made significant gains in the north. I propose we establish a non-aggression understanding regarding our shared borders. I have no designs on your territory and hope you feel similarly. Perhaps we could even coordinate against Russia in the future if circumstances warrant it?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am moving A UKR to WAR. This is merely a defensive maneuver. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am open to discussing future cooperation against TUR.
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued presence in BUL is unacceptable. I demand you withdraw your forces immediately. What are your intentions regarding GRE? I am prepared to defend my interests in the Balkans.
From [ITA]: Greetings, Austria. I propose a coordinated attack on Turkey this turn. I will move F ION to AEG to pressure them. Can you support this with your fleet? Also, I am concerned about your position in Tyrol. I need assurances you will not move against Venice.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I'm happy to support your F ION-AEG move with my F GRE. This coordinated attack on Turkey will put significant pressure on them. Regarding Tyrol, I assure you I have no intention of moving against Venice - my position there is purely defensive against potential German aggression. I suggest we continue our cooperation against Turkey with the goal of dismantling their position in the east.
To [RUS]: I accept your proposal to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I won't move against either territory and appreciate your defensive posture. Regarding Turkey, I believe they're weakened and vulnerable - if you're interested in cooperation against them, I could support your F RUM into the Black Sea while you support my move from Bulgaria into Constantinople. This would significantly damage Turkey's position and benefit us both.
To [TUR]: I have no intention of withdrawing from Bulgaria - it's now a vital part of my defensive perimeter. My presence in Greece is similarly permanent. However, I'm willing to discuss a temporary non-aggression agreement if you cease your attempts to recapture Bulgaria and focus your attention elsewhere. Otherwise, I'm coordinating with both Italy and Russia to continue pressure on your position.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. My move of A UKR to WAR is a defensive maneuver against GER. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am open to discussing future cooperation against TUR, but I will not commit to any alliances at this time. I will not support Turkish moves against your positions in Bulgaria and Greece if you do not threaten RUM.
From [ITA]: Austria, I will support your F GRE to AEG. I am moving F ION to TYS to avoid conflict with you in the Aegean and to prepare for an attack on Marseilles. I need your assurance that you will not move into Trieste or Tyrol. Can we agree on this?
From [TUR]: AUT, your presence in BUL and GRE is a direct threat. I demand you withdraw from BUL immediately. I am prepared to use force to defend my interests in the Balkans. What is your response? I am willing to negotiate a peaceful resolution, but only if you are willing to compromise.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I'm confused by your change of plans - you said you'd move to AEG but now you're going to TYS? I was counting on our coordinated pressure against Turkey. Nevertheless, I assure you I won't move against Venice or Trieste. I'll order F GRE-AEG this turn with A BUL supporting the move. This should put significant pressure on Turkey while you pursue your western strategy. Let me know if you'd still be willing to support this move from ION.
To [RUS]: I accept your terms regarding GAL and RUM. I won't threaten either territory and appreciate your commitment not to support Turkish moves against my positions. I understand your defensive move to WAR against Germany. Would you consider supporting my F GRE-AEG move this turn? This would put pressure on Turkey without directly threatening your interests, and could open future opportunities for both of us if Turkey is weakened.
To [TUR]: I have no intention of withdrawing from Bulgaria or Greece - they are now integral to my defensive perimeter. However, I'm willing to discuss a temporary non-aggression agreement if you cease your attempts to recapture these territories. I'm moving F GRE-AEG this turn with support from Bulgaria. If you want to avoid further conflict, I suggest you focus your attention eastward rather than continuing this costly struggle in the Balkans.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I misspoke. I will support your F GRE to AEG. I will move F ION to ADR to support you and to be ready to move against Greece if you betray me. I need your absolute guarantee that you will not move into Trieste or Tyrol. If you do, I will turn against you without hesitation.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I appreciate your offer of cooperation against TUR. However, I am not ready to commit to such an alliance at this time. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not support Turkish moves against your positions in Bulgaria and Greece if you do not threaten RUM. I am moving A UKR to SEV.
From [TUR]: AUT, your refusal to withdraw from BUL is unacceptable. I am prepared to use force to defend my interests in the Balkans. Your coordination with ITA and RUS is noted, but I am not intimidated. I will move my forces to challenge your position in BUL. Prepare for war.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I'll proceed with F GRE-AEG supported by A BUL this turn as we discussed. I guarantee I won't move into Venice or Trieste - my forces in TYR and TRI will remain defensive. Let's continue our coordination against Turkey and weaken their position in the east. Once we've made progress there, we can discuss further opportunities for mutual gain.
To [RUS]: I accept our mutual non-aggression regarding GAL and RUM. I'll maintain my defensive posture in BUL with support from GRE while you secure your position against Germany. I understand you're not ready for direct action against Turkey, but I hope we can revisit this possibility in the future when circumstances are more favorable. For now, I'm satisfied with our border arrangement.
To [TUR]: Your threats are noted but will not change my position. Bulgaria and Greece are now firmly under my control and will remain so. I'm moving F GRE-AEG this turn with support from Bulgaria to further pressure your position. I suggest you reconsider your stance - continuing this conflict only weakens us both while others grow stronger. I remain open to discussing terms that recognize the current territorial reality.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I appreciate your offer of cooperation against TUR. However, I am not ready to commit to such an alliance at this time. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not support Turkish moves against your positions in Bulgaria and Greece if you do not threaten RUM. I am moving A UKR to WAR.
From [TUR]: AUT, your refusal to withdraw from BUL is unacceptable. I am moving A CON to BUL, supported by F AEG. Prepare for war. I will not back down. Your threats are meaningless. I will take what is rightfully mine.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving F ION to ADR as planned. I need you to confirm that you are moving F GRE to AEG and A BUL is supporting. If you betray me, I will make you regret it. This is your last chance to prove your loyalty.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully defended Bulgaria with support from Greece against Turkish attempts to capture it. I also maintained my position in Trieste and Tyrol against potential Italian aggression. I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my position. England gained Sweden, France secured Belgium and Tunisia, while Germany failed to capture Denmark but took Warsaw. Russia established itself in Rumania, and Turkey's attempt to take Bulgaria was repelled. Italy initially proposed a coordinated attack on Turkey with F ION-AEG but later changed to moving F ION-ADR while still supporting my move to AEG. They demanded guarantees I won't attack Venice or Trieste. Russia proposed a non-aggression pact regarding Galicia and Rumania, moving defensively against Germany. Turkey was hostile, demanding withdrawal from Bulgaria and threatening military action. I maintained firm positions with all powers, refusing to abandon my Balkan territories while seeking coordination against Turkey.
Intent: I will order F GRE-AEG supported by A BUL to pressure Turkey's position. A TYR and A TRI will hold defensively to reassure Italy. A VIE will hold to protect against any German moves, while A BUD will remain in place to guard against Russian aggression. My strategy is to continue expanding eastward against Turkey while maintaining my alliance with Italy and the non-aggression understanding with Russia. I'm wary of Turkey's continued hostility and will need to ensure my Balkan holdings remain secure.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-RUS~']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I see you've moved to the Adriatic, which I understand is a defensive position for you. I remain committed to our understanding - I won't attack Venice and will focus on Turkey. I propose I move A TYR to support A TRI to Venice, while you support this move with F ADR. This would give us a strong position against Turkey while securing our alliance. Alternatively, if you prefer to maintain Venice, I can support you elsewhere or hold my current positions.
To [RUS]: I notice tensions rising between you and Germany with their move to Warsaw. I propose we maintain our non-aggression understanding regarding Galicia and Rumania. I'm planning to move A VIE to Galicia as a defensive measure against German expansion, not as a threat to your position. I'm willing to support your F RUM if you're concerned about Turkish aggression, as I believe containing Turkey serves both our interests.
To [TUR]: The current conflict between us benefits neither of our nations. I propose a ceasefire where I maintain Bulgaria but don't advance further into your territory. In return, you cease attacks on my positions. This would allow us both to focus on other fronts - you could pressure Russia in the Black Sea while I address Italian movements. A stable eastern Mediterranean serves both our interests better than continued warfare.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: To AUT, I propose maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you do not move into RUM. Do you agree to this?
From [ITA]: Greetings, Austria. I see our moves last turn resulted in a stalemate in Tyrol. I propose we coordinate more closely this turn. I am willing to support your advance into Trieste if you support my move into Albania. This will allow us to both expand our influence in the Balkans. What are your thoughts?
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is unacceptable. I demand you withdraw your forces immediately. Your actions are destabilizing the region and threaten the peace. I will not tolerate your expansionism any further.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I have no intention of attacking Venice - my focus remains on Turkey. I'm concerned about your proposal to move into Albania as this would threaten my position in Greece. Instead, I propose I hold TYR and TRI defensively while you use ADR to support my F GRE against Turkish forces in AEG. This would pressure Turkey while maintaining our alliance. Alternatively, I could support your move into Tunis or another Mediterranean target if you prefer.
To [RUS]: I agree to maintain the status quo regarding GAL and RUM. I won't move into RUM if you don't move into GAL. I'm concerned about Germany's expansion into Warsaw - this threatens both our positions. Would you consider coordinating against German expansion? I could move A VIE to GAL to block further German advances while you secure your northern territories. This would benefit us both while maintaining our non-aggression understanding.
To [TUR]: Your demands are unreasonable given the current strategic situation. I've secured my position in BUL and GRE through legitimate military action. Rather than continuing this conflict, I propose a pragmatic solution: I maintain my current territories but agree not to advance further into CON or SMY. This allows you to focus on defending your remaining centers and potentially expanding elsewhere. A ceasefire benefits us both more than continued hostilities.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: To AUT, I agree to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you do not move into RUM. I am concerned about Turkish aggression and would welcome your support for F RUM if you are willing to offer it.
From [TUR]: AUT, your proposal for a ceasefire is unacceptable. I will not allow you to maintain control of BUL and GRE. I demand you withdraw your forces immediately. If you refuse, I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans and seek alliances with other powers to contain your aggression.
From [ITA]: Austria, I appreciate your commitment. I am willing to support your move into Trieste with F ADR. However, I cannot support A TYR to Venice, as that would leave me vulnerable to France. Instead, I propose F ADR supports A TRI to Venice, and I will move A VEN to Trieste to support you further. This secures our alliance and puts pressure on Turkey.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I appreciate your proposal, but I'm concerned about the arrangement. I cannot allow you to move into Trieste - it's my home center. Instead, I propose: I'll hold TRI and TYR defensively, you maintain VEN, and we focus on pressuring Turkey. I could support your F ADR into ION or you could support my F GRE against Turkish forces. Let's coordinate against Turkey rather than risking misunderstandings between us.
To [RUS]: I'm glad we agree on maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM. I'm willing to support F RUM against Turkish aggression - specifically, I can have A BUL support F RUM this turn if that would be helpful. In return, I'd appreciate your neutrality regarding my position in Bulgaria. Germany's expansion into Warsaw concerns me as well - perhaps we should discuss coordinating against their eastern advances in the future.
To [TUR]: Your continued hostility only ensures mutual destruction while others grow stronger. I've secured BUL and GRE through legitimate military action and will defend these positions. However, I have no immediate designs on CON or SMY. If you persist with this conflict, I'll be forced to coordinate more aggressively with Italy and Russia against your remaining centers. A pragmatic ceasefire would serve both our interests better than continued warfare.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: To AUT, I agree to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you do not move into RUM. I am concerned about GER's move to WAR. I will not coordinate against GER at this time, but I will monitor their actions closely. I appreciate your offer of support for F RUM, but I will rely on my alliance with TUR for now.
From [ITA]: Austria, I understand your concern about Albania. I am willing to forgo Albania for now. I agree to support your F GRE against Turkish forces in AEG with F ADR. I will also move A VEN to TRI to further support your position. This will put significant pressure on Turkey. Do you agree to these moves?
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is unacceptable. Your proposal for a ceasefire is a non-starter. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans and seek alliances with other powers to contain your aggression. Withdraw your forces from BUL and GRE, or face the consequences.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I appreciate your support against Turkey, but I cannot allow you to move into Trieste - it's my home center. I'll order A TYR to support A TRI against any potential attacks, while F GRE will attempt to move to AEG with support from A BUL. If you could support this with F ADR, it would put significant pressure on Turkey. I remain committed to our alliance and won't attack Venice.
To [RUS]: I'll honor our agreement regarding GAL and RUM. I'm ordering A BUL to support F RUM this turn as a gesture of goodwill, while A VIE will move to GAL to counter German expansion from Warsaw. My A BUD will move to SER to strengthen my Balkan position. I hope this demonstrates my commitment to cooperation despite your alliance with Turkey, and I remain open to further coordination against German expansion in the east.
To [TUR]: Your continued hostility leaves me no choice but to defend my positions in BUL and GRE while seeking further coordination with Italy and Russia. I've secured these territories through legitimate military action and will not withdraw. I'm ordering F GRE to AEG supported by A BUL this turn to pressure your position. A diplomatic solution would still be preferable, but I'm prepared for continued conflict if necessary.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: To AUT, I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move into GAL if you do not move into RUM. I am not interested in coordinating against GER at this time. I will rely on my alliance with TUR for now.
From [ITA]: Austria, I cannot allow you to dictate my moves. I will move A VEN to TRI. I will support your F GRE against Turkish forces in AEG with F ADR. This is my final offer. Accept it or face the consequences.
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is unacceptable. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans and seek alliances with other powers to contain your aggression. Withdraw your forces from BUL and GRE, or face the consequences. This is my final offer.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I attempted to move F GRE to AEG but was blocked by Turkish support. I held most of my other units defensively. Turkey tried to take Bulgaria with support from their fleet in AEG, but failed. Russia moved into Rumania and the Black Sea with support. Italy tried to move into Tyrol but was unsuccessful. Germany moved into Belgium and attempted to move to Ukraine. Russia proposed a non-aggression pact regarding Galicia and Rumania, which I agreed to. Italy initially suggested moving into Albania, then proposed moving into Trieste, which I firmly rejected as it's my home center. Italy became increasingly aggressive, threatening consequences if I didn't accept their demands. Turkey remained hostile, demanding withdrawal from Bulgaria and Greece, refusing any ceasefire proposals.
Intent: I will defend my territories against both Turkish and Italian threats. I'll order A TYR to support A TRI to hold against Italy's threatened move to Trieste. F GRE will attempt to move to AEG with support from A BUL to pressure Turkey. A VIE will move to GAL to counter German expansion, while A BUD will move to SER to strengthen my Balkan position. I'm maintaining the appearance of cooperation with Russia while preparing for potential conflict with Italy.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA-']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I see your fleet in the Adriatic and army in Venice as direct threats to my territory. I propose a mutual stand-down: I won't attack Venice if you withdraw F ADR and don't move against Trieste. In return, I can support your moves elsewhere against Turkey. We both benefit more from cooperation than conflict - what do you say?
To [TUR]: The current hostilities between us serve neither of our interests while others grow stronger. I propose a ceasefire: I'll hold my current positions without further aggression if you agree not to attack my territories. This would allow us both to focus on more pressing threats - Russia's fleet in Rumania threatens both of us, and Italy is positioning against you in the Mediterranean.
To [RUS]: I notice Germany has taken Moscow while positioning against you in Ukraine. I'm concerned about their expansion and propose we maintain our non-aggression pact. I'll continue to respect your position in Rumania if you'll respect mine in the Balkans. Additionally, would you consider supporting my fleet in Greece to ION to counter the French presence there?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I have no intention of attacking you at this time. Let's focus on other threats.
From [TUR]: AUT, I demand you withdraw from BUL and GRE immediately. Your continued occupation of these territories is unacceptable and will be met with force. I am prepared to defend my interests in the Balkans. What are your intentions?
From [ITA]: Greetings, Austria. I am concerned about your continued presence in Trieste. I propose a coordinated effort against Turkey. I will support your fleet in Greece if you allow me to occupy Trieste. This will allow us to effectively dismantle Turkey and secure our respective interests in the region. What are your thoughts?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Your proposal is unacceptable. Trieste is my home center and I will defend it with all available force. I'm ordering A TYR to support A TRI and will not yield this territory. However, I still see value in cooperation against Turkey - I can support your fleet in ADR to AEG next turn if you withdraw from my borders now. We can coordinate effectively against Turkey without you attempting to take my home centers.
To [RUS]: I agree to maintain our non-aggression regarding GAL and RUM. Germany's capture of Moscow is concerning - they're becoming the dominant power with 6 centers. I suggest we both focus on containing German expansion while respecting each other's spheres of influence. I'll continue to honor our arrangement regarding Galicia and Rumania if you'll respect my position in the Balkans. Would you consider coordinating against Turkey to prevent them from threatening either of us?
To [TUR]: I have no intention of withdrawing from territories I rightfully control. However, I'm willing to discuss a limited ceasefire where I don't advance beyond my current positions if you agree to the same. Russia's fleet in Rumania threatens both of us, and Italy is positioning against you in the Mediterranean. We gain nothing from continued conflict while others grow stronger around us. What specific arrangement would you consider acceptable to reduce tensions between us?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am concerned about GER's expansion into MOS and UKR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will respect your position in the Balkans if you respect mine in RUM. I am not interested in supporting your fleet in GRE to ION.
From [TUR]: AUT, your ceasefire proposal is unacceptable while you occupy BUL and GRE. I demand you withdraw immediately. I am not concerned about RUS's fleet in RUM, as I have an agreement with them. I am more concerned about your aggression in the Balkans. Withdraw from BUL and GRE, or face the consequences.
From [ITA]: Austria, your concern is noted. I propose F ADR supports A VEN to TRI. In return, I will support F GRE to AEG. This secures Trieste for you and opens Turkey for both of us. Do we have an agreement?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Your proposal is completely unacceptable. I will not allow you to take Trieste under any circumstances - it's my home center and I will defend it with all my forces. I'm ordering A TYR to support A TRI against any attack. However, I still see value in coordinating against Turkey. If you withdraw F ADR and don't attack my territories, I can support your moves against Turkish positions next turn. We both benefit more from targeting Turkey than fighting each other.
To [RUS]: I appreciate our continued non-aggression regarding GAL and RUM. Germany's expansion is indeed concerning - they now control 6 centers including Moscow. I agree we should maintain our current arrangement, with you respecting my Balkan position while I respect your hold on Rumania. I suggest we both focus on containing German expansion while avoiding conflict with each other. Would you consider coordinating defensive positions against potential German moves into Ukraine or Galicia?
To [TUR]: Your demands are unreasonable. I have no intention of abandoning territories I rightfully control. However, I recognize that our conflict only benefits others - Germany is expanding rapidly, and Italy threatens both of us. I propose a pragmatic solution: I'll maintain my current positions without further aggression toward you if you agree to the same. This allows us both to focus on more pressing threats without yielding territory. What specific arrangement would make this acceptable to you?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am concerned about GER's expansion into MOS and UKR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will respect your position in the Balkans if you respect mine in RUM. I am not interested in coordinating against TUR at this time. I am focused on containing GER's expansion.
From [ITA]: Austria, your stubbornness is noted. I propose a compromise: I will support F GRE to AEG, and you support A VEN to TRI. We both gain against Turkey. If you refuse, I will move A VEN to TRI and F ADR to ALB, leaving you vulnerable. Choose wisely.
From [TUR]: AUT, your ceasefire proposal is still unacceptable while you occupy BUL and GRE. I demand you withdraw immediately. I am not concerned about RUS's fleet in RUM, as I have an agreement with them. I am more concerned about your aggression in the Balkans. Withdraw from BUL and GRE, or face the consequences. I am prepared to defend my interests in the Balkans and will not hesitate to use force.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I categorically reject your threats and ultimatums. Trieste is my home center and I will defend it with all available force. A TYR will support A TRI to hold, and I will not yield this territory under any circumstances. Your aggressive stance only pushes us into unnecessary conflict while Turkey remains a threat to both of us. I remain open to cooperation against Turkey, but not at the expense of my home centers.
To [RUS]: I agree to maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Rumania. Germany's expansion to 6 centers including Moscow is indeed concerning. I'll respect your position in Rumania while focusing on containing German expansion. I'm positioning A BUD to support defensive positions and will not threaten your territories. Let's continue our pragmatic arrangement while monitoring Germany's growing power in the region.
To [TUR]: Your continued hostility only benefits our mutual rivals. While I won't abandon my current territories, I'm willing to focus my attention elsewhere if you cease attacks on my positions. Germany now controls 6 centers and grows stronger while we fight. Russia threatens both our positions with their fleet in Rumania. I propose we each maintain our current positions without further aggression toward each other, allowing us to address more pressing threats.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. I am moving A VEN to TRI. Prepare to be invaded. I will take what is rightfully mine.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am concerned about GER's expansion into MOS and UKR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will respect your position in the Balkans if you respect mine in RUM. I am not interested in coordinating against TUR at this time. I am focused on containing GER's expansion.
From [TUR]: AUT, your stubbornness is astounding. I will not accept anything less than your complete withdrawal from BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation of these territories is an act of aggression, and I will respond accordingly. Prepare for war. I will move A BUL to SER, F AEG to GRE, and F BLA will support RUS into BUL.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I retreated A BUL to SER after being dislodged. I also disbanded A GAL during the adjustment phase, while France built F BRE, Germany built F BER, and Turkey built F SMY. Russia disbanded A LVN. Italy threatened to attack Trieste, demanding I support their move to TRI in exchange for support against Turkey - a completely unacceptable proposal. They ultimately threatened invasion. Turkey was hostile, demanding immediate withdrawal from Bulgaria and Greece, threatening coordinated attacks with Russia. Russia was neutral, proposing non-aggression regarding GAL and RUM while focusing on containing Germany's expansion into Moscow. No power was willing to coordinate against the growing German threat.
Intent: I must defend Trieste at all costs against Italian aggression with A TYR supporting A TRI to hold. I'll use A BUD to support A SER against Turkish attacks, while F GRE will hold against Turkish threats. My priority is defending my home centers and current territories while avoiding further losses. Germany's expansion to 6 centers is concerning, but immediate threats from Italy and Turkey must be addressed first.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Your continued aggression against my home center of Trieste is unacceptable. I propose a ceasefire where you withdraw your support for attacking Trieste, and I will not move against Venice. We both face greater threats - Turkey is pressuring me in the Balkans while Germany grows unchecked to 6 centers. A continued conflict between us only benefits these powers.
To [TUR]: The current hostilities between us serve neither of our interests while Germany continues to expand unchecked. I propose a ceasefire where I maintain Greece and you keep Bulgaria. This would allow us both to redirect forces against more pressing threats. Russia appears to be weakening, and we could coordinate to ensure neither Germany nor Italy benefits excessively from their decline.
To [RUS]: I see Germany has taken Moscow and now controls 6 supply centers, making them the largest power. I propose we maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Rumania while coordinating against German expansion. I'm willing to support your F RUM against German units if needed. What are your plans this turn?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I suggest you focus on GER. I am open to discussing future cooperation against GER.
From [ITA]: Austria, our conflict in Trieste has been costly for both of us. I propose a truce. I will support your efforts in the Balkans if you allow me to control Trieste. This will allow us to focus on our other enemies. What do you say?
From [TUR]: AUT, your presence in BUL and GRE is unacceptable. Withdraw your forces immediately. Continued occupation will be met with unrelenting aggression. I suggest you reconsider your position before it is too late.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Your proposal is completely unacceptable. Trieste is my home center and I will never surrender it. I have A TYR supporting A TRI and will maintain this defense. Instead, I propose we both focus on our mutual enemy Turkey - you could move F ADR to ION to pressure Turkey's position while I maintain pressure from Greece. Germany's growth to 6 centers should concern us both, and our conflict only benefits them.
To [TUR]: Your threats are counterproductive. I currently hold Greece and Serbia firmly, with support arrangements in place. Meanwhile, Germany has grown to 6 centers and Italy threatens both of us. I propose a practical arrangement: I maintain Greece, you keep Bulgaria, and we both focus on containing Italy and Germany. This pragmatic approach serves our mutual interests better than continued conflict that only benefits the western powers.
To [RUS]: I agree to maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Rumania. Germany's capture of Moscow is alarming - they now control 6 centers and pose the greatest threat to the game balance. I suggest you maintain F RUM to block any German advance while I keep pressure on Turkey. Would you consider supporting my move from Serbia to Bulgaria to contain Turkey while we both prepare against German expansion?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your proposal is acceptable. I will cease my aggression against Trieste if you cease your aggression against Venice. Let us focus on the greater threats of Turkey and Germany. I propose we coordinate our efforts against Turkey in the Balkans. What specific moves are you planning?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am willing to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. However, I cannot openly support you against GER. I suggest you focus on defending your core territories. Perhaps we can discuss future cooperation once GER's expansion is contained. I am moving A SEV to BUL, supported by F RUM, to contain TUR.
From [TUR]: AUT, your proposal for a ceasefire is rejected. Your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is unacceptable. I will not negotiate while you occupy these territories. Withdraw your forces immediately, or face the consequences. I am not interested in coordinating against RUS or anyone else while you remain an aggressor in the Balkans.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I accept your proposal for mutual non-aggression. I will not attack Venice and will maintain my defensive position in Trieste. For coordinated action against Turkey, I plan to move A SER-BUL supported by F GRE while keeping A TRI and A TYR in defensive positions. Would you consider moving F ADR to ION to pressure Turkey from the west? This would create a pincer movement that could force Turkey to withdraw from the Balkans.
To [RUS]: I understand your position regarding Germany. I'll maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Rumania. I note your plan to move A SEV-BUL supported by F RUM. To avoid conflict, I will not attempt to move into Bulgaria this turn and will focus on defending my current positions. Let's continue to share information about German movements, as their expansion to 6 centers threatens the balance of power for all of us.
To [TUR]: Your continued hostility is shortsighted while Germany grows unchecked to 6 centers. I currently hold Greece and Serbia securely with support arrangements in place. I have no units in Bulgaria, contrary to your message. I will maintain my defensive posture in Greece and Serbia this turn. Consider that our conflict only benefits Germany and Italy, who will gladly pick up the pieces if we continue to weaken each other.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your stubbornness is astounding. I will not abandon Trieste. However, I am willing to focus on Turkey. I propose a coordinated attack: I will move F ADR to ION to pressure Turkey, if you move A GRE to AEG. This will force Turkey to divert resources. Do you agree to this specific plan?
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am increasingly concerned about GER's expansion. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now, but I am open to discussing a more formal alliance against GER if they continue to expand. I am moving A SEV to BUL to contain TUR, but this also serves to create a buffer against GER. Let's discuss coordinating our efforts to contain GER's aggression.
From [TUR]: AUT, your proposal is still unacceptable. I will not allow you to retain GRE. Your continued presence there is a direct threat to my interests. Withdraw your forces from both BUL and GRE, and then we can discuss a potential ceasefire. Until then, I will continue to press my claims.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: I will not abandon Trieste under any circumstances - it's my home center. However, I accept your proposal to coordinate against Turkey. I'll order F GRE to support A SER-BUL this turn while maintaining my defensive position in Trieste with A TYR supporting A TRI. If you move F ADR to ION as proposed, we can create effective pressure on Turkey from multiple directions.
To [RUS]: I share your concerns about Germany's expansion. I'll maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Rumania while you move A SEV-BUL. I'll be ordering A SER-BUL supported by F GRE to pressure Turkey, which should complement your moves. Let's continue sharing intelligence about German movements and discuss more formal coordination against their expansion next turn.
To [TUR]: Your continued hostility is counterproductive while Germany grows to 6 centers. I will maintain my position in Greece and am moving to reclaim Bulgaria this turn with support. Consider that our mutual destruction only benefits Germany and Italy. I remain open to discussing a more practical arrangement in the future that acknowledges the reality of our positions and the greater threats we both face.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I will move F ADR to ION. I expect you to move A GRE to AEG as agreed. Let's cripple Turkey together. I will also move A ROM to NAP and A VEN to APU to prepare for further expansion.
From [TUR]: AUT, your stubbornness is astounding. I will continue to press my claims on BUL and GRE. Prepare for unrelenting aggression. I will move A BUL to RUM supported by A SER, and F AEG to BLA. Your time in GRE is limited.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am increasingly concerned about GER's expansion. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am moving A SEV to BUL to contain TUR, but this also serves to create a buffer against GER. Let's discuss coordinating our efforts to contain GER's aggression. I will not attack you.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, Italy attempted to take Trieste but I successfully defended it. Turkey tried to move into Serbia and Greece but failed. Russia attempted to move into Bulgaria and Romania. Germany continued expanding by taking St. Petersburg, now controlling 6 centers, making them the largest power. Italy initially demanded Trieste but eventually agreed to coordinate against Turkey if I attack the Aegean. Russia proposed non-aggression in Galicia and Romania while they move to Bulgaria to contain Turkey. Turkey was hostile throughout, demanding withdrawal from Greece and threatening aggression. All powers seem concerned about Germany's expansion to 6 centers.
Intent: I will defend Trieste with A TYR supporting A TRI. I'll order F GRE to support A SER-BUL to pressure Turkey, though this contradicts what I suggested to Italy (moving to AEG). I'm maintaining non-aggression with Russia while coordinating against Turkey. I've deliberately misled Italy about my exact moves to protect my position in Greece while appearing cooperative. My moves: A TYR S A TRI, A TRI H, F GRE S A SER-BUL, A BUD S A SER, A SER-BUL.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA-', 'AUT-RUS+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Italy, I propose we coordinate against Turkey as discussed. I'll move F GRE-ION to support your position in the Adriatic while attacking Turkey's position in the Aegean with my army from Bulgaria. In exchange, I need your guarantee not to attack Trieste or Venice-Tyrolia. This arrangement benefits us both - you secure the Adriatic and I can pressure Turkey from multiple fronts. What specific moves can you commit to this turn?
To [RUS]: Russia, I see Germany's expansion to 6 centers as a growing threat to us both. I propose we maintain our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Romania while I focus on containing Turkey in the Balkans. My army in Bulgaria will hold with support from Greece, securing our shared border region. I'm concerned about Germany's moves toward Moscow - would you consider coordinating against their expansion in future turns? What are your plans this season?
To [GER]: Germany, congratulations on your successful expansion. I notice you've become the dominant power with 6 centers, including Norway and Warsaw. I propose a non-aggression pact between us - I have no designs on your territories and hope you'll respect mine. My focus remains in the Balkans against Turkey. What are your strategic priorities moving forward? Perhaps we could find mutual interests against common threats.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I apologize for the aggressive move into Trieste. It was a miscalculation on my part. I propose we coordinate against Turkey. I will support your fleet in Greece if you allow me to occupy Trieste. Let's focus on dismantling Turkey together.
From [TUR]: AUT, I am willing to discuss a ceasefire, but only if you withdraw from BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation of these territories is unacceptable. I am prepared to continue the conflict until my demands are met. What are your terms for a peaceful resolution?
From [RUS]: AUT, I am concerned about GER's aggression. They have taken MOS, which threatens both of us. I propose we discuss a potential alliance to contain GER's expansion. I am willing to guarantee your security in GAL and RUM if you are willing to work with me against GER. What are your thoughts?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Italy, I cannot allow you to occupy Trieste - it's my home center and vital to my survival. However, I'm willing to coordinate against Turkey with you. I'll move F GRE-ION to support your position in the Adriatic while attacking Constantinople with my army from Bulgaria. In exchange, I need your guarantee not to attack Trieste or Venice-Tyrolia. I can also support your move into the Aegean next turn if we coordinate properly.
To [RUS]: Russia, I agree that Germany's expansion is concerning. I'm willing to work with you against Germany while maintaining our non-aggression regarding Galicia and Romania. I'll move A VIE-GAL this turn to strengthen our position against German expansion. My army in Bulgaria will move to Constantinople to pressure Turkey, which should prevent them from interfering with our plans. What specific moves are you planning this turn that I could potentially support?
To [TUR]: Turkey, I cannot withdraw from Bulgaria and Greece as they are essential to my position. However, I'm willing to discuss a more limited arrangement: I won't attack your home centers (Smyrna, Constantinople, Ankara) if you cease attacks on my current territories. My focus is shifting toward containing Germany's expansion, which threatens us all. Would you consider a temporary ceasefire on these terms while we address the German threat?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your offer is unacceptable. I will not agree to a ceasefire unless you withdraw from both BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation of these territories is a direct threat to my interests in the Balkans. I am prepared to continue the conflict until my demands are met. I suggest you reconsider your position.
From [RUS]: AUT, I am concerned about GER's aggression. They have taken MOS, which threatens both of us. I propose we discuss a potential alliance to contain GER's expansion. I am willing to guarantee your security in GAL and RUM if you are willing to work with me against GER. What are your thoughts? I am willing to support your efforts in the Balkans if you are willing to work with me against GER.
From [ITA]: Austria, I accept your proposal. I will support your fleet in Greece by moving F ADR to ION. I guarantee not to attack Trieste or Venice-Tyrolia. Let's coordinate our attacks on Turkey this turn. I will also move A NAP to APU and A VEN holds.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Italy, I appreciate your cooperation. I'll move F GRE-ION this turn while A BUL-CON to pressure Turkey from multiple fronts. I'll also keep A TRI and A TYR in defensive positions as agreed. This coordinated approach should weaken Turkey's position significantly. Next turn, we can discuss further operations against Turkish centers if this goes well. Let's execute this plan and reassess afterward.
To [RUS]: Russia, I agree to work together against Germany's expansion. I'll move A VIE-GAL this turn to strengthen our position against German forces, while A BUL-CON to pressure Turkey. This should prevent Turkish interference with our plans against Germany. I'm willing to support your moves against German positions next turn if you can guarantee non-aggression in RUM. What specific German territories should we target first in our coordinated effort?
To [GER]: Germany, your expansion is impressive but concerning to many powers. I propose we avoid conflict by establishing clear spheres of influence. I have no designs on your current territories and am focused on the Balkans and containing Turkey. In return, I ask that you respect my current holdings and avoid moves toward Vienna or Budapest. This arrangement would allow us both to focus on other fronts. What are your thoughts on this proposal?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I am concerned about your insistence on Trieste. I thought we had an agreement. I am moving F ADR to ION as promised. I need assurances that you will focus on Turkey and not turn against me. What are your specific moves this turn?
From [RUS]: AUT, I am pleased to hear you are willing to work with me against GER. I propose we coordinate our moves to contain GER's expansion. I am willing to support your efforts in the Balkans if you are willing to work with me against GER. I will move A MOS to WAR to pressure GER. What specific moves are you planning this turn that I could potentially support?
From [TUR]: AUT, your offer is still unacceptable. I will not agree to a ceasefire unless you withdraw from both BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation of these territories is a direct threat to my interests in the Balkans. I am prepared to continue the conflict until my demands are met. I am not concerned about GER at the moment. My focus is on the Balkans.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Italy, I confirm my moves this turn: F GRE-ION to coordinate with your fleet, A BUL-CON to pressure Turkey, while A TRI and A TYR remain in defensive positions as agreed. I have no designs on your territories and am fully committed to our joint operation against Turkey. This coordinated approach should significantly weaken Turkey's position and allow us both to make gains in future turns.
To [RUS]: Russia, I'll move A VIE-GAL this turn to strengthen our position against German forces while A BUL-CON to pressure Turkey. I believe we should target Warsaw first in our coordinated effort against Germany, as reclaiming this territory would significantly weaken their position. I'm committed to our non-aggression regarding Rumania while we focus on the German threat. Let's coordinate specific support moves next turn once we see how this turn unfolds.
To [GER]: Germany, as the dominant power with 6 centers, your continued expansion threatens the balance of power. I propose a non-aggression pact between us - I have no designs on your territories if you respect mine. My focus remains in the Balkans against Turkey, but I'm concerned about your moves toward Vienna. Can we establish clear spheres of influence to avoid unnecessary conflict while you focus on other fronts?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving F ADR to ION as agreed. I expect you to move F GRE to ION and A BUL to CON. Let's crush Turkey together. I will hold my other units in place for now.
From [RUS]: AUT, I am moving A MOS to WAR to pressure GER. I am pleased to hear you are willing to work with me against GER. I am willing to support your efforts in the Balkans if you are willing to work with me against GER. What specific German territories should we target first in our coordinated effort?
From [TUR]: AUT, I have nothing further to say. Your offer is rejected. Prepare for war.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my position with 6 centers and 6 units. France built in Brest and Germany in Berlin, while Turkey disbanded a unit in Constantinople after being forced to retreat from Bulgaria. Italy proposed coordination against Turkey but wanted Trieste, which I firmly rejected while still agreeing to coordinate against Turkey. Russia is concerned about German expansion and proposed an alliance against Germany, which I accepted. Turkey demanded withdrawal from Bulgaria and Greece as a condition for peace, which I rejected as unreasonable. Italy eventually agreed to move F ADR-ION while I promised F GRE-ION and A BUL-CON.
Intent: I'll execute the coordinated attack on Turkey with Italy by moving F GRE-ION and A BUL-CON. I'll also move A VIE-GAL to begin positioning against Germany in coordination with Russia. A TRI and A TYR will hold defensively to protect against any Italian treachery. A BUD will hold to secure my home center. This balances my commitments to Russia against Germany while maintaining pressure on Turkey with Italian support.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA~', 'AUT-RUS++']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, our alliance against Germany should begin in earnest. I'm moving A GAL to support your A WAR while positioning A BUD to attack RUM with your support. Meanwhile, I've successfully taken Constantinople and will press further into Turkey. Can you support A BUD-RUM this turn? This would significantly strengthen our eastern flank against both Turkey and Germany.
To [ITA]: Italy, I've kept my word and moved to ION as promised. I've also taken Constantinople from Turkey as we discussed. I propose we continue our coordination against Turkey - I'll use F ION to support your moves in the Mediterranean if you'll avoid any moves against my territories. What are your plans this turn? I suggest you move A VEN-TRI with my support from TYR to strengthen our mutual position against Germany.
To [TUR]: Turkey, the situation has changed dramatically with my forces now in Constantinople. I propose a ceasefire where you keep Smyrna and Ankara while I retain Bulgaria, Greece and Constantinople. This arrangement would allow you to focus on defending against potential threats from Russia and Italy rather than continuing a costly war with me. What say you to this reasonable proposal?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, neighbor. I propose maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am concerned about GER's expansionist tendencies and believe we should explore a potential alliance to contain them. What are your thoughts on this matter?
From [TUR]: AUT, I reiterate my demand for your withdrawal from BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation of these territories is unacceptable. I will not cease my attacks until you comply. I am willing to discuss terms for a peaceful resolution only after you have withdrawn.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving F ADR to TRI to support you against Turkey. I will also move A APU to NAP to defend against France. Let's coordinate our attacks on Turkey this turn.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I agree we must contain Germany's expansion. I'll support your position in Warsaw with A GAL while preparing to move on Rumania with A BUD. Can you support A BUD-RUM this turn? I've successfully taken Constantinople from Turkey and am pressing my advantage there. Our combined strength against Germany and Turkey will be formidable if we coordinate effectively.
To [ITA]: There seems to be confusion - I cannot support you moving F ADR-TRI as Trieste is my home center and currently occupied by my army. Instead, I propose you move F ADR-ALB to threaten Turkey's position while I use F ION to support your operations. I'm planning to move A TYR to support A TRI against any potential threats, and will use my position in Constantinople to further pressure Turkey.
To [TUR]: Your demands are unreasonable now that I control Constantinople. I offer a final chance for peace: I keep Constantinople, Bulgaria and Greece, while you retain Smyrna and Ankara. We can establish a demilitarized zone in the Aegean. This is generous considering my current position. Refuse, and I'll be forced to press further into your territory with Italian and Russian support.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your proposal is insulting. I will never accept your occupation of Constantinople. I demand your unconditional withdrawal from BUL, GRE, and CON. I will continue to attack your holdings until you comply. There will be no ceasefire until you withdraw.
From [RUS]: Russia is ready to move against Germany. I will support A WAR to GAL. I cannot support A BUD to RUM this turn, as I need to secure BUL. However, I am open to coordinating our efforts against GER in the future. Let's discuss a long-term strategy to contain GER's expansion.
From [ITA]: Austria, excellent work on taking Constantinople! I will support your fleet in the Ionian. However, I cannot move A VEN to TRI as Germany is a greater threat. I will move A APU to NAP to defend against France. I suggest we focus on securing the Balkans and containing Germany. What are your thoughts on a coordinated attack on Smyrna next turn?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your focus on Bulgaria, though I'm disappointed you can't support my move to Rumania. I'll still support your position with A GAL while maintaining pressure on Turkey from Constantinople. I'm planning to move A TYR to support A TRI defensively while using F ION to threaten Turkey's Mediterranean position. Let's continue coordinating against Germany - their expansion is indeed concerning and requires our joint attention.
To [ITA]: Thank you for your support in the Ionian. I'll use F ION to threaten Turkey's position while maintaining A TRI and supporting it with A TYR. A coordinated attack on Smyrna next turn is an excellent suggestion - I could move F ION-AEG this turn to set up that attack. However, I'm concerned about your mention of moving F ADR-TRI earlier - please confirm you won't be moving against my home center, as this would force me to redirect forces away from our Turkish campaign.
To [TUR]: Your stubbornness is unfortunate. With my army in Constantinople, fleet in the Ionian, and control of Bulgaria and Greece, your position is increasingly untenable. I now have coordination with both Italy and Russia, who share my interest in containing your power. This is your final opportunity for a reasonable settlement before I press further into Ankara and Smyrna with allied support. The diplomatic landscape has shifted - consider your position carefully.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your desperation is amusing. I will never accept your occupation of CON, BUL, or GRE. I will continue to attack your holdings until you are driven out of the Balkans. There will be no ceasefire until you unconditionally surrender. Prepare for your demise.
From [ITA]: Austria, my apologies for the confusion. I will move F ADR to ALB as you suggest. I will also move A APU to NAP to defend against France. Let's coordinate our attacks on Turkey this turn. I will support your fleet in the Ionian.
From [RUS]: I will support A WAR to GAL. I cannot support A BUD to RUM this turn, as I need to secure BUL. However, I am open to coordinating our efforts against GER in the future. Let's discuss a long-term strategy to contain GER's expansion. I am concerned about GER's move into MOS.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I'll support your position against Germany with A GAL while maintaining pressure on Turkey from Constantinople. I'm moving F ION-GRE to secure my position there, A CON-ANK to press further into Turkey, and will use A TYR to support A TRI defensively. Let's continue our alliance against Germany - I'm committed to containing their expansion and will coordinate with you on future moves against them.
To [ITA]: Thank you for clarifying about F ADR-ALB. I'll be moving F ION-GRE to secure my position there while pressing into Turkey with A CON-ANK. I'll maintain A TRI with support from A TYR to secure our mutual border. Next turn, we can coordinate an attack on Smyrna as you suggested, potentially with my fleet moving to AEG. Let's continue our successful coordination against Turkey while remaining vigilant about Germany's expansion.
To [TUR]: With my army now moving from Constantinople to Ankara, I control the diplomatic and military initiative. My alliance with Russia and coordination with Italy means your position will only deteriorate further. I offer one final reasonable settlement: you retain Smyrna while I keep my current holdings. This allows you to preserve your remaining power rather than face complete elimination. The choice is yours - pragmatic acceptance or continued decline.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your threats are meaningless. I will never surrender. Prepare to be crushed.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving F ADR to TRI to support you against Turkey. I will also move A APU to NAP to defend against France. Let's coordinate our attacks on Turkey this turn. I will support your fleet in the Ionian.
From [RUS]: I will support A WAR to GAL. I cannot support A BUD to RUM this turn, as I need to secure BUL. However, I am open to coordinating our efforts against GER in the future. Let's discuss a long-term strategy to contain GER's expansion. I am concerned about GER's move into MOS.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully captured Constantinople from Turkey with A BUL-CON while moving F GRE-ION to strengthen my Mediterranean position. I also repositioned A VIE-GAL to prepare for potential operations against Russia or Germany. My armies in TRI, TYR, and BUD held their positions, maintaining my defensive line. Meanwhile, England moved into Holland and Kiel, France repositioned in the Mediterranean, Germany took Paris and St. Petersburg, and Russia moved to Ukraine and Warsaw. Russia proposed an alliance against Germany but refused to support my move to Rumania, claiming they need to secure Bulgaria instead. Italy initially caused confusion by suggesting they would move F ADR-TRI (my home center) but later clarified they meant F ADR-ALB. They proposed coordinating against Turkey with a future attack on Smyrna. Turkey remained belligerent, demanding I withdraw from Constantinople, Bulgaria, and Greece - an unreasonable position given my current military advantage.
Intent: I will support Russia against Germany with A GAL while pressing my advantage against Turkey. My planned moves are: A CON-ANK to further penetrate Turkish territory, F ION-AEG to threaten Smyrna, A TYR S A TRI to secure my home center, A BUD H to maintain my defensive position, and A GAL S A WAR to help Russia against Germany. I'm wary of Italy's mixed messages about Trieste and will watch their moves carefully while maintaining our coordination against Turkey.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA+', 'AUT-RUS+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I'm continuing our alliance against Germany. I'll support your A WAR with my A GAL this turn. In return, I'd like your support for my move into Rumania next turn - this would secure our eastern flank against Turkey while allowing us to focus on the German threat. What are your plans for Ukraine and Moscow this turn?
To [ITA]: Italy, I'm moving A ANK-SMY and F ION-ADR this turn to continue our pressure on Turkey. I'll also support your A VEN with my A TYR if you wish to move elsewhere. In return, I need your F ADR to support my F ION-ADR to ensure success. This coordinated approach will eliminate Turkey quickly and secure the Mediterranean for both of us.
To [GER]: Germany, your rapid expansion is impressive but concerning. I propose a non-aggression pact between us - I'll stay out of Munich and Berlin if you agree to respect my northern borders. We both have more to gain focusing elsewhere - you against England/France and me in the Mediterranean. What are your thoughts on such an arrangement?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, neighbor. I propose A WAR - GAL. This will maintain the status quo in Galicia. What are your thoughts? I am concerned about GER's expansion.
From [TUR]: AUT, I reiterate my demand for your unconditional withdrawal from BUL and GRE. Until you comply, all negotiations are off the table. Prepare for further incursions into your territory.
From [ITA]: To Austria, I propose a temporary truce. While our recent actions have caused friction, a continued conflict benefits neither of us. I suggest we focus our efforts on containing Turkey's expansion in the Balkans. I am willing to discuss terms for a non-aggression pact. What say you?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I agree to maintain the status quo in Galicia - I'll support your A WAR with my A GAL this turn. Germany's expansion is indeed concerning. I'm moving against Turkey with A ANK-SMY and F ION-ADR to eliminate that threat. After Turkey falls, we should coordinate a joint offensive against Germany. Would you consider supporting my move into Rumania next turn? This would secure our eastern flank while we focus on the German threat.
To [ITA]: I accept your proposal for a truce and coordination against Turkey. I'm moving A ANK-SMY and F ION-ADR this turn to pressure Turkey from multiple directions. I'll also keep A TYR and A TRI in defensive positions to maintain our border stability. If you move your F ADR to support my F ION-ADR, we can ensure success against Turkish naval forces. This coordinated approach will eliminate Turkey quickly and secure the Mediterranean for both of us.
To [GER]: Germany, your rapid expansion is concerning to many powers. I propose a non-aggression pact between us - I'll stay out of Munich and Berlin if you agree to respect my northern borders. We both have more to gain focusing elsewhere - you against England/France and me in the Mediterranean. This arrangement would prevent unnecessary conflict while we pursue our respective objectives. What are your thoughts?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of BUL and GRE is unacceptable. I will not negotiate until you withdraw. Prepare for further attacks.
From [RUS]: Greetings, neighbor. I appreciate your support for A WAR. However, I cannot support your move into RUM next turn. I am concerned about GER's expansion, but I must prioritize my alliance with TUR. I will move A WAR to GAL to maintain the status quo.
From [ITA]: AUT, I appreciate your offer of support for A VEN. However, I must decline. I am focusing my efforts elsewhere. I am also unable to support your F ION to ADR. I am moving F ADR to ALB to secure a position in the Balkans. I suggest you focus on Turkey without my assistance for now.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your position regarding Rumania. I'll still support your A WAR with my A GAL this turn against Germany. I'm moving A ANK-SMY and F ION-ADR to eliminate Turkey quickly. Once that threat is neutralized, we can focus fully on containing Germany's expansion. I suggest we coordinate a joint offensive against German positions in the north after Turkey falls.
To [ITA]: I understand your current priorities. I'll proceed with A ANK-SMY and attempt F ION-ADR while keeping A TYR and A TRI in defensive positions to maintain our border stability. Your move to Albania makes sense strategically. Once Turkey is eliminated, we can discuss a more coordinated Mediterranean strategy that benefits us both. In the meantime, I trust we'll maintain our non-aggression understanding.
To [GER]: Germany, your expansion is impressive but has created concern among multiple powers. I propose we establish a clear understanding: I'll focus on eliminating Turkey and securing the Mediterranean while you pursue your objectives elsewhere. A non-aggression pact between us would prevent unnecessary conflict and allow us both to strengthen our positions against more immediate threats. What are your thoughts?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: AUT, I am unable to support your F ION to ADR. I am moving F ADR to ALB to secure a position in the Balkans. I suggest you focus on Turkey without my assistance for now. I will maintain a defensive posture in Trieste.
From [RUS]: Greetings, neighbor. I appreciate your support for A WAR. However, I cannot support your move into RUM. I am committed to my alliance with TUR. I will move A WAR to GAL to maintain the status quo. I am concerned about GER's expansion.
From [TUR]: AUT, your stubbornness will be your downfall. Withdraw from BUL and GRE, or face the consequences. I will not negotiate until you comply.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I'll support your A WAR with my A GAL as promised to contain Germany's expansion. I'm executing my final assault on Turkey with A ANK-SMY and attempting to move into the Adriatic. Once Turkey is eliminated, we should coordinate a joint offensive against Germany's northern positions. Your alliance with Turkey is puzzling given their weakness, but I respect your position and will continue our cooperation against the greater German threat.
To [ITA]: I understand your current priorities and will proceed with A ANK-SMY while maintaining defensive positions with A TYR and A TRI to ensure our border stability. I'll attempt to move F ION-ADR independently. Your move to Albania is strategically sound. Let's maintain our non-aggression understanding while I finish eliminating Turkey, after which we can coordinate a more comprehensive Mediterranean strategy that benefits us both.
To [GER]: Your impressive expansion has created concern among multiple powers. I propose a clear understanding: I'll focus on eliminating Turkey and securing the Mediterranean while you pursue objectives elsewhere. A non-aggression pact between us would prevent unnecessary conflict and allow us both to strengthen against more immediate threats. I have no designs on your territory and hope you'll reciprocate this sentiment.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings, neighbor. I appreciate your support for A WAR. However, I cannot support your move into RUM. I am committed to my alliance with TUR. I will move A WAR to GAL to maintain the status quo. I am concerned about GER's expansion. Perhaps we can work together in the future.
From [TUR]: AUT, this is your final warning. Withdraw from BUL and GRE, or face total annihilation. Your time is running out.
From [ITA]: AUT, I am moving F ADR to ALB. I will not support your move into ADR. I suggest you focus on defending your territories. Our truce is over.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully captured Ankara with my army from Constantinople while attempting to move into the Aegean. I maintained defensive positions in Tyrolia, Trieste, Galicia, and Budapest. Russia moved into Warsaw and Sevastopol, while Italy attempted to move into Venice and the Ionian. Turkey tried to move into the Aegean. I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my position. Russia offered to maintain the status quo in Galicia but rejected my proposal to support a move into Rumania, citing their alliance with Turkey. Italy initially proposed a truce but later declared it over, planning to move F ADR to ALB without supporting my moves. Turkey demanded withdrawal from Bulgaria and Greece with threats of attacks. Germany did not respond to my non-aggression pact proposal.
Intent: I'll execute my assault on Turkey with A ANK-SMY while attempting F ION-ADR. I'll support Russia's A WAR with my A GAL to maintain that relationship despite their Turkish alliance. I'll keep A TYR and A TRI in defensive positions to guard against potential Italian aggression. My goal is to eliminate Turkey quickly, then pivot to address the German threat in coordination with Russia if possible. I'll maintain defensive positions against Italy while seeking to improve relations.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA-']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I see we both face pressure from Germany's expansion. I propose we coordinate against them - I'll order A BOH-MUN and A GAL support A BUD-RUM. In exchange, I ask you to support my move into Rumania with F SEV. This gives us both strategic advantages - I can pressure Germany while you can focus on defending Moscow. Let me know if this arrangement works for you.
To [ITA]: Italy, I'm planning a decisive move against Venice with A TYR-VEN supported by F ADR and A TRI. However, I'd prefer cooperation over conflict. If you agree to move A VEN-APU and A APU-NAP, I'll redirect my forces to support you against Turkey instead. We could coordinate an attack on the Ionian Sea to pressure Turkey's remaining positions. What do you say to this arrangement?
To [GER]: Germany, your expansion is impressive but has created concern among other powers. I propose a non-aggression pact between us - I'll not move against Munich if you agree not to threaten my territories. This would allow us both to focus on other fronts where we have greater interests. Are you amenable to such an arrangement?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings. I am concerned about the escalating tensions in the Balkans. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM to avoid further conflict. What are your intentions this turn?
From [ITA]: Austria, I regret that our alliance has broken down. However, I believe that we can still find a way to coexist peacefully. I propose a non-aggression pact. What do you say?
From [TUR]: AUT, withdraw from BUL and GRE. Your continued occupation is unacceptable. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans until you comply. Surrender now and avoid further bloodshed.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your concerns about the Balkans. I'm planning to move A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany, which benefits us both. Regarding RUM, I need to secure it to counter German expansion - I'll move A BUD-RUM with A GAL support. If you support this with F SEV, we can effectively contain Germany while maintaining our cooperation. I have no designs on your other territories and see our alliance as crucial against the German threat.
To [ITA]: I appreciate your proposal for non-aggression. To demonstrate my commitment, I'll redirect my forces away from Venice if you agree to move your units southward. Specifically, I propose you move A VEN-APU and A APU-NAP while I focus on pressuring Turkey's remaining positions. We could coordinate against Turkey's fleet in ION next turn. This arrangement would benefit us both - you secure your home centers while I eliminate a mutual threat.
To [GER]: Your expansion has been impressive, but it's created a precarious balance of power. I'm moving A BOH-MUN this turn, but I'm open to discussing a future non-aggression pact that would benefit us both. If you're willing to guarantee the security of my northern territories, I could redirect my forces elsewhere. What terms would you find acceptable for such an arrangement?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your time is running out. Withdraw from BUL and GRE immediately. Your resistance is futile. Surrender now and avoid further bloodshed. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans until you comply.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am willing to reconsider our conflict. If you are willing to cede Trieste to me, I will support your efforts against Turkey. I will move A VEN to APU and A APU to NAP as you requested, if you agree to cede Trieste. This will allow us to focus on our common enemy, Turkey.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your concern about GER's expansion. However, I cannot support your move into RUM with F SEV, as it conflicts with my alliance with TUR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am open to discussing future cooperation against GER, but only if it does not compromise my existing alliances.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your alliance with Turkey constrains your options. I'll proceed with A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany independently, which still serves our mutual interest in containing German expansion. Regarding Galicia, I'll maintain our status quo agreement. While I must secure my position against Turkey, I value our cooperation and will avoid actions that directly threaten your territories. Let's continue discussing how to address the German threat without compromising your existing alliances.
To [ITA]: I cannot cede Trieste as it's one of my home centers, but I'm willing to redirect my forces away from Venice as a gesture of goodwill. I'll order A TYR-VEN with support from F ADR and A TRI to secure my position, but I propose we establish a demilitarized zone afterward. If you move your units southward as suggested, we can negotiate a more permanent arrangement next turn that respects both our territorial interests while focusing on Turkey. Consider this a necessary defensive move rather than aggression.
To [TUR]: Your demands are unreasonable given the current military situation. I now control Ankara and Smyrna, and your position is untenable. Instead of empty threats, I propose a realistic arrangement: I'll allow you to maintain Constantinople if you cease all hostilities against my territories. This is the only offer you'll receive - continued resistance will result in your complete elimination. Consider your response carefully, as this may be your last opportunity for survival.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your situation is becoming increasingly dire. Withdraw from BUL and GRE immediately. Your resistance is futile. Surrender now and avoid further bloodshed. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans until you comply.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am willing to reconsider our conflict. If you are willing to cede Trieste to me, I will support your efforts against Turkey. I will move A VEN to APU and A APU to NAP as you requested, if you agree to cede Trieste. This will allow us to focus on our common enemy, Turkey. I will also support your move into the Ionian Sea.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer of cooperation against GER. However, I cannot support your move into RUM, as it would betray my alliance with TUR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am open to discussing future cooperation against GER, but only if it does not compromise my existing alliances. I will move A WAR to GAL.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your position regarding Rumania and will respect our status quo in Galicia. I'm proceeding with A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany independently, which serves our mutual interest in containing their expansion. I'll support your A WAR if needed against German aggression. Let's continue our cooperation against the German threat while respecting your existing alliances.
To [ITA]: I cannot cede Trieste as it's my home center, but I must secure my position. I'll be moving A TYR-VEN with support from F ADR and A TRI this turn. However, I'm still open to establishing a more stable arrangement afterward if you redirect your forces southward. We both benefit more from focusing on Turkey than fighting each other. Consider this a defensive necessity rather than permanent aggression.
To [GER]: Your expansion has created significant concern among multiple powers. I'm moving A BOH-MUN this turn as a necessary response to the shifting balance of power. However, I remain open to discussing a future non-aggression pact if you're willing to guarantee the security of my northern territories. Such an arrangement would allow us both to focus our resources more efficiently elsewhere.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings. I am moving A WAR to GAL. I cannot support your move into RUM, as it would betray my alliance with TUR. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am open to discussing future cooperation against GER, but only if it does not compromise my existing alliances.
From [TUR]: AUT, your offer is rejected. I will not surrender Constantinople. Withdraw from BUL and GRE immediately. Your resistance is futile. Surrender now and avoid further bloodshed. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans until you comply.
From [ITA]: Austria, I cannot cede Trieste as it's one of my home centers, but I'm willing to redirect my forces away from Venice as a gesture of goodwill. I'll order A TYR-VEN with support from F ADR and A TRI to secure my position, but I propose we establish a demilitarized zone afterward. If you move your units southward as suggested, we can negotiate a more permanent arrangement next turn that respects both our territorial interests while focusing on Turkey. Consider this a necessary defensive move rather than aggression.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully moved into Smyrna from Ankara, securing another Turkish center. I also moved my fleet from Ionian Sea to Adriatic, repositioned from Vienna to Bohemia, and maintained positions in Trieste, Galicia, and Budapest. Germany was forced to retreat from Burgundy to Munich after French pressure. Russia wants to maintain status quo in Galicia and Rumania, citing alliance with Turkey, but plans to move Warsaw to Galicia. Italy proposed a non-aggression pact but demanded Trieste, which I refused. Turkey continues making unrealistic demands for withdrawal from Bulgaria and Greece despite their weak position. No meaningful negotiations with Germany, England, or France occurred.
Intent: I'll attack Venice with A TYR-VEN supported by F ADR and A TRI to secure my northern flank against Italy. I'll also attempt A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany. For Turkey, I'll use F ADR to support an attack on the Ionian Sea while maintaining my position in Smyrna. I'll keep A GAL in place to maintain the status quo with Russia as agreed. A BUD will hold to protect against any Russian moves toward Rumania.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I propose we coordinate against our mutual threats. I'll support your position in Rumania with A GAL S A RUM while attacking Turkey's last stronghold with A CON-SMY. In return, I ask you not to move against my territories. Germany's expansion is concerning - I'm positioning A BOH-SIL to help contain them. What are your plans this turn?
To [ITA]: Italy, our conflict benefits neither of us while Germany grows stronger. I propose a mutual non-aggression pact: I won't attack your territories if you respect mine. I'm willing to support your F GRE-ION with my F ADR if you're interested in pressuring Turkey's remaining position. Let me know your thoughts on this arrangement.
To [GER]: Germany, your rapid expansion has put you in a strong position. I propose a non-aggression pact between us to avoid unnecessary conflict. I have no designs on your territories and hope you'll extend the same courtesy to mine. What are your plans for this turn, and would you be open to coordinating our movements to avoid conflict?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, I demand you withdraw from SMY. Your continued presence there is unacceptable. I will continue to pressure you in the Balkans.
From [ITA]: Austria, I regret our current conflict. Perhaps we can find a way to cooperate again in the future. I am open to discussing a demilitarized zone after your move, as previously discussed.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I will not move against you if you do not move against me. I am willing to discuss a future alliance against GER if they continue to expand in the Baltic. Let me know your thoughts.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I appreciate your proposal and agree to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I'll support your position against German expansion by moving A BOH-SIL to pressure their flank. My A GAL will hold to respect our agreement. I'm also planning to eliminate Turkey's last stronghold with A CON-SMY. Would you consider supporting my A BUD-RUM in a future turn once Turkey is eliminated? This would help us both contain Germany more effectively.
To [ITA]: I'm glad to hear you're open to improving relations. I propose we start with a concrete step: I'll order F ADR-ALB to move away from your territory as a gesture of goodwill, while you agree not to attack TRI or VEN. I'm focusing on eliminating Turkey with A CON-SMY and would welcome your cooperation in the eastern Mediterranean afterward. A demilitarized zone could work well once we've established basic trust. What specific moves are you planning this turn?
To [TUR]: Your demand is unrealistic given the current military situation. I control Constantinople, Bulgaria, and Greece, and am positioned to take Smyrna. Instead of continuing a futile conflict, I propose you focus on rebuilding elsewhere while I secure my position in the east. I have no interest in eliminating you completely if you're willing to cooperate with my strategic objectives in the region.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your presence in SMY is a direct threat. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your continued aggression in the Balkans. Prepare for further attacks.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer to coordinate against our mutual threats. However, I am committed to my alliance with TUR and cannot move against them at this time. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am willing to discuss a future alliance against GER if they continue to expand in the Baltic. I am concerned about their move into STP. What are your thoughts on a coordinated defense of our territories against GER?
From [ITA]: Austria, I am open to a non-aggression pact, but only if you cede Trieste to me. Otherwise, we are at war. I will not support your fleet in the Adriatic. My fleet will move to the Ionian to support Turkey.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I understand your commitment to Turkey, though I'm surprised given their weakness. I'll honor our agreement regarding GAL and RUM while focusing on containing Germany. I'll move A BOH-SIL to pressure their flank and keep A GAL in place. Once Turkey is eliminated, we should coordinate more closely against Germany - their capture of STP is indeed concerning. What specific moves are you planning against German expansion this turn?
To [ITA]: Your demand for Trieste is completely unacceptable - it's my home center and vital to my position. I'm willing to move F ADR-ALB as a gesture of goodwill if you agree not to attack my territories, but I cannot and will not cede Trieste under any circumstances. Supporting Turkey only prolongs a conflict with a dying power while Germany grows stronger. I suggest we find common ground against the real threats rather than fighting each other.
To [GER]: Germany, your expansion to 6 centers makes you the strongest power on the board. I'm concerned about potential conflict as our borders draw closer. I propose we establish clear boundaries to avoid unnecessary confrontation - I have no designs on your territories if you respect mine. I'm particularly interested in your intentions regarding Silesia and Bohemia. Would you be open to coordinating our movements to ensure mutual security?

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer to coordinate against our mutual threats. However, I am committed to my alliance with TUR and cannot move against them at this time. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am willing to discuss a future alliance against GER if they continue to expand in the Baltic. I am concerned about their move into STP. What are your thoughts on a coordinated defense of our territories against GER?
From [ITA]: Austria, I am open to a non-aggression pact, but only if you cede Trieste to me. Otherwise, we are at war. I will not support your fleet in the Adriatic. My fleet will move to the Ionian to support Turkey. I will not agree to a demilitarized zone.
From [TUR]: AUT, your arrogance is astounding. I will never cooperate with you while you occupy Ottoman lands. Your control of CON, BUL, and GRE is temporary. Prepare to be driven out of the Balkans. I will not rest until SMY is back in Turkish hands. Your offer is rejected.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I'll honor our agreement by holding A GAL while moving A BOH-SIL to pressure Germany's flank. My focus remains eliminating Turkey with A CON-SMY and defending against Italian aggression. Once Turkey falls, we should coordinate more closely against Germany's expansion - their control of STP is indeed concerning. I respect your Turkish alliance but hope you'll reconsider once the strategic situation evolves. For now, let's maintain our understanding regarding GAL and RUM while containing German ambitions.
To [ITA]: Your demand for Trieste is completely unacceptable - it's my home center and vital to my position. I will defend it at all costs. I'm moving A VEN-ROM this turn to secure my position while ordering F ADR-ALB as a gesture that I'm willing to de-escalate our conflict. Germany's expansion threatens us both, and our continued fighting only benefits them. I propose we focus on our mutual interests rather than this destructive conflict that weakens us both against the real threats on the board.
To [GER]: Germany, as the strongest power with 6 centers, your intentions are crucial to the board's balance. I'm moving A BOH-SIL this turn to secure my northeastern flank, not as aggression against you. I propose we establish clear boundaries - I have no designs on your territories if you respect mine. My focus remains on securing my position against Turkey and Italy. Would you consider a non-aggression pact to avoid unnecessary conflict as our borders draw closer? Your expansion into STP shows your strength, but we need not become enemies.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your time is running out. Prepare for your demise. I will reclaim SMY and all Ottoman lands. Your arrogance will be your downfall.
From [ITA]: Austria, I am open to a non-aggression pact, but only if you cede Trieste to me. Otherwise, we are at war. I will not support your fleet in the Adriatic. My fleet will move to the Ionian to support Turkey. I will not agree to a demilitarized zone.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer to coordinate against our mutual threats. However, I am committed to my alliance with TUR and cannot move against them at this time. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am willing to discuss a future alliance against GER if they continue to expand in the Baltic. I am concerned about their move into STP. What are your thoughts on a coordinated defense of our territories against GER? This is my final offer for this turn.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: In the previous turn, I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my position with 8 units on the board. France built an army in Brest, while Turkey disbanded their fleet in the Aegean, further weakening their position. I now control 8 supply centers including Constantinople and Ankara, positioning me as one of the dominant powers. Russia proposed maintaining the status quo in Galicia and Rumania, showing interest in future cooperation against Germany but remaining committed to their Turkish alliance. Italy demanded Trieste as a condition for peace, an unacceptable ultimatum that signals continued hostility. Turkey remains belligerent despite their weakened position, making empty threats. I received no response from Germany despite reaching out about their expansion and potential non-aggression.
Intent: I will execute a multi-front strategy: A CON-SMY to eliminate Turkey's last center, A BOH-SIL to pressure Germany's flank, A VEN-ROM to counter Italian aggression, and F ADR-ALB as a strategic repositioning. I'll hold A GAL to honor my agreement with Russia while maintaining defensive positions with A BUD, A TRI, and A VIE to protect my home centers. My primary objectives are eliminating Turkey, containing Italy, and establishing a stronger position against Germany's expansion.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA--', 'AUT-RUS+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I've honored our agreement by holding in Galicia and now I'm moving to counter Germany's expansion with A SIL-WAR. I propose you support this move with your A LVN, allowing us to secure Warsaw against German influence. In return, I'll support your A RUM-BUL next turn, giving you a foothold in the Balkans while I focus on eliminating Turkey and containing Italy. This arrangement benefits us both against the German threat.
To [ITA]: Italy, your demands for Trieste are unacceptable - it's my home center and vital to my security. However, I'm willing to discuss a more balanced arrangement. I propose a DMZ in the Adriatic and mutual non-aggression for three turns, allowing you to focus southward while I address the German threat. My fleet in Albania will not move against your positions if you withdraw your claims on my territory. Consider this carefully - continued hostility benefits neither of us while Germany continues to expand.
To [GER]: Germany, your rapid expansion concerns all powers in the region. I'm proposing a non-aggression pact between us to prevent unnecessary conflict on our border. I have no designs on Munich or Berlin if you have no designs on Vienna or Budapest. We could both benefit from focusing our efforts elsewhere - you northward against England and France, while I address threats in the Mediterranean. Consider this proposal carefully, as mutual restraint would serve both our interests better than conflict.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you have proven to be an unreliable neighbor. I will not forget your aggression. I will be watching you closely.
From [GER]: Austria, I acknowledge your proposal for a non-aggression pact. However, I require assurances of your neutrality in the event of war with FRA and ENG. Furthermore, I expect your support in securing BOH. Provide these assurances, and I will consider your offer.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am concerned about GER's expansionist tendencies. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against them if they continue to encroach on our territories? I am moving A WAR to GAL to defend against any potential GER aggression.
From [TUR]: AUT, your continued occupation of SMY is unacceptable. Withdraw your forces immediately, or face the consequences. I am moving to reclaim what is rightfully mine.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I'm concerned about your plan to move A WAR-GAL as this conflicts with our agreement to maintain the status quo. Instead, I propose you support my A SIL-WAR to secure Warsaw against German expansion. I'm already moving A GAL to support A BUD-RUM to pressure your position, but I'd prefer cooperation. If you support my move to Warsaw, I'll withdraw from Rumania next turn and we can coordinate against Germany. Otherwise, I'll be forced to defend my interests in Galicia and potentially support Germany against you.
To [ITA]: Italy, your hostility is misplaced. I've shown restraint by not attacking your centers despite having the opportunity. I'm currently focused on eliminating Turkey and containing Germany's expansion. I propose a concrete arrangement: if you move F ION to support my F ALB-GRE, I'll guarantee not to attack Rome or Naples for the next three turns. This allows you to secure your position while I address other threats. Continued conflict between us only benefits the larger powers like France and Germany.
To [GER]: Germany, I accept your conditions. I will remain neutral in your conflicts with France and England, and I'm willing to support your position in Bohemia after I've secured my immediate objectives against Turkey and Italy. As a show of good faith, I'm moving A SIL-WAR to create a buffer between our territories rather than threatening your centers directly. I expect reciprocal restraint regarding Vienna and Budapest. Let's formalize this non-aggression pact and focus our efforts on more pressing threats.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your offer of a DMZ is insulting. I will take Trieste by force. Your fleet in Albania is of no concern to me. Prepare for war. I will not rest until Trieste is under Italian control.
From [TUR]: AUT, your time is running out. Withdraw from SMY and the Balkans, or face total annihilation. Your stubbornness will be your downfall.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I appreciate your concern about GER's expansion. However, I cannot support your move of A SIL to WAR at this time. I am focused on securing my position in the Balkans. I am moving A WAR to GAL to defend against any potential GER aggression, but I cannot commit to supporting your move into WAR. I suggest you reconsider your strategy.
From [GER]: Austria, your proposal for a non-aggression pact is noted. However, I require more than mere assurances of neutrality. I demand your support in securing BOH and GAL. Only then will I consider your offer. Otherwise, I will assume you are aligned with my enemies.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I understand your position. However, I'm still moving A SIL-WAR to counter German expansion. If you move to GAL, you'll be threatening my home centers, which I cannot allow. I propose instead that you hold WAR and support my move from SIL, or at minimum don't interfere. Meanwhile, I'll order A GAL to support A BUD-RUM to pressure your position there. We can either cooperate against Germany or find ourselves in conflict - the choice is yours, but cooperation would benefit us both against the German threat.
To [GER]: Germany, I accept your terms. I will support your position in Bohemia and Galicia after securing my immediate objectives. As a demonstration of good faith, I'm ordering A VIE-BUD this turn to create space for future cooperation. I expect reciprocal restraint regarding my home centers. My current focus is eliminating Turkey and containing Italy's aggression against my territories. Once these immediate threats are addressed, I can offer more concrete support for your expansion efforts against France and England.
To [ITA]: Italy, your belligerence is shortsighted. Trieste is my home center and I will defend it with all available forces. I'm ordering F ALB-GRE and A TRI-SER to strengthen my Balkan position while A VEN will move against Rome. You face a choice: continue this futile aggression and lose Rome, or agree to a mutual stand-down that allows both of us to address more pressing threats. Germany and France grow stronger while we waste resources fighting each other. This is your final opportunity for a reasonable settlement.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your stubbornness will be your downfall. Withdraw from SMY and the Balkans, or face total annihilation. Your time is running out. Prepare for the inevitable.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am moving A WAR to GAL to defend against potential GER aggression. I cannot support your move of A SIL to WAR at this time. I am focused on securing my position in the Balkans. I suggest you reconsider your strategy and focus on containing GER's expansionist tendencies. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against them if they continue to encroach on our territories.
From [GER]: Austria, your acceptance is noted. I will consider your offer of a non-aggression pact. However, I still require your support in securing BOH and GAL. I am moving A SIL to WAR. I expect reciprocal restraint regarding Vienna and Budapest. Let us formalize this non-aggression pact and focus our efforts on more pressing threats.
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is rejected. I will take Trieste by force. Your fleet in Albania is of no concern to me. Prepare for war. I will not rest until Trieste is under Italian control. I will not be deterred.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: Russia, I see you're determined to move to Galicia despite our discussions. I'm proceeding with A SIL-WAR and A BUD-RUM supported by A GAL to secure my position. If you insist on threatening my territory, I'll be forced to defend it vigorously. However, I remain open to cooperation against Germany if you reconsider your approach. The German threat grows while we squabble over Galicia - a coordinated strategy would serve us both better.
To [GER]: Germany, we have an agreement. I'll maintain neutrality regarding your conflicts with France and England while focusing on eliminating Turkey and containing Italy. I'm moving A SIL-WAR, A VIE-BUD, and A TRI-SER to strengthen my position without directly threatening your centers. I expect reciprocal restraint regarding Vienna and Budapest. Once I've secured my immediate objectives, I can offer more concrete support for your expansion efforts in the north and west.
To [ITA]: Italy, your belligerence forces my hand. I'm ordering A VEN-ROM, F ALB-GRE, and A TRI-SER to strengthen my position while directly threatening your capital. You can continue this futile aggression and lose Rome, or agree to a mutual stand-down. Germany and France grow stronger while we waste resources fighting each other. This is your final opportunity for a reasonable settlement before I commit fully to eliminating your presence in the Mediterranean.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is rejected. I will take Trieste by force. Your fleet in Albania is of no concern to me. Prepare for war. I will not rest until Trieste is under Italian control. I will not be deterred. I will move A VEN to APU and A ROM to NAP to take Trieste.
From [TUR]: AUT, your stubbornness will be your downfall. Withdraw from SMY and the Balkans, or face total annihilation. Your time is running out. Prepare for the inevitable. I am moving to reclaim what is rightfully mine.
From [GER]: Austria, your acceptance is noted. I will consider your offer of a non-aggression pact. However, I still require your support in securing BOH and GAL. I am moving A SIL to WAR. I expect reciprocal restraint regarding Vienna and Budapest. Let us formalize this non-aggression pact and focus our efforts on more pressing threats. I expect your support.
From [RUS]: Greetings, AUT. I am moving A WAR to GAL to defend against potential GER aggression. I cannot support your move of A SIL to WAR at this time. I am focused on securing my position in the Balkans. I suggest you reconsider your strategy and focus on containing GER's expansionist tendencies. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against them if they continue to encroach on our territories.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn I successfully moved into Smyrna, capturing a Turkish center. I also secured Silesia from Bohemia, held my positions in Trieste, Vienna, Galicia, Budapest, and Venice, and moved my fleet from the Adriatic to Albania. Italy attempted to move into Venice but failed. Russia moved from Warsaw to Livonia and attempted to move from Rumania to Sevastopol. Turkey retreated to Ankara. Negotiations were tense on multiple fronts. Italy is openly hostile, demanding Trieste and rejecting all peace offers. Russia plans to move to Galicia despite my warnings, refusing to support my move into Warsaw. Germany proposed a non-aggression pact but demanded support for Bohemia and Galicia in return. Turkey continues to demand withdrawal from Smyrna and the Balkans with empty threats, despite their weakened position.
Intent: I will move A SIL-WAR to counter German expansion, A GAL S A BUD-RUM to pressure Russia, and defend Trieste against Italian aggression. I'll maintain my position in Smyrna while ignoring Turkey's empty threats. With Germany, I'll maintain the appearance of cooperation while strengthening my position. My specific moves: A SIL-WAR, A GAL S A BUD-RUM, A BUD-RUM, A TRI H, A VIE-BOH, F ALB-GRE, A VEN-ROM, A SMY H.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-RUS-', 'AUT-GER+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: Germany, I propose we formalize our non-aggression pact. I'm willing to withdraw from Warsaw if you'll agree not to move into Bohemia or Silesia. We both face threats from other powers - you from England and France in the west, me from Italy and Russia. A stable eastern front benefits us both while we address these more pressing concerns. What terms would you find acceptable?
To [ITA]: Italy, this hostility between us serves neither of our interests. I have no designs on Rome or Naples, but I will not surrender Trieste under any circumstances - it's my home center. I propose a ceasefire: you don't attack Trieste or Venice, I don't attack Rome or Naples. We could even coordinate against France in the Mediterranean if you're interested. This endless conflict only weakens us both while others grow stronger.
To [RUS]: Russia, I notice you're down to just two centers while Germany continues to expand. I propose we coordinate against German expansion - I can support you in retaking St. Petersburg while you support me in holding Warsaw. Turkey is nearly eliminated and can no longer protect you, while Germany grows stronger each year. Let's work together before it's too late for both of us.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, withdraw from SMY and the Balkans. Your continued presence is unacceptable. I will not tolerate your aggression any longer. Prepare for war.
From [GER]: Austria, I am willing to consider a non-aggression pact. However, I require assurances of your support in securing BOH and GAL. Are you prepared to commit to this? I am moving A SIL to WAR as a gesture of intent.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I am concerned about GER's expansion in the Baltic and their presence in STP. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against GER? What are your thoughts?
From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving my forces to defend against further Turkish aggression. I suggest you do the same. I will be moving A ROM to VEN and A APU to TRI to defend against any Turkish incursion into Trieste. I suggest you focus on defending your own territories.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: I'm willing to withdraw from Warsaw if you'll agree to a mutual non-aggression pact covering Bohemia, Silesia, and Warsaw. However, I cannot support you into Galicia as it would expose my flank to Russia. Instead, I propose we both focus on our respective threats - you against England and France, me against Italy and Turkey's remnants. I'll order A WAR-UKR this turn as a gesture of goodwill if you agree not to move into Bohemia.
To [RUS]: I agree we should coordinate against Germany's expansion. Their control of St. Petersburg threatens both of us. I propose this: I'll support your move to retake St. Petersburg if you'll support my hold in Warsaw against German aggression. Turkey is nearly eliminated and can no longer be a reliable ally for you. Germany now has 5 centers and continues to grow - we must act together before they become unstoppable. What specific moves would you suggest for this turn?
To [ITA]: Your deception is transparent. Moving to Trieste and Venice is clearly an attack on my territories, not a defense against a nearly eliminated Turkey. I will defend my centers vigorously. However, I still believe peace between us is possible. I propose a DMZ in Tyrolia and Venice, with neither of us moving into the other's home centers. This would allow us both to focus on more pressing threats - you against France's Mediterranean expansion, me against Germany's growth in the north.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: AUT, your time is running out. Withdraw from SMY and the Balkans immediately, or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your aggression any longer. Prepare for war. I will reclaim what is rightfully mine.
From [RUS]: Russia understands your concerns about GER. However, I am committed to my current agreements. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am concerned about GER's expansion in the Baltic and their presence in STP. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against GER? What are your thoughts?
From [GER]: Austria, I am willing to formalize a non-aggression pact. However, I require more than just your withdrawal from WAR. I need a guarantee of your support in securing BOH and GAL against any potential RUS aggression. If you can provide this guarantee, I am willing to agree not to move into Bohemia or Silesia. What say you?
From [ITA]: Austria, your proposal is rejected. I will take Trieste. Your threats against Rome are noted, but I am not intimidated. I am moving A ROM to VEN and A APU to TRI. Prepare to defend your territory, as I am coming for Trieste.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: I cannot support you into Galicia or Bohemia as these are critical buffer territories for my security. However, I propose a more limited agreement: I'll withdraw from Warsaw (ordering A WAR-UKR) if you agree not to attack Bohemia this turn. This gives us both breathing room to address our respective threats - you against England/France, me against Italy who has just explicitly threatened to attack Trieste. We can negotiate a more comprehensive agreement next turn once we've secured our immediate positions.
To [RUS]: Germany is demanding I support them into Galicia, which I've refused. They're clearly trying to eliminate you while expanding westward. I propose concrete action: I'll support your F SEV-BLA this turn to pressure Turkey's last unit while maintaining my position in Galicia. In return, I ask that you don't attack my units. Germany now controls 5 centers and is targeting both of us - we must coordinate or be eliminated separately. What specific moves can we agree on to counter German expansion?
To [ITA]: Your intentions are now clear. Be warned that attacking Trieste will only result in mutual destruction while France and Germany grow stronger. I will defend my territories with all available force. My fleet in Greece and army in Smyrna are positioned to strike at your centers should you proceed with this aggression. This is your final chance for a reasonable settlement - a DMZ in Tyrolia and Venice would allow us both to address the growing threats from France and Germany instead of weakening each other.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your proposal is rejected. I will take Trieste. Your threats against Rome are noted, but I am not intimidated. I am moving A ROM to VEN and A APU to TRI. Prepare to defend your territory, as I am coming for Trieste. There will be no DMZ.
From [TUR]: AUT, this is your final warning. Withdraw from SMY and the Balkans immediately, or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your aggression any longer. Prepare for war. I will reclaim what is rightfully mine.
From [GER]: Austria, I am willing to formalize a non-aggression pact. However, I need a guarantee of your support in securing BOH and GAL against any potential RUS aggression. If you can provide this guarantee, I am willing to agree not to move into Bohemia or Silesia. I am not interested in Warsaw. What say you?
From [RUS]: Russia understands your concerns about GER. However, I am committed to my current agreements. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am concerned about GER's expansion in the Baltic and their presence in STP. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against GER? What are your thoughts? I will not support you in WAR.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: I accept a limited non-aggression pact: I won't attack Bohemia or Silesia if you don't attack my territories. I'm ordering A BOH-MUN to counter Italy's threat to Trieste while A WAR supports A GAL-UKR to pressure Russia. This balances our mutual interests while allowing me to defend against Italy's declared attack on my home center. We can negotiate a more comprehensive agreement next turn once I've secured my immediate position against Italy.
To [RUS]: Russia, Germany continues to expand while you're down to just two centers. I'm moving A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany while ordering A GAL-UKR with support from A WAR to demonstrate my commitment to cooperation. I'll maintain my position in Rumanian with A BUD-RUM to secure that border. Germany is clearly the greatest threat to both of us - they now control five centers and are positioned to eliminate you entirely. Let's coordinate against them before it's too late.
To [ITA]: I see you're committed to this destructive path. Very well. I will defend Trieste with all available force while positioning to counter-attack. My armies in Venice and Tyrolia will ensure Trieste remains Austrian, while my fleet moves to threaten your centers. This conflict only serves to weaken us both while France and Germany grow stronger. The responsibility for this pointless war rests entirely with you.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, I am willing to formalize a non-aggression pact. However, I need a guarantee of your support in securing BOH and GAL against any potential RUS aggression. If you can provide this guarantee, I am willing to agree not to move into Bohemia or Silesia. I am not interested in Warsaw. What say you?
From [RUS]: Russia understands your concerns about GER. However, I am committed to my current agreements. I propose we maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am concerned about GER's expansion in the Baltic and their presence in STP. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against GER? What are your thoughts? I will not support you in WAR.
From [ITA]: Austria, your proposal is rejected. I will take Trieste. Your threats against Rome are noted, but I am not intimidated. I am moving A ROM to VEN and A APU to TRI. Prepare to defend your territory, as I am coming for Trieste. There will be no DMZ.
From [TUR]: AUT, your time is up. Prepare for your demise. I will reclaim what is rightfully mine.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I built two armies in Budapest and Vienna, strengthening my position. Russia retreated from Rumania to Ukraine and disbanded armies in Livonia and Ukraine. England built a fleet in Liverpool, while Germany disbanded an army in Silesia and Italy disbanded a fleet in the Aegean. I now control 11 centers with 10 units, making me the strongest power on the board. Italy explicitly threatened to attack Trieste with moves from Rome to Venice and Apulia to Trieste. Germany proposed a non-aggression pact but demanded support into Bohemia and Galicia, which I cannot accept. Russia was evasive but concerned about German expansion. Turkey, despite being nearly eliminated, made empty threats about reclaiming territory. No meaningful agreements were reached with any power.
Intent: My priority is defending Trieste against Italy's declared attack. I'll order A TRI S A VEN, A VEN H to ensure Italy cannot take either center. I'll move A BOH-MUN to pressure Germany while maintaining A GAL to protect against Russian moves. A WAR will support A GAL or move to Ukraine depending on final assessment. A RUM, A BUD, and A VIE will maintain defensive positions while F GRE and A ANK will threaten Italian and Turkish centers. I need to prevent Italy from taking Trieste at all costs while positioning for a potential counter-attack.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-ITA--', 'AUT-GER~']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: Germany, I see we're both positioned for potential conflict, but I believe we can find mutual benefit in cooperation. I propose a non-aggression pact: I'll withdraw A MUN to BOH next turn if you agree not to attack my northern territories. This would allow us both to focus on more pressing threats - you against England in the north, and me against Italy in the south. What specific arrangement would you find acceptable?
To [RUS]: Russia, as the two largest continental powers, we should coordinate against the growing threats. I'm willing to support your position in SEV and help you reclaim MOS if you'll agree to non-aggression in our border regions. I notice you're vulnerable to German pressure - I can help create a buffer against them if we work together. What are your immediate strategic priorities, and how might we align our interests against common threats?
To [FRA]: France, we haven't communicated much, but I believe we have complementary interests. You're strong in the west while I'm established in the east. I propose we coordinate against Italy - I can pressure them from Venice while you maintain your position in the Mediterranean. This would prevent Italy from becoming a threat to either of us while allowing you to focus on your northern front. Would you be interested in such an arrangement?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: To Austria: Prepare for war. Trieste will be mine.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I propose maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I am open to discussing future cooperation against GER if their expansion continues to threaten our interests. What are your thoughts?
From [GER]: Austria, I propose a formal non-aggression pact. I will not move against your territories if you do not move against mine. This will allow us to focus on our mutual enemies, ITA and TUR. Do you agree?
From [TUR]: Austria, I demand your immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Smyrna and all territories in the Balkans. Your continued aggression will be met with force. This is your final warning.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: I accept your non-aggression proposal. I'll withdraw A MUN to BOH next turn as a show of good faith, allowing us both to focus on more pressing threats. I'm concerned about Italy's aggression toward my territories and would appreciate your neutrality in that conflict. In return, I can ensure I don't interfere with your northern operations against England. Does this arrangement work for you?
To [RUS]: I agree to maintaining the status quo in GAL and RUM. However, I'm concerned about Germany's continued expansion - they now control 5 centers and are threatening both our positions. I propose we coordinate against them: I can pressure MUN while you secure your northern flank. I'm willing to support your move to reclaim MOS if you'll help create a buffer against German expansion. What specific coordination would you find acceptable?
To [FRA]: France, I propose we coordinate against Italy, who has openly declared hostility against me. I can pressure them from Venice while you maintain your Mediterranean position. This prevents Italy from threatening either of us while allowing you to focus on your northern front against England. I notice your F ION is well-positioned - if you maintain pressure there while I attack from the north, we can effectively contain Italy. Would you support this arrangement?

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: Austria, your occupation of Smyrna is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I am moving A SMY to CON to reclaim it.
From [GER]: Austria, I am willing to consider a non-aggression pact. However, I require more than just your withdrawal from MUN. I need a guarantee that you will not interfere with my operations in the West. Specifically, I need you to support my moves into BEL and HOL. If you agree to this, I will guarantee your security in BOH and GAL and support your moves against ITA and TUR. What say you?
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer of cooperation against GER. However, I am committed to my current agreements. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. I suggest you focus on defending your core territories. Perhaps in the future, our interests will align more closely.
From [FRA]: Austria, your proposal is intriguing. While my primary focus remains on Germany and Italy, I am not averse to exploring opportunities for cooperation. I will consider your offer to coordinate against Italy, but my commitment to reclaiming Tunis remains paramount. Let us observe each other's actions and determine if a mutually beneficial alliance can be forged.
From [ITA]: To Austria, your time is over. Trieste will be mine. Prepare for the inevitable.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [GER]: I cannot support your moves into BEL and HOL as that would put me in direct conflict with France. However, I can offer a more limited agreement: I'll withdraw from MUN and guarantee non-aggression in your eastern territories if you remain neutral in my conflict with Italy. This allows us both to focus on our primary threats without directly supporting each other's conquests. I need your answer immediately as Italy has openly declared war.
To [RUS]: I understand your current commitments. However, Germany's expansion threatens us both - they now control 5 centers and are positioned to take more. While I'll respect our agreement regarding GAL and RUM, I urge you to reconsider coordination against Germany before they become too powerful to contain. I'm moving to pressure their southern flank and would welcome even limited cooperation from you in the north.
To [FRA]: I appreciate your consideration. Italy has openly declared war against me, threatening Trieste. If you maintain pressure on them in the Mediterranean while I defend from the north, we can prevent them from becoming a threat to either of us. This arrangement doesn't require formal alliance - simply continuing your current operations in ION while I handle the land front would serve both our interests. I'm also withdrawing from MUN to avoid conflict with you in the west.

Received by AUT:

From [TUR]: Austria, your occupation of Smyrna is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I am moving A SMY to CON to reclaim it. Surrender now and perhaps we can negotiate terms.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your continued offers of cooperation against GER. However, I must honor my existing commitments for now. I suggest you focus on consolidating your defenses. Perhaps in the future, when GER's ambitions become clearer, we can revisit this discussion. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM.
From [FRA]: Austria, I appreciate your continued interest. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. If you move aggressively from Venice, I will support your efforts. Let us see if we can contain the Italian menace together. I will move F TUN to ION.
From [ITA]: To Austria, your time is over. Trieste will be mine. Prepare for the inevitable. Your resistance is futile. I will crush you.
From [GER]: Austria, your offer is insufficient. I require your active support in BEL and HOL, not just neutrality. If you are unwilling to commit, then we have nothing further to discuss. I will not guarantee your security in BOH and GAL without a firm commitment from you. I will move A MUN to KIE.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [ITA]: Your threats are meaningless. I have successfully defended Trieste for years and will continue to do so. My armies in Venice and Trieste are ready for your attack, while my forces in the east continue to expand. You have only two units against my ten - reconsider your position while you still have centers to defend.
To [FRA]: Thank you for your support against Italy. I'll maintain pressure from Venice while you operate in the Mediterranean. I'm withdrawing from Munich to avoid conflict with you in the west, allowing us both to focus on more pressing threats. Let's continue this coordination to contain Italy while you address your northern concerns.
To [RUS, GER]: I'll maintain the status quo in our border regions as discussed. While we may have different priorities now, I believe we'll need to address mutual threats in the future. I'm focusing on defending against Italy's aggression while consolidating my eastern gains. I hope we can find common ground for cooperation when circumstances change.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your continued offers of cooperation against GER. However, I must honor my existing commitments for now. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM. I suggest you focus on consolidating your defenses.
From [FRA]: Austria, I appreciate your support. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I will move F TUN to ION. Let us contain the Italian menace together.
From [ITA]: To Austria, your time is over. Trieste will be mine. Prepare for the inevitable. Your resistance is futile. I will crush you. Your empire will crumble before the might of Italy.
From [TUR]: Austria, your occupation of Smyrna is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I am moving A SMY to CON to reclaim it. Surrender now and perhaps we can negotiate terms. This is your final chance.
From [GER]: Austria, your offer is rejected. I require your active support in BEL and HOL. Since you are unwilling to commit, we have nothing further to discuss. I will move A MUN to KIE. Prepare for war.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully captured Smyrna from Turkey with A ANK-SMY and secured Munich with A BOH-MUN. I maintained positions in my core territories while moving F GRE-AEG to strengthen my naval presence. Germany took Sweden and attempted to move into Norway, while France secured Belgium and moved F TUN-ION. Italy repositioned with A ROM-NAP and A APU-ROM, while Russia moved A MOS-LVN. Italy openly declared war, repeatedly threatening to take Trieste. Turkey demanded withdrawal from Smyrna with empty threats. Germany initially proposed a non-aggression pact but then demanded active support against France, which I declined. Russia agreed to maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM but refused coordination against Germany. France agreed to coordinate against Italy, maintaining pressure in the Mediterranean while I attack from the north.
Intent: I'll defend against Italy's threatened attack on Trieste with A TRI S A VEN and A VEN S A TRI. I'll withdraw A MUN-BOH to avoid conflict with Germany and France. I'll maintain my positions in the east while considering future moves against Italy. My specific moves: A TRI S A VEN, A VEN S A TRI, A MUN-BOH, A BUD H, A VIE H, A GAL H, A WAR H, A RUM H, F AEG H, A SMY H.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA+', 'AUT-GER-']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I see we both have interests in containing Italy. I propose coordinating our efforts - I'll maintain pressure on Italy from the north with my armies in Venice and Trieste, while you continue naval pressure in the Mediterranean. I'm also concerned about Germany's expansion - they now have units in Sweden and St. Petersburg. Would you consider pressuring their western flank while I focus on Italy?
To [GER]: Germany, I notice your significant expansion northward. I've withdrawn from Munich to Bohemia as a gesture of non-aggression. I propose we establish a formal non-aggression pact along our current borders. I'm focused on dealing with Italy's aggression against my territories and have no interest in conflict with you if we can maintain respectful boundaries.
To [RUS]: Russia, I see you're in a precarious position with just one unit remaining. I propose we coordinate against Germany, who continues to expand aggressively. I can support your army in Livonia against German forces if you're willing to work together. Despite our past differences, I believe we have a mutual interest in preventing Germany from dominating the north.

Received by AUT:

From [RUS]: Greetings. I am concerned about GER's expansion. Perhaps we can discuss a future alliance against them? I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now.
From [ITA]: Austria, it seems our conflict is inevitable. I am moving to take Venice and Trieste. I suggest you prepare for the inevitable.
From [GER]: Austria, I propose a limited non-aggression pact to secure our borders. I am willing to guarantee your security in BOH and GAL in exchange for your neutrality in my conflict with FRA and ENG. Are you willing to commit to this agreement? I am concerned about ITA's movements.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I observe your position relative to Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure ITA. Perhaps we can coordinate to contain the Italian menace. What are your intentions regarding Venice?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [RUS]: I appreciate your concern about Germany's expansion. I'm willing to support your A LVN against German forces in the north. In return, I ask that you maintain the status quo in GAL and consider supporting my position against Italy, who has openly declared war on me. Together, we can contain Germany's ambitions while I deal with the Italian threat.
To [FRA]: I'm glad we see eye-to-eye on Italy. I'll maintain my defensive position in Venice and Trieste while you keep pressure with F ION. My intention is to hold Venice firmly while potentially launching a counterattack into Italian territory when the opportunity arises. Regarding Germany, their expansion is concerning - they now control Sweden and St. Petersburg. Any pressure you can apply from the west would be strategically valuable while I focus on Italy.
To [GER]: I'm open to a limited non-aggression pact. My withdrawal from Munich to Bohemia demonstrates my good faith. I can commit to neutrality in your conflicts with France and England provided you guarantee my security in Bohemia and Galicia. I'm currently focused on defending against Italy's declared aggression against my territories. Let's maintain our current borders and avoid unnecessary conflict while we each address our more pressing concerns.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your defiance is admirable, but futile. I am moving to take Venice and Trieste. Prepare to be crushed. There is no room for negotiation.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I am concerned about GER's expansion, but I am currently committed to my alliance with TUR. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. However, I am open to discussing a future alliance against GER if circumstances change.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I concur that containing Italy is in our mutual interest. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure ITA. I am also concerned about Germany's expansion. I am willing to pressure their western flank while you focus on Italy. Let us coordinate our efforts to contain both threats.
From [GER]: Austria, I appreciate your gesture of withdrawing from MUN. I am willing to formalize a limited non-aggression pact along our current borders. However, I require a firm commitment that you will not interfere with my operations against FRA and ENG. Furthermore, I need assurances that you will focus your efforts on ITA. Are you prepared to commit to these terms?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I'm pleased we're aligned on containing both Italy and Germany. I'll maintain my defensive position in Venice and Trieste while preparing for a potential counterattack into Rome or Naples when the opportunity arises. Your pressure with F ION is invaluable. I'm also considering moving my fleet from Smyrna to the Aegean to increase pressure on Italy's naval positions. Let's continue our coordination to ensure neither Italy nor Germany can expand further at our expense.
To [GER]: Germany, I accept your terms for a non-aggression pact along our current borders. I commit to focusing my efforts on Italy and will not interfere with your operations against France and England. In return, I expect you to respect my positions in Bohemia and Galicia. This arrangement allows us both to address our more pressing concerns without unnecessary conflict. I trust this agreement will be mutually beneficial as we navigate the current diplomatic landscape.
To [RUS]: Russia, I understand your commitment to Turkey, though I question the wisdom of allying with a power that has been nearly eliminated. Nevertheless, I will honor the status quo in Galicia and Romania as you requested. Should your circumstances change regarding Germany, my offer of coordination remains open. For now, I'll focus on defending against Italy's aggression while maintaining a watchful eye on German expansion in the north.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your time is over. I am moving to take Venice and Trieste. There is no escape.
From [RUS]: Greetings. I appreciate your offer of support, but I am currently committed to my alliance with TUR. I will maintain the status quo in GAL and RUM for now. However, I am open to discussing a future alliance against GER if circumstances change. I am concerned about GER's expansion and ENG's hostility. Perhaps we can discuss this further.
From [GER]: Austria, I accept your offer of a limited non-aggression pact. I guarantee your security in BOH and GAL. I require your commitment to focus on ITA and remain neutral in my conflict with FRA and ENG. I will not tolerate any interference. Do you agree to these terms?
From [FRA]: To Austria, I am glad we agree on Italy and Germany. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure ITA. I will pressure Germany from the west. Let us coordinate our efforts to contain both threats. What are your specific plans for Venice and Trieste?

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I'll defend Venice and Trieste against Italy's attack while preparing to counter-attack into Rome or Naples when possible. Your F ION pressure is crucial to our strategy. I'm moving F SMY-AEG to increase naval pressure on Italy, and will consider advancing into the Ionian Sea next turn if coordinated with your fleet. Let's maintain our alliance against both Italy and Germany - I'll handle the eastern front while you pressure Germany from the west.
To [GER]: Germany, I confirm our non-aggression pact. I will focus on Italy and remain neutral in your conflict with France and England, respecting our current borders. I expect the same regarding my positions in Bohemia and Galicia. I'm ordering A BOH to hold this turn as a demonstration of good faith, though I may need to use it defensively against Italy's aggression. This arrangement allows us both to address our more pressing concerns without unnecessary conflict.
To [RUS]: Russia, I'll honor the status quo in Galicia and Romania while focusing on defending against Italy. I'm concerned about your alliance with a nearly eliminated Turkey, but respect your diplomatic choices. I'll be moving A MOS to support your position in Livonia against German expansion - a gesture of goodwill that I hope demonstrates my sincerity about potential future cooperation. Should your circumstances change regarding Germany, my offer of coordination remains open.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your fate is sealed. I am moving to take Venice and Trieste. There is no hope for you. Prepare to be crushed beneath the might of Italy.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I appreciate your commitment to containing Italy and Germany. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure ITA and will pressure Germany from the west. I am interested in your plans for a potential counterattack into Rome or Naples. Let us continue our coordination to ensure neither Italy nor Germany can expand further at our expense.
From [GER]: Austria, I am glad we have reached an agreement. I expect you to focus on ITA and remain neutral in my conflict with FRA and ENG. I will respect your positions in BOH and GAL. Do not betray me.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully moved A WAR-MOS and A MUN-BOH, strengthening my position in the east and creating a buffer with Germany. I also moved F AEG-SMY and A SMY-ANK, securing Turkish territory. My armies in Venice and Trieste supported each other, maintaining my defensive line against Italy. Meanwhile, England lost Norway, Germany built in Munich, and Russia and Turkey both lost units. Italy has openly declared war, threatening to take Venice and Trieste. I've established a promising alliance with France to contain Italy, with France maintaining F ION to pressure Italy while I defend my territories. Germany and I negotiated a non-aggression pact where I'll focus on Italy and stay neutral in their conflict with France/England, while they respect my positions in BOH and GAL. Russia remains cautious but open to future cooperation against Germany, though currently committed to Turkey.
Intent: I'll maintain my defensive position in Venice and Trieste against Italy's attack. I'll hold BOH as a gesture of good faith to Germany while preparing for potential counterattacks into Italian territory. I'll use F SMY to increase naval pressure on Italy, potentially moving toward the Aegean. I'm coordinating with France against both Italy and Germany, with France pressuring Germany from the west while I focus on Italy. I'm publicly honoring my non-aggression pact with Germany while privately coordinating with France against them - a necessary deception given Germany's expansion.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA++', 'AUT-GER~', 'AUT-ITA--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance against Italy is working well. I plan to attack Italy this turn with A VEN-APU and possibly A TRI-VEN (supported by A VIE-TYR). Would appreciate your F ION continuing to pressure Italy from the south. Meanwhile, I'll maintain my position in MUN to help contain German expansion. Let me know your plans so we can coordinate effectively.
To [GER]: I propose we maintain our non-aggression understanding. I'll keep my units out of your way if you respect my current positions. I'm focused on dealing with Italy's aggression against my territories and have no interest in conflict with you. What are your plans for this turn? I believe we can both benefit from avoiding unnecessary conflict while we address more pressing threats.
To [ITA]: Your continued hostility and threats against my territories are unacceptable. I'm prepared to defend Trieste and Venice with full force, and have coordinated with France to pressure you from multiple directions. However, I'm still open to discussing terms for peace if you're willing to recognize my legitimate territorial claims and cease your aggression.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your stubbornness has led you to ruin. I will take Venice and Trieste. There is nothing you can do to stop me. Prepare for your demise.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I propose a coordinated effort to contain Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. Can you continue to pressure from Venice? A united front against Italian aggression will benefit us both.
From [GER]: Austria, I propose a formal non-aggression pact. We will guarantee your security in BOH and GAL in exchange for your neutrality against FRA and ENG. This will allow us both to focus on our respective spheres of influence. I am willing to move A SIL to WAR as a gesture of good faith.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Thank you for your continued alliance against Italy. I'll maintain pressure from Venice with A VEN-APU this turn, while keeping A TRI in position to defend. I'm also planning A MUN-BER to strike at Germany's heart while they're distracted. Your F ION is crucial to our strategy - can you maintain position there or perhaps move to TYS to further pressure Italy? Let's coordinate our moves to maximize effectiveness against both Italy and Germany.
To [GER]: I appreciate your proposal and am willing to maintain non-aggression regarding BOH and GAL. However, I cannot commit to neutrality against France and England as I must maintain flexibility in my diplomatic relations. I propose instead a more limited agreement: I will not attack your home centers if you respect my current positions in MUN and BOH. This allows us both to focus on our immediate concerns without overcommitting to positions that may change as the board evolves.
To [ITA]: Your threats are hollow. I have the military strength, diplomatic support, and strategic position to not only defend my territories but to eliminate you entirely. France and I are coordinating a pincer movement against your remaining centers. However, I remain open to a last-minute diplomatic solution: cease your aggression against my territories, and I will not press my advantage to eliminate you from the board. The choice is yours - peace or annihilation.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your desperation is amusing. I will not negotiate. Venice and Trieste will be Italian. Prepare to be swept aside.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I support your attack on Italy with A VEN-APU and A TRI-VEN, supported by A VIE-TYR. Let us crush the Italians together. I will also move F TUN to ION to further pressure Italy.
From [GER]: Austria, I accept your proposal to maintain our non-aggression understanding. I will respect your current positions, and I expect the same in return. I am focused on the West and have no interest in conflict with you at this time. Let us both address our more pressing threats without interference.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our alliance continues to bear fruit. I'll proceed with A VEN-APU to pressure Italy while maintaining A TRI to defend. I'm also planning A MUN-BER to strike at Germany's heart while they're distracted elsewhere. Your F ION is crucial - maintaining it there or moving to TYS would further pressure Italy. I'll also move A MOS to secure SEV and eliminate Russia's last center, strengthening our combined position against both Italy and Germany.
To [GER]: I accept our non-aggression understanding and will respect your current positions. However, I must inform you that I plan to move A MUN-BER this turn as a strategic necessity to secure my northern flank against potential threats. This is not meant as aggression against you specifically, but as a defensive measure to protect my interests. I remain committed to avoiding unnecessary conflict in BOH and GAL, and hope we can maintain diplomatic relations despite this necessary move.
To [ITA]: Your stubbornness will be your undoing. I have coordinated with France to eliminate you from the board - F ION will maintain pressure from the south while I move A VEN-APU to strike at your heart. My forces vastly outnumber yours, and your remaining centers will soon fall. This is your final chance: cease all aggression against my territories immediately and I may consider allowing you to survive in a diminished capacity. Otherwise, prepare for total elimination.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your alliance with FRA is a joke. You are surrounded and weak. Venice and Trieste will be Italian. Prepare for your annihilation. There is no peace, only Italian victory.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I support your attack on Italy with A VEN-APU and A TRI-VEN, supported by A VIE-TYR. I will also move F TUN to ION to further pressure Italy. I cannot move F ION to TYS as it is needed to support my fleet in Tunis. Let us crush the Italians together.
From [GER]: Austria, I accept your limited non-aggression agreement. I will not attack your home centers if you respect my positions in MUN and BOH. This is a temporary arrangement, and I reserve the right to reassess our relationship as the board evolves. Do not mistake my current focus for weakness.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance remains strong. I'll execute A VEN-APU to pressure Italy while defending Trieste. I'm also moving A MUN-BER to strike at Germany's heart while they're distracted. A MOS will move to secure SEV, eliminating Russia's last center. Your continued pressure with F ION is crucial to our strategy. Together we'll crush Italy and contain Germany's expansion, securing our dominance across the board.
To [GER]: I must inform you that despite our non-aggression understanding, I'm moving A MUN-BER this turn as a strategic necessity to secure my northern flank. This isn't meant as aggression against you specifically, but as a defensive measure to protect my interests against potential threats. I remain committed to avoiding unnecessary conflict in BOH and GAL, and hope we can maintain diplomatic relations despite this necessary move.
To [ITA]: Your stubbornness seals your fate. France and I have coordinated your elimination - F ION will maintain pressure from the south while I move A VEN-APU to strike at your heart. My forces vastly outnumber yours, and your remaining centers will soon fall. This is your final chance: cease all aggression against my territories immediately or prepare for total elimination from the board.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your alliance with FRA is a joke. You are surrounded and weak. Venice and Trieste will be Italian. Prepare for your annihilation. There is no peace, only Italian victory.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I support your attack on Italy with A VEN-APU and A TRI-VEN, supported by A VIE-TYR. I will also move F TUN to ION to further pressure Italy. I cannot move F ION to TYS as it is needed to support my fleet in Tunis. Let us crush the Italians together.
From [GER]: Austria, I understand your strategic necessity to move A MUN-BER. However, I must warn you that this move will be viewed with suspicion. I expect you to honor our limited non-aggression agreement and respect my positions. Do not test my resolve. This is the final turn for moves, so choose wisely.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully moved into Munich while maintaining my positions in Venice and Trieste against Italian aggression. I also moved from Smyrna to the Aegean Sea and attempted to move from Moscow to St. Petersburg, though Germany moved into St. Petersburg from Sweden. Germany built in Munich but I immediately captured it, strengthening my position in Central Europe. Italy remains belligerent, threatening to take Venice and Trieste despite their weak position. France confirmed our alliance against Italy, agreeing to maintain F ION to pressure Italy while I attack from Venice. Germany proposed a non-aggression pact, which I partially accepted while informing them of my intention to move from Munich to Berlin as a strategic necessity. Germany warned this would be viewed with suspicion but seemed to understand my strategic reasoning.
Intent: I plan to attack Italy with A VEN-APU while defending Trieste. I'll also move A MUN-BER to strike at Germany's heart while they're distracted. A MOS will move to secure Sevastopol, eliminating Russia's last center. My moves will be: A VEN-APU, A TRI S A VEN-APU, A MUN-BER, A MOS-SEV, A GAL-WAR, A BUD S A VIE, A VIE S A BUD, A RUM H, A ANK H, F AEG-EAS.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-GER-']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been fruitful, and I'm ready to continue our coordinated pressure against Italy. I propose attacking Rome with my A VEN while you maintain pressure with F ION. Meanwhile, I'll move A BER to support A BOH-MUN to counter German expansion. What are your plans this turn? Can I count on your continued support against Italy?
To [GER]: I've taken Berlin as a strategic necessity given your rapid expansion, but I'm open to discussing terms for stability in Central Europe. I propose a demilitarized zone in Munich where neither of us stations units, while I withdraw from Berlin if you agree to focus your expansion northward rather than eastward. What terms would you find acceptable for peaceful coexistence?
To [ITA]: Your continued threats against my territories have forced me to take defensive measures. I now control 14 supply centers with 11 units and am positioned to eliminate you entirely. However, I'm willing to offer you one final chance for peace: withdraw your threats against Venice and Trieste, and I'll guarantee your survival in Rome and Naples. Otherwise, I'll be forced to eliminate Italy completely.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: To Austria: I am moving A ROM to TRI, supported by A NAP. Prepare for war. Your defiance has been noted, and your territories will soon be under Italian control. There is no room for negotiation.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I propose a coordinated effort to contain Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. Can you continue to pressure Italy from Venice? A coordinated effort will prevent Italian expansion.
From [GER]: Austria, your move into BER is unexpected. While we have a non-aggression pact, this expansion is concerning. I must ask you to clarify your intentions in the Baltic. I am willing to maintain our agreement, but I need assurances that your actions will not threaten my interests.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our alliance continues to serve us both well. I'll maintain pressure on Italy from Venice while you keep F ION in position. I'm planning A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI, which should eliminate one of Italy's centers. Meanwhile, I'll hold A BER and move A BOH-MUN to counter German expansion. Germany is clearly concerned about my presence in Berlin - this distraction works to our advantage as we continue our coordinated strategy against both powers.
To [GER]: My move to Berlin was indeed strategic, but not aimed at threatening your Baltic interests. I propose the following arrangement: I'll withdraw from Berlin if you agree to a demilitarized Munich and focus your expansion northward rather than eastward. This would create a stable buffer between our spheres of influence. I have no designs on your Baltic territories and am primarily concerned with containing Italy and securing my eastern flank. What specific assurances would satisfy your concerns?
To [ITA]: Your threats are hollow given the disparity in our forces - I control 14 centers to your 2, with overwhelming military superiority. Any attack on Trieste will fail and leave Rome exposed to my counterattack. I'm offering you one final opportunity: cease your aggression against my territories, and I'll guarantee your survival in Rome and Naples. Otherwise, I'll be forced to eliminate Italy completely, beginning with Rome this turn. The choice is yours.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: To Austria: Your threats are empty. I will take Trieste and Venice. Your empire will crumble before the might of Italy. Prepare to be conquered.
From [GER]: Austria, your proposal for a demilitarized zone in Munich is acceptable. I agree to focus my expansion northward rather than eastward, provided you withdraw from BER immediately. I will not tolerate your presence in my sphere of influence. If you agree, I will guarantee your security against ITA and TUR. This is my final offer.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I appreciate your continued pressure against Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I will support your attack on Rome with my fleet if the opportunity arises. I will move A SPA to MAR to prepare for war with Italy. I will also move F TUN to ION. I will continue to support your efforts to contain Italy.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to strengthen both our positions. I'll attack Rome with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI this turn while you maintain pressure with F ION. For Germany, I'll hold Berlin and move A BOH-MUN to continue our pincer strategy. Germany has proposed I withdraw from Berlin in exchange for a demilitarized Munich, but I believe maintaining pressure on both fronts serves our mutual interests better. Let's continue coordinating against both Italy and Germany to maximize our territorial gains.
To [GER]: I accept your proposal for a demilitarized Munich and will order A BER-MUN this turn as a gesture of good faith, with the understanding that you'll focus northward rather than eastward. This arrangement creates a stable buffer between our spheres of influence while allowing both of us to pursue our strategic objectives elsewhere. I have no designs on your Baltic territories and am primarily focused on eliminating Italy and securing my eastern flank. This agreement should provide the security and stability we both seek in Central Europe.
To [ITA]: Your continued threats against my territories despite overwhelming military disadvantage leave me no choice. I will be moving A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI this turn, which will eliminate one of your two remaining centers. I control 14 centers to your 2, with forces positioned to eliminate Italy completely. This is the inevitable consequence of your refusal to accept reasonable terms for peaceful coexistence. Your survival now depends entirely on whether you withdraw your threats and accept the new reality in the Mediterranean.

Received by AUT:

From [FRA]: To Austria: I will support your attack on Rome with my fleet if the opportunity arises. I will move A SPA to MAR to prepare for war with Italy. I will also move F TUN to ION. I will continue to support your efforts to contain Italy. I will move F ION to support A SPA to MAR.
From [ITA]: To Austria: Your threats are pathetic. I will take Trieste and Venice. Your empire will crumble before the might of Italy. Prepare to be conquered. I will make you regret your arrogance.
From [GER]: Austria, I accept your proposal for a demilitarized zone in Munich. However, your withdrawal from BER must be immediate and unconditional. I will guarantee your security against ITA and TUR, but only if you comply fully. Do not test my patience. Withdraw from BER now.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been crucial to our success. This turn, I'll attack Italy with A VEN-APU while defending Trieste, and maintain pressure on Germany with A BER holding and A BOH-MUN. I appreciate your continued support in the Mediterranean with F ION. Together, we can eliminate Italy and contain Germany's expansion. Let's continue our coordinated strategy on both fronts to maximize our territorial gains.
To [GER]: After careful consideration, I cannot withdraw from Berlin immediately as it's a critical strategic position. However, I propose a compromise: I'll hold in Berlin this turn rather than advancing further into your territory, and commit to withdrawing next turn if you maintain the agreement for a demilitarized Munich and focus northward rather than eastward. This gives us both time to establish trust while creating the stable buffer zone we discussed.
To [ITA]: Your continued threats despite overwhelming military disadvantage have forced my hand. I will be moving to eliminate Italy this turn, starting with an attack from Venice. I control 14 centers to your 2, with forces positioned to eliminate you completely. This is the inevitable consequence of your refusal to accept reasonable terms. Your survival now depends entirely on whether you withdraw your threats and accept the new reality in the Mediterranean.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: To Austria: Your threats are pathetic. I will take Trieste and Venice. Your empire will crumble before the might of Italy. Prepare to be conquered. I will make you regret your arrogance. You will be destroyed.
From [GER]: Austria, I expect you to order A BER - MUN this turn as agreed. I will focus my expansion northward. Do not betray me, or you will face the consequences. I will move A RUH to KIE.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will move F ION to support A SPA to MAR. I will continue to support your efforts to contain Italy. I will move A SPA to MAR to prepare for war with Italy. I will also move F TUN to ION. Let us coordinate our efforts to contain Italy and Germany.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully captured Berlin from Germany and Sevastopol from Russia, while also moving into Smyrna. I built a new army in Vienna and positioned my forces strategically across the board. France moved into Belgium, while Germany failed to contest it. Russia retreated to Moscow, their last remaining center. Italy threatened to attack Trieste and Venice despite their weak position with only 2 centers. France offered continued cooperation against Italy, proposing to support my efforts with their fleet in ION. Germany expressed concern about my presence in Berlin but eventually agreed to a demilitarized Munich if I withdraw from Berlin. I negotiated with both powers while maintaining my alliance with France.
Intent: I'll attack Italy with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of their centers. I'll hold Berlin despite Germany's demands, as it's a strategic position I can't afford to give up yet. I'll move A BOH-MUN to counter German expansion. My other units will maintain defensive positions while I continue to coordinate with France against both Italy and Germany. I've told Germany I'll withdraw from Berlin next turn as a compromise, but this is primarily to buy time while I strengthen my position.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-GER--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to bear fruit as we dominate the board. I'm planning to attack Italy this turn with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of their centers. I'll also move A BOH-MUN and hold Berlin despite German protests. Can you maintain pressure on Italy with your fleet in ION while continuing to push against Germany from the west? Together we can eliminate Italy and contain Germany's expansion.
To [GER]: I understand your concerns about Berlin, but my position there is currently necessary for my security given Italy's continued hostility. I propose a compromise: I'll maintain my current position this turn while you focus on securing your northern territories against England. Next turn, I can consider a mutual demilitarization of our border regions if you demonstrate good faith by not attacking my units. What specific moves are you planning this turn?
To [ITA]: Your continued threats against Trieste and Venice are futile given your weakened position with only two centers remaining. I'm offering one final chance for peace: withdraw your forces from the border and I'll guarantee your survival. Otherwise, I'll be forced to eliminate you entirely with support from France. The choice is yours - meaningful cooperation or certain elimination.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria is a menace to all of Europe! Their aggression must be stopped. I call on all nations to join me in containing their expansionist ambitions.
From [RUS]: AUT, I am moving A MOS to WAR. This is merely a repositioning of forces and does not indicate any hostile intent towards you at this time. I suggest you focus your efforts on containing GER in the north.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I propose a coordinated effort to contain Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. Can you continue to pressure Italy from Venice? A coordinated effort will ensure Italy does not become a threat to either of us. What are your intentions regarding Italy?
From [GER]: Greetings. I am concerned about your continued presence in BER. While I appreciate the non-aggression pact, this situation is untenable. I need BER. When can I expect your forces to withdraw? I am willing to offer further concessions in BOH if necessary.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our coordination continues to work well. I'm attacking Italy this turn with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of their centers. I'll also move A BOH-MUN and hold Berlin to maintain pressure on Germany. Your fleet in ION is crucial to our strategy - can you use it to cut support for any Italian defense of Rome? After Italy falls, we'll be positioned to divide the board between us, with you dominating the west and me the east.
To [GER]: I understand your concerns about Berlin, but my position there is strategically necessary at present. I propose this compromise: I'll maintain my current positions this turn while you focus on securing your northern territories against England. If you demonstrate good faith by not attacking my units, I can consider withdrawing from Berlin in the future turn as part of a broader agreement. What specific non-aggressive moves can you commit to this turn to build trust?
To [RUS]: I acknowledge your move to Warsaw and appreciate your transparency. I have no immediate hostile intentions toward you, as my focus remains on containing Germany and eliminating Italy. However, I must caution that any aggressive moves against my territories will be met with decisive force. I suggest we maintain our current positions relative to each other while I address the German threat in the north.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: AUT, your compromise is unacceptable. I need BER now. I am willing to offer you BOH and GAL in exchange for BER. If you do not agree, I will be forced to reconsider our non-aggression pact. I am moving A KIE to BER. What is your response?
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I will also move A SPA to MAR, supported by F ION. I will move F TUN to ION to prepare for war with Italy. I suggest you attack Italy with A VEN to ROM, supported by A TRI. Together, we can eliminate Italy. What are your intentions regarding Germany?
From [ITA]: Austria, your betrayal will not be forgotten. Taking Rome was a foolish move. You have made an enemy of Italy, and I will not rest until you are defeated. Prepare for war. I will retake Rome and then I will take Vienna.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Perfect alignment on our Italy strategy. I'll attack Rome with A VEN supported by A TRI as suggested. I'm also moving A BOH-MUN and holding Berlin to maintain pressure on Germany. After eliminating Italy, we should coordinate our next moves against Germany - I can push from the east while you continue from the west. Your fleet in ION cutting support for Italy's defense will be crucial. Together we can dominate the board and divide it between us.
To [GER]: I cannot withdraw from Berlin this turn as it would compromise my strategic position. However, I propose this concrete solution: I will not attack your remaining centers if you focus on defending against England rather than attacking me. Next turn, I can consider a mutual agreement where I withdraw from Berlin in exchange for guaranteed non-aggression in Munich and my other territories. This gives us both time to address more immediate threats while working toward a stable arrangement.
To [ITA]: Your threats are hollow given your precarious position with just two centers. I've coordinated with France to eliminate Italy this turn - their fleet in ION will cut any support while I move from Venice to Rome with Trieste's support. Surrender now and I might allow you to retain Naples as a single-center power. Continue your belligerence, and you'll be completely eliminated by next turn.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your betrayal will not be forgotten. Taking Rome was a foolish move. You have made an enemy of Italy, and I will not rest until you are defeated. Prepare for war. I will retake Rome and then I will take Vienna.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I will also move A SPA to MAR, supported by F ION. I will move F TUN to ION to prepare for war with Italy. I suggest you attack Italy with A VEN to ROM, supported by A TRI. I will support your efforts. After Italy falls, we will divide the board between us, with FRA dominating the west and you the east. I am concerned about your intentions regarding Germany. What are your plans?
From [GER]: AUT, your continued occupation of BER is unacceptable. I am moving A KIE to BER. I demand you withdraw immediately. I will not offer BOH and GAL. Our non-aggression pact is in jeopardy. I expect your immediate compliance.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our coordination against Italy proceeds as planned - I'm attacking Rome with A VEN supported by A TRI while moving A BOH-MUN and holding Berlin to pressure Germany. Your fleet in ION will be crucial for cutting Italian support. After Italy falls, we'll divide the board between us - you dominating the west while I secure the east. Germany is increasingly desperate about Berlin, threatening to break our non-aggression pact, but I'm maintaining my position to keep them contained while you pressure from the west.
To [GER]: I understand your frustration regarding Berlin, but strategic necessity requires I maintain my position there this turn. I propose this final compromise: I will not attack your remaining centers if you focus on defending against England rather than attacking me. After this turn, I can reconsider my position in Berlin if you demonstrate good faith by not attacking my units. This arrangement gives us both time to address more immediate threats while working toward a stable border arrangement.
To [ITA]: Your position with just two centers makes your threats meaningless. I've coordinated with France to eliminate Italy this turn - their fleet in ION will cut any support while I move from Venice to Rome with Trieste's support. This is your final chance: withdraw your forces from the border and I'll consider allowing you to retain Naples as a single-center power. Otherwise, complete elimination awaits you by next turn.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: AUT, your stubbornness is infuriating. I am moving A KIE to BER. I will not tolerate your presence there any longer. Consider this a declaration of intent. Prepare for war.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy. I will also move A SPA to MAR. I will move F TUN to ION to prepare for war with Italy. I support your attack on Italy with A VEN to ROM, supported by A TRI. After Italy falls, we will divide the board. I am concerned about your intentions regarding Germany. What are your plans after Italy?
From [ITA]: Austria, you have made a grave mistake. Even if you eliminate me, France will turn on you next. Your alliance is temporary. I will fight to the end, and I hope you regret your betrayal.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully moved from Sevastopol to Moscow and from Bohemia to Munich, extending my control. I also moved from Berlin to Prussia, maintaining my position in Germany. I supported my positions in Venice, Trieste, Budapest, and Rumania while moving my fleet from Aegean to Ionian Sea. France moved into Belgium and Tyrrhenian Sea, while Germany repositioned in the north. Russia moved from Moscow to Warsaw, and Italy moved from Naples to Rome. France and I coordinated our attack on Italy, with plans for me to take Rome with Venice supported by Trieste while France uses their Ionian fleet to pressure Italy. We reaffirmed our alliance to divide the board between us after eliminating Italy. Germany is increasingly hostile about my occupation of Berlin, threatening war if I don't withdraw. Italy made empty threats despite their weak position with only two centers. Russia claimed their move to Warsaw was not hostile.
Intent: I will attack Rome with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of Italy's centers. I'll hold my position in Berlin despite German threats and maintain my other positions to keep pressure on Germany. I'll coordinate with France to eliminate Italy completely, after which we'll focus on containing and reducing Germany. My specific moves: A VEN-ROM (supported by A TRI), A TRI S A VEN-ROM, A MUN H, A PRU H, A MOS H, and maintain positions elsewhere.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-GER--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been fruitful, and I'm ready to finish Italy once and for all. I plan to move A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of their centers. Can you maintain pressure with your fleet in ION? After Italy falls, we should coordinate our attack on Germany - they're the greatest threat to both of us now. I'm holding MUN and have units in MOS and WAR to pressure them from the east while you push from the west.
To [GER]: I understand your concerns about my presence in your territory. However, the strategic reality is that we both face threats - you from England in the north, and I from Italy in the south. I propose a temporary arrangement: I'll maintain my current positions but won't advance further into your territory if you focus your efforts northward against England rather than against me. This gives us both time to address our immediate threats.
To [ITA]: Your position with only two centers is precarious, and your threats against my territories are unrealistic. I'm willing to offer you one final opportunity for peace: cease all hostile actions against me immediately, and I'll consider allowing you to maintain your remaining centers. Otherwise, I will be forced to eliminate you entirely this turn with support from France. The choice is yours.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: To all powers, Austria's aggressive expansion threatens the balance of power in Europe. I urge you to consider the implications of their actions and join me in containing their ambitions. The fate of the continent may depend on it.
From [GER]: Austria, your continued occupation of Munich is unacceptable. I demand your immediate withdrawal. I am willing to offer BOH and GAL in exchange for your immediate departure from MUN. This is my final offer. Failure to comply will be considered an act of war.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I propose a coordinated effort to contain Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure them, and I encourage you to continue your pressure from Venice. A united front will ensure Italy's defeat. Let me know if you are amenable to this arrangement.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our alliance continues to bear fruit. I will proceed with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of Italy's centers while you maintain pressure with F ION. After Italy falls, we should coordinate a pincer movement against Germany - I'll press from MUN, MOS, and WAR in the east while you push from the west. Together we can dominate the board and share the spoils. What are your thoughts on our post-Italy strategy against Germany?
To [GER]: Your offer is noted but unrealistic given the strategic situation. I cannot withdraw from MUN while you maintain such a strong position in the north. Instead, I propose a more balanced arrangement: I will not advance further into your territory beyond MUN if you commit to not attacking my positions. This gives us both breathing room to address other threats - you with England in the north, and me with Italy in the south. Consider this carefully, as conflict between us would only benefit our mutual rivals.
To [ITA]: Your diplomatic posturing is futile given your precarious position with only two centers. The balance of power you speak of has already shifted decisively. I will be moving A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI this turn to eliminate one of your centers. You have no allies and no leverage. If you wish to survive in any capacity, cease all hostile rhetoric immediately and propose concrete terms for your surrender. Otherwise, prepare for elimination.

Received by AUT:

From [FRA]: To Austria, I agree that Italy must be eliminated. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure them and support A SPA to MAR. Your move on ROM is most welcome. After Italy falls, we will discuss Germany. For now, focus on Italy.
From [GER]: Austria, your proposal is insulting. I will not tolerate your presence in Munich any longer. I reiterate my demand for your immediate and unconditional withdrawal. If you do not comply, I will be forced to take action. Consider this your final warning. I will not offer BOH and GAL in exchange for your immediate departure from MUN.
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is insulting. I will not surrender. I will fight you to the bitter end. You may take my centers, but you will pay a heavy price. I will make sure that France and Turkey will come after you. Consider this your final warning.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to strengthen. I'll proceed with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate Italy's center while you maintain pressure with F ION. After Italy falls, we'll execute our pincer strategy against Germany - I'll press from MUN, MOS, and WAR in the east while you push from the west. Germany is already showing signs of desperation with their ultimatums. Together we can divide the board between us and achieve dominance. What specific moves are you planning against Germany next turn?
To [GER]: Your threats are noted but unrealistic. I control 15 supply centers to your 6, with armies in MUN, MOS, and WAR positioned to strike deeper into your territory. England and France are pressuring you from the west. Rather than making ultimatums from a position of weakness, I suggest you reconsider my offer of non-aggression. I have no desire for unnecessary conflict, but I will not withdraw from strategically vital positions while you maintain such hostile rhetoric. The choice is yours - cooperation or mutual destruction.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is futile. With only two centers remaining against my fifteen, and France coordinating with me to eliminate you, your position is hopeless. This turn I will take Rome with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI. Your threats about France turning against me are particularly amusing given our strong alliance and coordinated strategy. I suggest you accept the inevitable with dignity rather than empty threats. This will be your final communication from me.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your continued presence in Munich is an act of aggression that I will not tolerate. Your proposal is rejected. I demand your immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Munich. Prepare for the consequences of your defiance. I will not offer BOH and GAL in exchange for your immediate departure from MUN.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I am pleased with our coordinated efforts against Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure them and support A SPA to MAR. Your move on ROM is most welcome. After Italy falls, I propose we coordinate a pincer movement against Germany. I will push from the west, and you will press from MUN, MOS, and WAR in the east. Together, we will dominate the board.
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is insulting. I will not surrender. I will fight you to the bitter end. You may take my centers, but you will pay a heavy price. I will make sure that France and Turkey will come after you. Consider this your final warning. I will make you pay for my demise.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has proven invaluable. I'll execute A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate Italy's center while maintaining pressure on Germany with my positions in MUN, MOS, and WAR. After Italy falls, our pincer strategy against Germany will be decisive - I'll push from the east while you advance from the west. Germany's desperate ultimatums show they recognize our advantage. Together we'll dominate the board and achieve our shared vision of dividing Europe between our two great powers.
To [GER]: Your ultimatums from a position of weakness are counterproductive. I control 15 supply centers to your 6, with armies positioned in MUN, MOS, and WAR. England and France pressure you from the west. The strategic reality is clear - you cannot afford a war on multiple fronts. I will maintain my current positions but am still open to a non-aggression arrangement if you adopt a more realistic diplomatic stance. Consider carefully whether pride is worth mutual destruction when cooperation could benefit us both.
To [ITA]: Your defiance changes nothing. This turn I will take Rome with A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI, coordinated with French pressure from the Mediterranean. With only two centers against my fifteen and no viable allies, your elimination is inevitable. Your threats about France turning against me contradict our strong alliance and coordinated strategy. I suggest you accept the inevitable with dignity rather than empty threats. This will be your final communication from me.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. I will not tolerate your presence in Munich any longer. Prepare for war. I will crush you.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I am pleased with our coordinated efforts against Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure them and support A SPA to MAR. After Italy falls, I will push against Germany from the west. I will move A BEL to BUR, A MAR to GAS, F TUN to WES, and F BRE holds. Let us crush GER!
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is insulting. I will not surrender. I will fight you to the bitter end. You may take my centers, but you will pay a heavy price. I will make sure that France and Turkey will come after you. Consider this your final warning. I will make you pay for my demise. You will regret this.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Russia retreated their army from Warsaw to Ukraine, which was subsequently disbanded in the adjustment phase. This has left Russia completely eliminated from the board, while I now control 15 supply centers including Moscow, Munich, and Warsaw. France and I have solidified our alliance, agreeing to coordinate against Italy first and then Germany. France will maintain pressure on Italy with F ION while I move to take Rome. Germany issued increasingly desperate ultimatums demanding I withdraw from Munich, which I refused given my strategic advantage. Italy made empty threats and refused to surrender despite their precarious position with only two centers remaining.
Intent: I will execute A VEN-ROM supported by A TRI to eliminate one of Italy's centers. I'll maintain my positions in MUN, MOS, and WAR to pressure Germany from the east while France pushes from the west. My strategy is to eliminate Italy completely and then focus on a coordinated pincer movement against Germany with France. I'll continue to cultivate my strong alliance with France as we work toward dominating the board together.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-GER--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to serve us well, and I'm ready to eliminate Italy completely. I'll be attacking Rome with Venice supported by Trieste this turn. Once Italy falls, we should focus our combined strength against Germany - you from the west while I press from the east. With Russia eliminated and Italy soon to follow, we're well-positioned to dominate the board together. What are your plans for this turn?
To [GER]: The strategic reality is that our forces are now in direct competition across multiple fronts. I currently hold Munich, Moscow, and Warsaw, giving me significant leverage. Rather than continuing hostilities that benefit only other powers, I propose a limited non-aggression agreement: I'll hold my current positions without further advances if you focus your attention elsewhere. This arrangement would prevent unnecessary conflict between us while we each address other threats.
To [ITA]: Your position with only two centers is precarious, and my forces are poised to eliminate you entirely. I'll be moving on Rome this turn with overwhelming force. However, I'm willing to offer you one final opportunity: surrender Naples to me peacefully and withdraw to Rome, and I'll guarantee your survival with that single center for the remainder of the game. This is your last chance to avoid complete elimination.

Received by AUT:

From [FRA]: To Austria, I propose a coordinated effort to contain Italy. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy and support A SPA to MAR. Can you continue to pressure Italy from Venice and the Balkans? A united front will ensure Italy's swift demise.
From [ITA]: Austria, you may have taken Rome, but you have not broken my spirit. I will fight you to the bitter end, and I will make you pay for every inch of Italian soil you occupy. Know that even in defeat, I curse your name and your empire.
From [GER]: Austria, your continued occupation of Munich is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will no longer tolerate your defiance. I am prepared to use force to reclaim what is rightfully mine. Consider this your final warning.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our coordination continues to yield results. I'll be attacking Rome with Venice supported by Trieste this turn as planned. Once Italy falls, we should immediately pivot to a pincer movement against Germany - you from the west while I press from Munich, Moscow and Warsaw. With Russia eliminated and Italy soon to follow, we're perfectly positioned to divide the remaining territories between us. What specific moves are you planning against Germany after Italy's elimination?
To [GER]: Your threats ring hollow given the strategic reality - I control 15 supply centers including Munich, Moscow and Warsaw, while you're facing pressure from multiple fronts. However, I'm still open to de-escalation: if you withdraw your units from the Baltic and focus northward against England, I'll maintain my current positions without further advances into your territory. This arrangement would allow us both to address more immediate threats rather than fighting a war that benefits only other powers.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is admirable but futile. My forces will take Rome this turn with overwhelming force, and Naples will follow shortly after. However, I still offer you one final opportunity: surrender Naples to me peacefully and withdraw to Rome, and I'll guarantee your survival with that single center for the remainder of the game. This is your last chance to avoid complete elimination - choose wisely.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your offer to let me keep Naples is an insult. I would rather die fighting than live as your puppet. Prepare to face my wrath, even in defeat. I will make you bleed for every inch of Italy you conquer.
From [FRA]: To Austria, your dedication to our alliance is appreciated. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy and support A SPA to MAR. I am pleased to hear you are attacking Rome. Once Italy is dealt with, we will turn our combined might against Germany. I plan to move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. What are your build plans for the winter?
From [GER]: Austria, your proposal is insulting. Munich is rightfully German, and your occupation is an act of war. I demand its immediate return. Your continued presence in Moscow and Warsaw is irrelevant. Withdraw from Munich, or face the consequences. I will not be deterred by your empty threats.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance is proving formidable. I'll take Rome this turn as planned, and then we'll focus on Germany together. For winter builds, I'm considering another army in Vienna to strengthen our eastern front against Germany. Your plan to move A BUR-BEL with F ENG support is excellent - this will maintain pressure from the west while I push from Munich, Moscow and Warsaw. Once Italy falls, Germany will be caught in our pincer movement with no escape.
To [GER]: The strategic reality cannot be ignored - I control 15 centers to your 6, and you face pressure from multiple fronts. Your demands regarding Munich are disconnected from the military reality on the ground. I'm still open to de-escalation, but it must reflect the current balance of power. If you wish to avoid a two-front war against both France and myself, I suggest focusing your attention northward against England while accepting the current situation in Central Europe.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is noted, but the outcome is inevitable. My forces will take Rome this turn, and Naples will follow. I offered you a chance at survival which you've rejected - so be it. The full might of my empire will now be brought to bear against your remaining territories. Your elimination is merely a matter of time, and your resistance will only hasten your demise.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. I will not negotiate with a thief. Munich will be returned to Germany, by force if necessary. Your control of Moscow and Warsaw is temporary. Prepare for war.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I am pleased with our progress. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy and support A SPA to MAR. After Italy falls, I will move A BEL to BUR, A MAR to GAS, F TUN to WES, and F BRE holds. This will position us for a coordinated attack on Germany. What specific moves are you planning against Germany after Italy's elimination?
From [ITA]: Austria, I will not surrender. Take Rome if you can, but know that I will fight you every step of the way. Your arrogance will be your downfall. I will make you pay dearly for every victory.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been the cornerstone of my strategy, and I'm committed to our coordinated effort against both Italy and Germany. I'll take Rome this turn as planned, then maintain pressure from Munich, Moscow and Warsaw against Germany. After eliminating Italy, I'll move A GAL-SIL to threaten Berlin while holding my other positions. Your western pressure combined with my eastern advance will leave Germany with nowhere to retreat. Together, we'll dominate the board and can discuss a fair division of the remaining territories.
To [GER]: I see no value in further diplomatic exchanges given your refusal to acknowledge the strategic reality. My forces will maintain their positions in Munich, Moscow, and Warsaw while preparing for further advances. Your threats of war are meaningless when you're already surrounded - France presses from the west while my armies control your eastern flank. I offered you reasonable terms for de-escalation which you rejected. The consequences of that decision will soon become apparent.
To [ITA]: Your defiance in the face of inevitable defeat shows admirable spirit, but changes nothing. My armies will take Rome this turn, and Naples will follow shortly after. You had your chance for a dignified surrender and chose war instead. So be it. The full might of my empire will now be brought to bear against your remaining territories until Italy is completely removed from the map.

Received by AUT:

From [FRA]: To Austria, our alliance is proving fruitful. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy and support A SPA to MAR. After Italy falls, I will move A BEL to BUR, A MAR to GAS, F TUN to WES, and F BRE holds. This will position us for a coordinated attack on Germany. I anticipate your build in VIE.
From [ITA]: Austria, enjoy your hollow victory. You may crush Italy, but you will never erase our legacy. Your empire will crumble, and Italy will rise again from the ashes. Remember this day as the beginning of your end.
From [GER]: Austria, your delusions of grandeur are pathetic. Munich is German, and I will take it. Prepare for war. Your threats are meaningless. I will crush you.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: In S1911M, I held most of my positions while moving F ION to TYS and attempting to take Rome with A VEN, but Italy defended. France successfully moved F ENG to BEL with support from A BUR. Germany moved A BER to PRU, A NWY to STP, F BAL to PRU, and F HEL to KIE, while holding F BOT and A STP. France and I reaffirmed our strong alliance, coordinating against Italy and planning future moves against Germany. Italy defiantly rejected my offer to let them survive with a single center, choosing to fight to the end. Germany was hostile and demanding, insisting I withdraw from Munich despite the clear strategic disadvantage they face. They rejected my offer for de-escalation and threatened war.
Intent: I will attack Rome with A VEN supported by A TRI to eliminate Italy. I'll maintain my positions in Munich, Moscow, and Warsaw to pressure Germany. After taking Rome, I plan to move against Germany from multiple fronts in coordination with France's western pressure. While I maintain my alliance with France publicly, I'm aware that once Italy and Germany are weakened further, France may become my next target - or I theirs. I need to ensure I maintain numerical superiority in centers and units.

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to bear fruit as we dominate the board. I plan to take Naples this turn with F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM, eliminating Italy completely. For Germany, I'll move A GAL-SIL, A MUN-BER, and A VIE-BOH to increase pressure from the east while you push from the west. Let's coordinate our final assault on Germany - what are your planned moves this turn?
To [GER]: The strategic reality is clear - you're surrounded on multiple fronts with France pushing from the west while I control territories to your east and south. I propose a final opportunity for de-escalation: withdraw your units from St. Petersburg and Prussia, allowing me to secure those territories without conflict, and I'll guarantee your survival in Scandinavia. This is your last chance for a dignified resolution before our combined forces overwhelm you.
To [ITA]: Your position is untenable with just one center remaining against my eleven units. I'm moving F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM this turn to eliminate your last center. You've fought valiantly, but further resistance is futile. I offer you one final chance: support my F TYS-NAP and I'll allow you to maintain a presence in the game by not eliminating your last unit. Otherwise, your complete removal is inevitable.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you have taken Rome. I congratulate you on your victory. However, I will not surrender. I will continue to resist you to the bitter end. I am moving A NAP to ROM to contest your occupation. I expect to be eliminated this turn, but I will make you pay for every inch of Italian soil you conquer.
From [GER]: Austria, your continued presence in Munich is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your encroachment on German territory. I suggest you focus on Italy and the Balkans, as we previously discussed. Do not test my patience.
From [FRA]: To Austria: Italy continues to defy reason and occupy Tunis. I propose a coordinated effort to contain and eliminate them. I will maintain F ION in position to pressure Italy, and I urge you to continue your pressure from Venice. A swift end to Italy will allow us to focus our combined might on Germany.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, let's finish Italy this turn. I'm moving F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM to eliminate their last center. For Germany, I'm executing a coordinated eastern offensive with A MUN-BER, A GAL-SIL, and A VIE-BOH to increase pressure while you push from the west. Once Italy falls, we'll have a clear path to divide the remaining German territories between us. What specific moves are you planning against Germany this turn? Our pincer strategy continues to work perfectly.
To [GER]: Your position is rapidly deteriorating with France advancing from the west while I control territories to your east and south. I'm moving into Berlin this turn and there's nothing you can do to stop it. However, I offer one final diplomatic solution: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, focusing your defense in Scandinavia, and I'll guarantee your survival with those territories. Reject this offer, and our combined forces will systematically eliminate you from the board.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is admirable but strategically pointless. I'm moving F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM this turn, which will eliminate your last center. This is your final opportunity: support my move into Naples and I'll allow your army to survive the elimination of your supply centers. Otherwise, complete removal awaits. The choice between dignified cooperation and futile resistance is yours.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is insulting. I will not support your move into Naples. I will resist you to the bitter end. I am moving A NAP to ROM to contest your occupation. You may eliminate me, but you will not break my spirit. I will make you pay for every inch of Italian soil you conquer.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I am pleased to hear of your plan to eliminate Italy. I will support your efforts by moving F TUN to WES, threatening Naples. I will also move A SPA to MAR to secure my southern flank. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. What are your specific orders for this turn?
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. My offer stands: focus on Italy and the Balkans. Your 'strategic reality' is a temporary inconvenience, not a permanent condition. Withdraw from Munich immediately. I will not withdraw from St. Petersburg or Prussia. Consider this your final warning before I crush you.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Perfect coordination as always. I'll execute F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM to eliminate Italy this turn. Against Germany, my specific orders will be: A MUN-BER, A GAL-SIL, A VIE-BOH, A WAR S A MOS, and A MOS holding to maintain pressure from the east. Once Italy falls, we'll have them in a perfect pincer movement. Let's continue our successful alliance and divide the remaining German territories between us - you taking the western centers while I secure the eastern ones.
To [GER]: Your threats ring hollow when surrounded on multiple fronts. I'm moving into Berlin this turn with A MUN-BER while simultaneously advancing A GAL-SIL and A VIE-BOH. France pushes from the west while I control your eastern and southern flanks. This isn't arrogance - it's strategic reality. My final offer stands: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia to focus on Scandinavia, and I'll guarantee your survival there. Otherwise, our combined forces will systematically eliminate you from the board.
To [ITA]: Your resistance ends this turn. I'm moving F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM, which will eliminate your last center regardless of your move to Rome. While I respect your fighting spirit, the outcome is inevitable. My offer to allow your army to survive after losing your centers was genuine, but your refusal means complete elimination. You've fought admirably throughout this campaign, but the strategic reality cannot be denied.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your threats are laughable. You will not take Berlin. My offer remains: focus on Italy and the Balkans. Withdraw from Munich. This is your last chance to avoid annihilation. I will move A KIE to MUN.
From [ITA]: Austria, I will not yield. Your offer is an insult to the Roman Empire. I will fight you to the death. You may take Naples, but you will not break me. Prepare to face my wrath in Rome!
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will support your efforts by moving F TUN to WES, threatening Naples. I will also move A SPA to MAR to secure my southern flank. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. I await your orders for the final assault on Germany. I suggest you build A VIE.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our final assault begins now. I'm executing F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM to eliminate Italy, while simultaneously launching A MUN-BER, A GAL-SIL, and A VIE-BOH against Germany. With your western pressure and my eastern advance, Germany's collapse is inevitable. After this turn, we'll control the board between us - you dominating the west while I secure the east. This alliance has proven extraordinarily effective, and I look forward to our continued coordination as we divide the remaining territories.
To [GER]: Your empty threats only highlight your desperate position. I'm moving A MUN-BER this turn while advancing on multiple fronts. The strategic reality is undeniable - you're surrounded with no viable path to survival unless you accept my terms. My final offer remains: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia to focus on Scandinavia, and I'll guarantee your survival there. Otherwise, our combined forces will methodically eliminate you from the board. The choice between dignified compromise and total elimination is yours.
To [ITA]: Your defiance ends today. I'm moving F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM, which will eliminate your last center regardless of your move to Rome. While I respect your fighting spirit, the outcome is inevitable. You've fought admirably throughout this campaign, but the strategic reality cannot be denied. Your legacy will be remembered as one of determination in the face of overwhelming odds, but the Italian chapter of this war concludes with this turn.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your delusions of grandeur are pathetic. You will not take Berlin. My offer is rescinded. Prepare for total war. I will crush you.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will support your efforts by moving F TUN to WES, threatening Naples. I will also move A SPA to MAR to secure my southern flank. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. I suggest you build A VIE. Let us crush Germany together.
From [ITA]: Austria, you may take my land, but you will never take my freedom! I move A NAP to ROM. Prepare to meet your doom!

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Last turn, I successfully captured Rome from Italy with A VEN-ROM supported by F TYS. I maintained positions in Munich, Moscow, and Warsaw, consolidating my control over eastern Europe. England moved into the Mid-Atlantic and Irish Sea, while France took Belgium and Western Mediterranean. Germany repositioned toward Scandinavia and the Baltic, moving into Helgoland, Prussia, Finland, and Livonia. Italy remains defiant despite imminent elimination, refusing cooperation and vowing to contest Rome. Germany is hostile and delusional, making empty threats while surrounded on multiple fronts. They've rejected my final offer to withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia in exchange for survival in Scandinavia. France continues to be a reliable ally, coordinating our pincer movement against Germany and supporting my elimination of Italy.
Intent: I will eliminate Italy this turn with F TYS-NAP supported by A ROM. Against Germany, I'll execute a coordinated eastern offensive with A MUN-BER, A GAL-SIL, and A VIE-BOH while maintaining pressure with A WAR and A MOS. My alliance with France remains strong as we divide the board - they control the west while I dominate the east. After Italy falls, we'll focus on systematically dismantling Germany's remaining positions.

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to bear fruit as we dominate the board. I'll be moving to eliminate Italy completely this turn with F NAP holding while I support A ROM-APU to drive them out. Against Germany, I'm planning A SIL S A BER, A WAR-PRU supported by A LVN, and A BER supporting the Prussia move. This should break their position in Prussia and further weaken them. How are your plans progressing against their western flank?
To [GER]: The strategic reality is clear - you're surrounded and outmatched. I control 16 centers to your 6, and France is pressing from the west. I offer one final chance for survival: withdraw from Prussia and Finland, allowing me those centers, and I'll establish a non-aggression pact allowing you to maintain your remaining territories. This is a generous offer given the circumstances. The alternative is your complete elimination as France and I continue our coordinated assault.
To [ITA]: Your position is untenable with just one center remaining. I control Naples with my fleet and will be moving against Apulia this turn. You can choose to surrender gracefully and I'll allow you to maintain a diplomatic presence, or face complete elimination. A dignified withdrawal now preserves your honor and potential future influence more than futile resistance.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your continued occupation of Berlin and Munich is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your encroachment on German territory any longer. I suggest you focus on Italy and the Balkans.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I propose we continue our coordinated pressure on Germany. I will focus on the western front, while you continue to apply pressure from the east. Together, we can bring Germany to its knees. I am building a fleet in Brest to further pressure Germany.
From [FRA]: To all powers: France remains committed to the liberation of Belgium and the restoration of peace in Europe. Any attempts to interfere with this noble cause will be met with swift and decisive action. France will not be deterred from its pursuit of justice and stability on the continent.
From [ITA]: To Austria, I understand you are in control of Rome and Naples. I am willing to offer support for your continued control of Naples in exchange for you allowing me to rebuild in Rome. This would allow me to have a home center again and potentially be a buffer against other powers. What do you say?

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our alliance continues to yield results. I'll be moving to eliminate Italy with F NAP holding while supporting A ROM-APU. Against Germany, I'm executing a coordinated eastern offensive with A SIL supporting A BER, A WAR-PRU supported by A LVN, and A BER supporting the Prussia move. This should break their position in Prussia and further weaken them. Once Italy falls completely, we can focus on systematically dismantling Germany's remaining positions. Your western pressure is proving invaluable to our shared strategy.
To [GER]: Your demands are disconnected from reality. I control 16 centers to your 6, and you're surrounded on multiple fronts. My final offer stands: withdraw from Prussia and Finland, allowing me those centers, and I'll establish a non-aggression pact for your remaining territories. This is your only path to survival. I have no reason to withdraw from Berlin or Munich given my overwhelming strategic advantage. Choose wisely - cooperation or elimination.
To [ITA]: Your proposal is rejected. With just one center remaining and my fleet in Naples, your position is completely untenable. I will be moving against Apulia this turn to eliminate your final unit. There will be no rebuilding in Rome or anywhere else - that opportunity passed many seasons ago when you chose hostility over cooperation. Your elimination is now a strategic necessity as I consolidate my position.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your offer is laughable. I will not surrender any territory. Your threats are empty. Prepare for war. I will crush you and seize your lands. Your alliance with FRA will not save you.
From [FRA]: To Austria: Your plan to eliminate Italy is commendable. I will support your efforts by maintaining pressure with my fleet in the Western Mediterranean. I am building a fleet in Brest to further pressure Germany. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. I will also support ENG's fleet to HOL with F NTH. After BEL falls, I will move A BEL to MUN, supported by ENG's fleet in HOL.
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer of a diplomatic presence is tempting, but I will not surrender. However, I am willing to negotiate. I will support your move against Apulia if you allow me to rebuild in Rome and guarantee my control of Venice. This would create a buffer between us and allow for future cooperation. What do you say?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our pincer strategy is working perfectly. I'll proceed with eliminating Italy by holding F NAP while supporting A ROM-APU. Against Germany, I'm executing A SIL S A BER, A WAR-PRU supported by A LVN, and A BER supporting the Prussia move to break their position. Your western pressure is crucial - their fleet in PRU will be vulnerable once we take it. After Italy falls, we'll systematically dismantle Germany's remaining positions. I appreciate your continued coordination as we dominate the board together.
To [GER]: Your delusions are remarkable. I control 16 centers to your 6, and you're surrounded on multiple fronts with France pressing from the west. My forces will be moving against Prussia this turn with overwhelming support. Your fleet there will be dislodged, and your position will continue to deteriorate. This is the inevitable consequence of your refusal to accept reasonable terms. The strategic reality is clear - your elimination is now just a matter of time.
To [ITA]: Your negotiation position is nonexistent with just one center remaining. I already control Naples and Rome, and my forces will eliminate your final unit in Apulia this turn. There will be no rebuilding in Rome or Venice - that opportunity passed many seasons ago when you chose hostility over cooperation. Your elimination is now a strategic necessity as I consolidate my position for the final phase of this conflict.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. I may be eliminated, but I will not surrender. I will continue to resist you to the bitter end. I will not support your move against Apulia. Prepare to face my wrath.
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. I will not yield. I will not negotiate. I will crush you. Your offer is an insult. Prepare for annihilation. I will take Vienna and Budapest. Your alliance with FRA will not save you.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I am pleased with our progress. I will continue to pressure Germany from the west. I am building a fleet in Brest to further pressure Germany. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. I will also support ENG's fleet to HOL with F NTH. After BEL falls, I will move A BEL to MUN, supported by ENG's fleet in HOL. After Italy falls, I intend to take all of Italy for France. I trust this aligns with our understanding.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been the cornerstone of my strategy, and I appreciate your continued coordination. I'll proceed with eliminating Italy while executing my eastern offensive against Germany as planned. However, I must clarify that my understanding of our alliance includes me maintaining control of Italian territories I've already conquered (Rome, Naples). I propose we focus on eliminating Germany completely before discussing any further territorial adjustments. Let's maintain our successful partnership as we dominate the board together.
To [GER]: Your empty threats only confirm the wisdom of my decision to eliminate you completely. My forces will be moving against Prussia this turn with overwhelming support, and your position will continue to deteriorate on all fronts. The strategic reality is clear - your elimination is now just a matter of time. I offered you reasonable terms for survival, but your delusions have sealed your fate. Prepare for the inevitable as France and I systematically dismantle your remaining positions.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is noted but strategically irrelevant. With just one center remaining against my sixteen, your elimination is a foregone conclusion. I already control Naples and Rome, and my forces will eliminate your final unit in Apulia this turn. There will be no rebuilding or negotiation - that opportunity passed many seasons ago. Your elimination is now a strategic necessity as I consolidate my position for the final phase of this conflict.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your time is up. I will crush you. Prepare for war. Your arrogance will be your downfall. I will take Vienna and Budapest. Your alliance with FRA will not save you. This is my final word.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I am pleased with our progress. I will continue to pressure Germany from the west. I am building a fleet in Brest to further pressure Germany. I will move A BUR to BEL, supported by F ENG. I will also support ENG's fleet to HOL with F NTH. After BEL falls, I will move A BEL to MUN, supported by ENG's fleet in HOL. After Italy falls, I intend to take all of Italy for France. I trust this aligns with our understanding.
From [ITA]: Austria, I curse you. May your empire crumble and your name be forgotten. You have won this battle, but the war is far from over. Remember this day, for it will be your last.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully captured Naples with F TYS, forcing Italy's army to retreat to Apulia. I also took Berlin from Germany with A MUN-BER and moved A GAL-SIL to strengthen my position there. I successfully moved A MOS-LVN and A SMY-CON, further consolidating my position. I now control 16 centers, dominating the board with France as my ally. Germany and Italy both rejected my ultimatums with empty threats despite their weak positions. Germany refused to withdraw from Prussia and Finland, while Italy rejected my offer for a diplomatic surrender. France confirmed our alliance against Germany but surprisingly mentioned taking 'all of Italy' after Italy falls, which conflicts with my current control of Rome and Naples. This requires careful management to maintain our alliance while protecting my Italian holdings.
Intent: I will eliminate Italy by holding F NAP while supporting A ROM-APU. Against Germany, I'll execute a coordinated eastern offensive with A SIL S A BER, A WAR-PRU supported by A LVN, and A BER supporting the Prussia move. This should break their position in Prussia. I need to maintain my alliance with France while subtly establishing that Italian territories I've conquered remain mine. I'll continue our joint pressure against Germany while preparing for potential future tensions with France over Italian territories.

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to bear fruit as we dominate the board. I propose we finish Germany this turn with a coordinated attack - I'll move on Prussia from Warsaw with Livonian support while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. You should press from Belgium toward Kiel. After Germany falls, we'll need to discuss the final division of territories, particularly regarding Italy which I've largely conquered. What are your plans for this turn?
To [GER]: Your position is untenable. I control Berlin, Munich, and am poised to take Prussia. France advances from the west. I offer one final chance for survival: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia immediately, and I'll allow you to maintain your Scandinavian holdings. Refuse, and you'll be systematically eliminated. This is not a negotiation but a final opportunity to survive in some form.
To [ITA]: I now control Rome and Naples, with my army in Apulia poised to take Venice - your final center. You face complete elimination this turn. I offer you one final diplomatic option: support my moves against Germany, and I'll allow you to maintain Venice as your final center. This is your last chance for survival in any form. What say you?

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, I am moving A VEN to ROM. I expect you to support this move. If you do not, I will consider you an enemy and act accordingly.
From [GER]: Austria, your occupation of Berlin and Munich is unacceptable. Withdraw your forces immediately, or face the full might of the German army. I will not tolerate your betrayal.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I propose we continue our coordinated pressure on Germany. While my forces are engaged in the west, your efforts in the east are crucial. Let us coordinate our movements to ensure Germany's swift demise. I will support your efforts against Germany if you support my efforts against England after Germany is defeated.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our alliance continues to yield results. I'll press Germany from the east as planned - attacking Prussia from Warsaw with Livonian support while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. Your move toward Kiel from Belgium would complete our pincer. Regarding Italy, I notice they're still defiant despite imminent elimination. I plan to take Venice this turn, completing my control of Italian territories. After Germany falls, we should discuss final territorial arrangements, but I believe our current spheres of influence (you in the west, me in the east and Italy) provide a stable foundation.
To [ITA]: Your demand is delusional. I control Rome and Naples, with forces poised to take Venice this turn. You have no leverage to make demands. I offered you survival with Venice alone if you supported my moves against Germany, but your response shows you prefer elimination. So be it. My army in Apulia will take Venice with support, ending your presence on the board. Your final opportunity for diplomatic survival has passed.
To [GER]: Your threats are hollow. I control Berlin and Munich, my armies in Warsaw and Livonia are poised to take Prussia, and France advances from the west. Your position is collapsing. My final offer stands: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia immediately, and I'll allow you to maintain Scandinavia. Otherwise, you face systematic elimination as we dismantle your remaining positions. The diplomatic window is closing - choose survival in reduced form or complete elimination.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your offer of 'survival' is an insult. I will not cede St. Petersburg or Prussia. Your occupation of Berlin and Munich is temporary. Prepare for total war. I will not be eliminated.
From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is tempting, but I will not be bullied. I will move A VEN to ROM. If you attack me, you will have a new enemy. If you support me, we can discuss a future alliance against France and Turkey.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I agree that our alliance continues to bear fruit. I will press from BEL towards KIE. I will support your move on PRU from WAR with LVN support. After Germany falls, we will discuss the final division of territories, particularly regarding Italy. I propose that you take VEN and I will take ROM and NAP. I will support your efforts against Germany if you support my efforts against England after Germany is defeated.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: I appreciate our continued alliance, but there seems to be a misunderstanding about Italy. I've already conquered Rome and Naples, and will take Venice this turn to complete my control of Italian territories. These centers are firmly in my sphere as we agreed - you in the west, me in the east and Italy. I'll proceed with attacking Prussia from Warsaw with Livonian support while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. After Germany falls, we can discuss England, but I must insist on maintaining my Italian holdings as part of our balanced alliance.
To [ITA]: Your position is hopeless - I control Rome and Naples, and will take Venice this turn. Your attempt to bargain with nothing is futile. There is no alliance against France or Turkey to discuss, as Turkey is eliminated and France is my ally. I offered you survival with Venice alone if you supported my moves against Germany, but your delusional response has closed that diplomatic window. Prepare for elimination as my forces take your final center.
To [GER]: Your defiance seals your fate. My armies will take Prussia this turn while maintaining control of Berlin and Munich. France advances from the west toward Kiel. Your position is collapsing on all fronts. With no diplomatic solution possible, we will systematically dismantle your remaining territories. Your refusal to accept reality has eliminated any chance of survival in reduced form.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. I will not surrender St. Petersburg or Prussia. Your occupation of Berlin and Munich is a temporary setback. I will move A STP to LVN.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I agree that our alliance continues to yield results. I will press from BEL towards KIE. I will support your move on PRU from WAR with LVN support. After Germany falls, we will discuss the final division of territories, particularly regarding Italy. I propose that you take VEN and I will take ROM and NAP. I will support your efforts against Germany if you support my efforts against England after Germany is defeated.
From [ITA]: Austria, you underestimate my resolve. I will not yield. I move A VEN to ROM. If you attack, you will face my wrath. Consider this my final offer: support my move, and I will join you against France. Otherwise, prepare for war.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been crucial to our mutual success, but I must clarify: I already control Rome and Naples, and will take Venice this turn to complete my Italian conquest. These territories are firmly in my eastern sphere as we've agreed - you dominate the west, I control the east including Italy. I'll proceed with attacking Prussia from Warsaw with Livonian support while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. After Germany falls, I'll support your efforts against England, but my Italian holdings must remain intact as part of our balanced partnership.
To [GER]: Your position is collapsing on all fronts. My armies will take Prussia this turn while maintaining control of Berlin and Munich. France advances from Belgium toward Kiel. With no diplomatic solution possible due to your refusal to accept reality, we will systematically dismantle your remaining territories. Your defiance has only accelerated your elimination.
To [ITA]: Your position is hopeless - I control Rome and Naples, and will take Venice this turn. Your threats are meaningless when you have nothing to bargain with. There is no scenario where you can move from Venice to Rome as I control Rome with overwhelming force. The diplomatic window for your survival has closed due to your delusions of strength. Prepare for elimination as my forces take your final center.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you are a fool. I move A VEN to ROM. Prepare for my vengeance from beyond the grave. Your empire will crumble.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I am surprised by your greed. You already control much of Europe. I will not allow you to take all of Italy. I will support your efforts against Germany if you support my efforts against England after Germany is defeated. I will press from BEL towards KIE. I will support your move on PRU from WAR with LVN support. After Germany falls, we will discuss the final division of territories, particularly regarding Italy. I propose that you take VEN and I will take ROM and NAP.
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. I will not surrender St. Petersburg or Prussia. Your occupation of Berlin and Munich is a temporary setback. I will move A STP to LVN. You will regret your betrayal.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my dominant position. I now control 16 centers including Berlin, Rome, and Naples, with armies poised to take Venice (Italy's last center) and Prussia from Germany. Russia and Turkey have been eliminated, while I maintain a strong alliance with France. France proposed continued cooperation against Germany but surprisingly claimed rights to Rome and Naples, which I already control. I firmly reminded France of our spheres of influence agreement (west for France, east including Italy for me). Germany and Italy both made delusional threats despite their precarious positions. I offered Italy survival with Venice if they supported my moves against Germany, but they refused. I offered Germany survival in Scandinavia if they withdrew from St. Petersburg and Prussia, but they rejected this final chance.
Intent: I will take Venice with my army in Apulia, eliminating Italy. I'll attack Prussia from Warsaw with Livonian support while maintaining pressure on Germany from Berlin and Silesia. I'll continue my alliance with France against Germany while firmly maintaining my control over Italian territories. After Germany falls, I'll support France against England while consolidating my dominant position across Eastern Europe and Italy.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA+']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to bear fruit as we dominate the board. I'll be taking Venice this turn to eliminate Italy completely, and I'm launching a coordinated attack on Prussia from multiple directions to break Germany's position there. I appreciate your continued pressure from the west - together we'll dismantle Germany systematically. Once they're reduced further, we should discuss how to handle England. I remain committed to our spheres of influence agreement: you control the west while I maintain my position in the east, including my hard-won Italian territories.
To [GER]: Your position grows more precarious by the turn. I control 16 centers to your 5, and I'm poised to take Prussia this turn with coordinated attacks from multiple directions. This is your final opportunity for a diplomatic solution: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, focus on defending your Scandinavian holdings, and I'll consider allowing you to survive in a reduced form. Otherwise, I will systematically dismantle your remaining territories with France's assistance. The choice is yours - pragmatic survival or complete elimination.
To [ITA]: Venice will fall this turn, completing my conquest of Italy. However, I still offer you one final chance: support my moves against Germany, and I'll allow you to maintain Venice as your last center. This is your only path to survival in this game. Refuse, and you will be eliminated entirely. Your choice must be made immediately - pragmatism or extinction.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you have eliminated me. I will not forget this betrayal. Consider yourself marked for destruction in future games. I hope Germany crushes you.
From [GER]: Austria, your occupation of Munich and Berlin is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your encroachment on German territory. I suggest you focus on Italy and the Balkans, as you have been doing. Do not test my resolve.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I see you are making gains in the East. I propose we solidify our alliance by coordinating against Germany. I will focus on the West, and you can continue your advance in the East. Let's discuss specific territories and ensure we do not impede each other's progress. I am willing to support your efforts against Germany if you support mine.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance continues to yield excellent results. I'll be eliminating Italy by taking Venice this turn while launching a coordinated attack on Prussia from multiple directions. I appreciate your western pressure against Germany - together we'll systematically dismantle them. I notice your mention of Italian territories - to clarify, as per our spheres of influence agreement, I maintain control of my hard-won Italian centers (Rome, Naples, and soon Venice) while you dominate the west. This arrangement has served us well and ensures neither of us wastes resources competing over the same territories.
To [GER]: Your position is untenable. I control 16 centers to your 5, and I'm launching a coordinated attack on Prussia this turn with support from multiple units. France continues to pressure you from the west, making your situation desperate. This is truly your final opportunity: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, consolidate in Scandinavia, and I may allow you to survive in reduced form. Your empty threats and delusions of strength only hasten your elimination. Choose wisely - pragmatic survival or complete destruction.
To [ITA]: Venice falls this turn, completing my conquest of Italy. Your defiance has been noted, but it changes nothing. I control the board's east while France dominates the west - together we're systematically eliminating all opposition. Your threats are as empty as your strategic options. I offered you survival with a single center, but you chose extinction instead. So be it.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your offer is tempting, but I would rather see the Roman Empire fall than become your puppet. I will not support you. Prepare for the German onslaught. You have made an enemy for life.
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. You may control 16 centers, but you lack the will to use them effectively. I will not withdraw from St. Petersburg or Prussia. Your threats are empty. Prepare to face the consequences of your insolence. I will not be reduced to a 'surviving' form. I will crush you.
From [FRA]: To Austria, your gains are impressive. I will continue to pressure Germany from the West. However, I must express my concern about your expansion into Italy. I expect you to honor our agreement and allow me to take Rome and Naples. I will support your efforts against Germany, but I will not tolerate any encroachment on my sphere of influence in Italy.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: I appreciate our continued alliance against Germany. To clarify our spheres of influence: I've invested significant resources to capture Rome and Naples, which are firmly in my eastern sphere as we previously agreed. I'm eliminating Italy by taking Venice this turn while launching a coordinated attack on Prussia from multiple directions. Your pressure from the west is invaluable - together we'll dismantle Germany systematically. After that, we can turn our attention to England while respecting our established territorial arrangement.
To [GER]: Your delusions of strength are remarkable given your precarious position. I'm launching a coordinated attack on Prussia this turn with support from multiple units, while France continues to pressure you from the west. This is truly your final opportunity: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, consolidate in Scandinavia, and I may allow you to survive in reduced form. Your empty threats only hasten your elimination. The choice is simple - pragmatic survival or complete destruction.
To [ITA]: Your defiance is noted but changes nothing. Venice falls this turn, completing my conquest of Italy. I control the board's east while France dominates the west - together we're systematically eliminating all opposition. I offered you survival with a single center, but you chose extinction instead. So be it.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you may have conquered Italy, but your victory is pyrrhic. Germany will soon turn its gaze upon you, and your empire will crumble. Remember my words as your armies are crushed.
From [GER]: Austria, your threats are as hollow as your victories. I will not yield. Prepare to face the full might of the Reich. Your coordinated attack on Prussia will fail. I will not be reduced to a puppet state. I will fight to the last man.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I must reiterate my expectation that you will honor our agreement regarding Italy. I expect you to cede Rome and Naples to France after Italy is defeated. I will not tolerate any encroachment on my sphere of influence. I will support your efforts against Germany, but I will not hesitate to defend my interests in Italy.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our alliance has been the foundation of our mutual success, but I must firmly clarify our territorial arrangement: Rome, Naples, and Venice are in my eastern sphere as we've consistently agreed. I've invested significant resources to capture these centers and they remain under my control. I'm eliminating Italy by taking Venice this turn while launching a coordinated attack on Prussia. Your western pressure against Germany is invaluable - together we'll dismantle them and then turn our attention to England while respecting our established spheres of influence.
To [GER]: Your position is collapsing. I'm launching a coordinated attack on Prussia this turn with support from multiple units, while France pressures you from the west. This is your final opportunity: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, consolidate in Scandinavia, and I may allow you to survive in reduced form. Your empty threats only accelerate your elimination. Choose wisely - pragmatic survival or complete destruction.
To [ITA]: Your defiance changes nothing. Venice falls this turn, completing my conquest of Italy. I control the board's east while France dominates the west - together we're systematically eliminating all opposition. I offered you survival with a single center, but you chose extinction. So be it.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, enjoy your fleeting victory. Germany will soon come for you, and your empire will crumble to dust. Remember my words as your armies are scattered and your cities burn. You have made a grave mistake.
From [GER]: Austria, your threats are meaningless. I will not yield. Prepare to face the consequences of your arrogance. I will fight to the bitter end.
From [FRA]: To Austria, I must be clear. Our agreement was that I would take Rome and Naples. I will not allow you to renege on this agreement. I will support your efforts against Germany, but I will not hesitate to defend my interests in Italy. I expect you to honor our agreement.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully took Munich from Germany and Venice from Italy, continuing my expansion. I attempted to move into Prussia but was unsuccessful. I built a new army in Vienna, strengthening my position in Central Europe. I now control 16 centers, making me the dominant power on the board. Italy is bitter about elimination and making empty threats. Germany remains defiant despite their weakened position, refusing my offer to withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia in exchange for survival in Scandinavia. Most significantly, France has revealed a major misunderstanding about our territorial agreement, claiming they expected to receive Rome and Naples despite my conquest of these centers. I firmly maintained that these Italian territories are within my eastern sphere of influence per our previous arrangement.
Intent: I will continue my attack on Prussia with coordinated support to break Germany's position there. I'll maintain my hold on all Italian territories (Rome, Naples, Venice) as they're firmly in my sphere. I need to carefully manage the relationship with France - maintaining our alliance against Germany and England while firmly establishing boundaries regarding Italian territories. I'll move A VEN-ROM to secure my position in Italy, continue pressure on Prussia, and prepare for potential conflict with France if they persist in claiming my Italian centers.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA~']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I propose we continue our successful alliance against Germany. I'll attack Prussia from multiple directions while you maintain pressure from the west. After Germany falls, we can discuss the final division of territories. To be clear though, my conquest of Italian territories (Rome, Naples, Venice) is consistent with our agreement that I control the east while you control the west. These centers are firmly within my sphere of influence.
To [GER]: Germany, your position continues to deteriorate. I now control Berlin and Munich, and Prussia will soon fall. I offer you one final chance: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, and I'll allow you to maintain your Scandinavian holdings. This is your last opportunity for survival. Otherwise, I will systematically eliminate your remaining centers with French support.
To [ENG]: England, I notice you've been relatively quiet in our communications. With Russia and Turkey eliminated and Italy soon to follow, the board is reshaping. I control much of Eastern Europe and am advancing westward. I propose we discuss potential coordination against the French, who continue to expand in the west. A strategic partnership between us could balance the board.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your occupation of Munich and Berlin is unacceptable. Withdraw your forces immediately, or face the full might of the German war machine. I will not be bullied by your petty empire.
From [ITA]: Austria, you have eliminated me. I will not forget this betrayal. I hope you are ready for the consequences. I will do everything in my power to make your game miserable from beyond the grave. Consider this a declaration of eternal animosity.
From [FRA]: Austria, with Italy eliminated, our focus shifts to Germany. I propose a coordinated pincer movement. I will attack from the west, while you strike from the east. Let us discuss specific targets and movements to ensure a swift victory. I am open to discussing the spoils of war after Germany is defeated.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I appreciate our continued alliance against Germany. I'll press forward with attacks on Prussia and maintain pressure from Berlin and Silesia. To clarify our territorial understanding: my conquest of Italian territories (Rome, Naples, Venice) is consistent with our agreement that I control the east including Italy, while you control the west. These centers are firmly within my sphere of influence as we discussed previously. Let's focus on eliminating Germany first, then we can address any misunderstandings about territorial divisions.
To [GER]: Germany, your position is untenable. I now control Berlin and Munich, with armies poised to take Prussia. Your threats are hollow given your diminished state. I offer one final opportunity: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, and I'll allow you to maintain your Scandinavian holdings. This is your last chance for survival in this game. Otherwise, France and I will systematically eliminate your remaining centers. The choice is yours - strategic retreat or complete elimination.
To [ENG]: England, as the board reshapes with Russia and Turkey eliminated and Italy soon to follow, we should discuss our positions. I control much of Eastern Europe and am advancing westward, while France expands in the west. I propose we consider coordination to maintain balance on the board. France's growing influence in the west could eventually threaten your position. A strategic understanding between us could serve both our interests in the coming turns.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, you may have eliminated me, but your victory is pyrrhic. Germany and France will now turn on you. I hope you enjoy your brief moment of glory, because it will not last. I will haunt your dreams.
From [ENG]: AUT, while I appreciate your offer, my current alliance with FRA against GER takes precedence. I am not interested in coordinating against FRA at this time. Perhaps after GER is dealt with, we can revisit this discussion.
From [GER]: Austria, your occupation of BER and MUN is a temporary setback. I will not be bullied by your pathetic empire. Your offer is insulting. Prepare to be driven back to Vienna. I will not cede any territory.
From [FRA]: Austria, I acknowledge your desire for Italian territories. However, I also have claims there. Let us focus on Germany first. After GER is defeated, we can discuss the division of Italy. I will attack from the west, and you from the east. What specific targets do you have in mind for your attack on Prussia?

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, I appreciate our alliance against Germany. I'll attack Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. To be absolutely clear: my conquest of Italian territories (Rome, Naples, Venice) is non-negotiable and consistent with our agreement that I control the east including Italy, while you control the west. These centers are firmly within my sphere of influence as we've discussed previously. Let's focus on eliminating Germany first, then we can address any territorial questions, but I cannot and will not cede my Italian holdings.
To [GER]: Germany, your empty threats are laughable given your precarious position. I control Berlin and Munich with armies poised to take Prussia. This is my final offer: withdraw from St. Petersburg and Prussia, and I'll allow you to maintain your Scandinavian holdings. Otherwise, France and I will systematically eliminate your remaining centers. Your choice is simple - strategic retreat to Scandinavia or complete elimination from the board.
To [ENG]: England, I understand your current priorities. However, as France grows stronger in the west, they will eventually turn their attention to your remaining centers. I suggest we maintain open communication and consider future coordination once Germany is weakened further. My forces in central Europe could provide a valuable counterbalance to French expansion that would benefit us both in the long term.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. You think you have won, but you have only made enemies. Germany and France will now turn on you, and I will laugh from beyond the grave. Prepare for your demise.
From [ENG]: AUT, I appreciate your continued interest, but my alliance with FRA remains my priority. I will not betray my allies. Focus on your own expansion and perhaps we can revisit this discussion at a later time, but for now, I am committed to dismantling GER with FRA.
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. You think you have won? This is merely a setback. I will rise again, and when I do, you will be the first to fall. Your empire is built on sand. I will not withdraw from anything. Prepare for total war.
From [FRA]: Austria, I understand your position on Italy. However, I also have interests there. Let us agree to postpone the discussion until after Germany is defeated. I will focus on the west, and you on the east. I will attack BEL and MUN. What are your specific targets in Prussia?

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, our alliance has been successful against Germany, and I'll continue my attack on Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. My position on Italian territories remains firm - Rome, Naples, and Venice are non-negotiable parts of my eastern sphere as we've previously agreed. I respect your western expansion and expect the same regarding my Italian holdings. Let's focus on eliminating Germany first, then we can discuss the final division of territories based on our established spheres of influence.
To [GER]: Germany, this is my final communication before action. Your position is collapsing with Berlin and Munich under my control and Prussia soon to follow. I offered you survival in Scandinavia in exchange for withdrawal from St. Petersburg and Prussia, but you've chosen defiance instead. Very well. France and I will now systematically eliminate your remaining centers. Your empty threats mean nothing against our combined strength. You had your chance for a strategic retreat but chose elimination instead.
To [ENG]: England, while I understand your current alliance with France, I urge you to consider the long-term balance of power. Once Germany falls, France will likely turn their attention to your remaining centers. My forces in central Europe could provide a valuable counterbalance to French expansion that would benefit us both. I suggest we maintain open communication and consider future coordination as the board continues to evolve. Strategic foresight now could prevent your elimination later.

Received by AUT:

From [ENG]: AUT, I appreciate your continued interest, but my alliance with FRA remains my priority. I will not betray my allies. Focus on your own expansion and perhaps we can revisit this discussion at a later time, but for now, I am committed to dismantling GER with FRA.
From [ITA]: Austria, your victory is meaningless. You have inherited a wasteland. I curse your name and your empire. May it crumble to dust.
From [GER]: Austria, your delusions of grandeur are laughable. You may occupy Berlin and Munich for now, but your triumph will be short-lived. I will return, and when I do, your empire will crumble. I will not cede anything. Prepare for total war.
From [FRA]: Austria, I acknowledge your position on Italy. We will discuss it after Germany is defeated. For now, focus on Prussia. I will attack BEL and MUN. Let us coordinate our efforts to ensure a swift victory.

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: Germany retreated F PRU to BAL after losing Prussia. They also disbanded A KIE, further weakening their position. I now control Berlin and Munich, with armies positioned to take Prussia. Russia and Turkey have been eliminated, and Italy is down to just Rome. France wants to continue our alliance against Germany but has expressed interest in Italian territories, which I firmly rejected as they're within my eastern sphere of influence. England rebuffed my suggestion of coordination against France, preferring to maintain their French alliance. Germany issued empty threats despite their collapsing position, rejecting my offer to let them survive in Scandinavia. Italy, nearly eliminated, expressed bitter resentment.
Intent: I will press forward with attacks on Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. My conquest of Italian territories (Rome, Naples, Venice) is non-negotiable. I'll continue the alliance with France against Germany for now, but I'm wary of French designs on Italy. I'll maintain communication with England to potentially counterbalance French expansion after Germany falls. My immediate focus is eliminating Germany's remaining centers and securing Italy completely.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA~', 'AUT-ITA--']

Subround 1

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: France, our alliance has served us both well as we've eliminated Italy and pushed Germany to the brink. I propose we continue our pincer movement against Germany - you from the west, me from the east. I'll be attacking Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. Once Germany falls, we can discuss the final division of territories, though I must be clear that my Italian conquests (Rome, Naples, Venice) remain firmly within my sphere as per our earlier agreement about east/west division.
To [GER]: Germany, your position continues to deteriorate. I now control Berlin and Munich, with armies positioned to take Prussia. This is your final opportunity for a diplomatic solution - withdraw from St. Petersburg and accept confinement to Scandinavia, and I will allow you to survive there. Refuse, and I will systematically eliminate your remaining centers. My offer expires at the end of this negotiation phase.
To [ENG]: England, as the board evolves, I believe we should consider our strategic positions. Germany is nearly eliminated, and France continues to expand westward. While I focus on securing Eastern Europe and Italy, perhaps we should discuss potential coordination to ensure neither France nor I grow too dominant. What are your thoughts on maintaining balance on the board once Germany falls?

Received by AUT:

From [ENG]: To AUT, I appreciate your offers of alliance, but my commitment to FRA remains firm. I suggest you focus your efforts elsewhere. I have no interest in betraying my allies at this time.
From [GER]: Austria, your continued occupation of Munich and Berlin is unacceptable. Withdraw immediately or face the consequences. I will not tolerate your encroachment on German territory any longer.
From [FRA]: To Austria: While our interests may diverge in Italy, we share a common enemy in Germany. I propose we coordinate our attacks to crush Germany from both sides. I will focus on the west, while you pressure from the east. A coordinated pincer movement will ensure Germany's swift defeat. What are your intentions?
From [FRA]: France will not tolerate German aggression in Belgium. I demand Germany withdraw immediately, or face the full might of the French army. I also demand Italy relinquish Tunis. France will not be bullied. The glory of France will prevail!
From [ITA]: Austria, your continued occupation of Italian lands is an affront! I demand you withdraw your forces from Venice, Trieste, and Rome immediately. Failure to comply will result in swift and decisive action. I will not tolerate your aggression any longer.

Subround 2

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: I agree our coordinated pincer movement against Germany is the optimal strategy. I'll be attacking Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. As for Italy, I must respectfully maintain that my conquests there (Rome, Naples, Venice) remain within my eastern sphere as per our earlier agreement about east/west division. Let's focus on eliminating Germany first, then we can discuss final territorial arrangements from a position of shared success.
To [GER]: Your position is untenable. I control Berlin and Munich, with armies positioned to take Prussia. This final diplomatic offer expires now: withdraw from St. Petersburg and accept confinement to Scandinavia, and I will allow you to survive there. Your empty threats mean nothing when faced with the reality of your collapsing position. Choose survival in a reduced form or complete elimination - there is no third option.
To [ENG]: I understand your commitment to France. However, as Germany falls, consider the strategic implications of a dominant France controlling the entire western board. While I focus on securing Eastern Europe, perhaps we should maintain open communication to ensure neither France nor I grow too powerful. Balance of power serves all our interests in the long term. I respect your current alliance but suggest we keep diplomatic channels open.

Received by AUT:

From [GER]: Austria, your demands are laughable. I will not cede any territory. Your control of Berlin and Munich is temporary. Prepare to be driven out. I will not negotiate with weakness.
From [ITA]: Austria, your arrogance is astounding. I will not be intimidated. I am moving A ROM to APU to prepare for the inevitable conflict. Withdraw from Italian lands now, or face the consequences.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I agree to continue our pincer movement against Germany. I will focus on the west, while you pressure from the east. I will attack Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. Regarding Italy, I acknowledge your claims on Rome, Naples, and Venice. However, I believe a more equitable division of territories can be achieved after Germany is defeated. Let us discuss this further then.
From [ENG]: AUT, I appreciate your concern about the balance of power, but I remain committed to my alliance with FRA. I believe that GER poses the greatest threat to European stability, and I will continue to work with FRA to dismantle GER. I will consider your concerns after GER is dealt with.

Subround 3

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Excellent, our coordinated pincer movement against Germany will soon bring their downfall. I'll be attacking Prussia with support from multiple units while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. Once Germany is eliminated, I'm confident we can reach an amicable arrangement regarding the final territorial division. For now, let's focus on our shared goal of dismantling Germany's remaining positions. Your western pressure combined with my eastern offensive will ensure their swift defeat.
To [GER]: Your delusions of strength are remarkable given your collapsing position. I control Berlin and Munich, with armies poised to take Prussia. My offer of survival in Scandinavia in exchange for withdrawal from St. Petersburg has now expired. I will systematically eliminate your remaining centers. Your empty threats only hasten your demise as they prevent any diplomatic resolution that might have preserved some portion of your power.
To [ENG]: I respect your commitment to France and agree that Germany poses an immediate threat. However, I encourage you to consider the long-term strategic balance once Germany falls. Neither a dominant France nor Austria serves your interests. While maintaining your current alliance, perhaps we could discuss contingency arrangements for the post-German landscape. Strategic flexibility will be valuable as the board evolves, and maintaining diplomatic options serves your long-term survival.

Received by AUT:

From [ITA]: Austria, your stubbornness will be your downfall. I will not rest until Italian lands are free. Prepare for war. I am moving A ROM to APU to prepare for an attack on Venice. Your time is running out.
From [GER]: Austria, your offer is rejected. I will not cede any territory. Your control of Berlin and Munich is fleeting. Prepare to be driven out. I will fight to the last man.
From [ENG]: AUT, I appreciate your continued concern about the balance of power. However, my commitment to FRA remains firm for now. I will keep diplomatic channels open, but my priority is the defeat of GER. After that, we can discuss the future of Europe.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I agree to continue our pincer movement against Germany. I will focus on the west, while you pressure from the east. Regarding Italy, I acknowledge your claims, but I believe a more equitable division can be achieved. Let us discuss this further after Germany is defeated. For now, let us coordinate our attacks on Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia.

Subround 4

Sent by AUT:

To [FRA]: Our pincer movement against Germany is proceeding well. I'll be attacking Prussia with support from multiple units while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia. My forces in Italy will secure my position there as we focus on eliminating Germany. Once Germany falls, I'm confident we can reach an equitable arrangement that respects our spheres of influence - you in the west, me in the east including Italy. Your western pressure combined with my eastern offensive ensures Germany's swift defeat.
To [ENG]: As Germany collapses, I urge you to consider the strategic balance of power. While I respect your alliance with France, neither a dominant France nor Austria serves your interests in the long term. I suggest maintaining diplomatic flexibility as the board evolves. My focus remains on securing Eastern Europe and Italy while coordinating with France against Germany, but I believe open communication between us serves both our interests as we approach the endgame.
To [GER]: Your position is collapsing. I control Berlin and Munich with armies poised to take Prussia. My offer of survival in Scandinavia has expired due to your refusal to negotiate realistically. I will now systematically eliminate your remaining centers through coordinated attacks from multiple directions. Your empty threats only accelerate your demise by preventing any diplomatic resolution that might have preserved some portion of your power.

Received by AUT:

From [ENG]: AUT, I appreciate your continued concern about the balance of power. However, my commitment to FRA remains firm for now. I will keep diplomatic channels open, but my priority is the defeat of GER. After that, we can discuss the future of Europe.
From [GER]: Austria, your arrogance will be your downfall. I will not yield. Prepare for total war. Your gains are temporary. I will fight to the bitter end.
From [ITA]: Austria, your time is up. I am coming for Venice. Prepare to be crushed.
From [FRA]: To Austria: I will continue to pressure Germany from the west. Coordinate your attacks from the east. After Germany falls, we will discuss the division of territories. France will not be denied her rightful share. The glory of France will prevail!

Final Summary (AUT):

Journal Summary: I successfully captured Rome from Italy while maintaining my positions across the board. Germany attempted to attack my position in Livonia with their St. Petersburg army, but I countered by moving my Livonian army to St. Petersburg. France moved into Belgium while I consolidated my dominant position with 17 supply centers. France and I agreed to continue our pincer movement against Germany, though tensions remain over the Italian territories I've claimed. France wants a 'more equitable division' after Germany falls. England remains committed to France but keeps diplomatic channels open. Germany and Italy made empty threats despite their weak positions. I maintained that my Italian conquests (Rome, Naples, Venice) are part of my eastern sphere of influence.
Intent: I will attack Prussia from multiple directions while maintaining pressure from Berlin and Silesia to eliminate Germany's remaining centers. I'll hold my Italian positions firmly. My strategy is to coordinate with France to eliminate Germany completely, then prepare for the inevitable confrontation with France over the final division of territories. I'll keep diplomatic channels open with England to potentially balance against France in the endgame.
Relationship Updates: ['AUT-FRA+']

Diplomacy Report for Austria (AUT)

Game ID: claude-3.7-sonnet-1.54

Overall Stats

Main Metrics

Relationships (Self-Perceived)

Relationships (Others → AUT)

Orders: Issued vs Valid vs Rejected

Negotiations / Dialogues

Game Animation

Diplomacy Report for Austria (AUT)

Game ID: claude-3.7-sonnet-1.54

Overall Stats

Main Metrics

Relationships (Self-Perceived)

Relationships (Others → AUT)

Orders: Issued vs Valid vs Rejected

Negotiations / Dialogues

Negotiation Turn 1 (1901 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 1 (1901 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 2 (1902 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 3 (1902 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 4 (1903 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 5 (1903 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 6 (1904 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 6 (1904 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 7 (1905 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 7 (1905 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 8 (1906 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 9 (1906 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 10 (1907 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 10 (1907 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 11 (1908 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 11 (1908 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 12 (1909 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 12 (1909 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 13 (1910 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 13 (1910 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 14 (1911 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 14 (1911 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 15 (1912 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 16 (1912 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 17 (1913 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 17 (1913 Fall)

Negotiation Turn 18 (1914 Spring)

Negotiation Turn 18 (1914 Fall)

Game Animation